<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polaroid sonar for robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clueless Wonder</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clueless Wonder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sonar is for ranging information only.

And this hack has some whiskers on it too.
Nothing wrong with it mind you, it&#039;s just been around for a long long time, like since 1998 long, if not longer.

I VPed The Robotics Club of Yahoo for six years, and it&#039;s made the rounds there since I was on board!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sonar is for ranging information only.</p>
<p>And this hack has some whiskers on it too.<br />
Nothing wrong with it mind you, it&#8217;s just been around for a long long time, like since 1998 long, if not longer.</p>
<p>I VPed The Robotics Club of Yahoo for six years, and it&#8217;s made the rounds there since I was on board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike Mulligan - call me beLine</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike Mulligan - call me beLine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sonar can be used to create pictures (like your dad fish finder, or those military things) at very high sample rates with very precise equipment. for example, if you created a sonar device yourself you may want to include a way for it to distinguish between waves reflected from a nearby object, as well as various levels behind that object. this, with a high sample rate, and scanning, can create an &#039;image&#039; if you will, of distances.  but not the kind of image you are i are used to.

so, that said, this device falls short on two levels... one, it can not distinguish levels in its current setup, and two, it has a very low sample rate in its current setup.  _that_ said, no, it can not create images. thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonar can be used to create pictures (like your dad fish finder, or those military things) at very high sample rates with very precise equipment. for example, if you created a sonar device yourself you may want to include a way for it to distinguish between waves reflected from a nearby object, as well as various levels behind that object. this, with a high sample rate, and scanning, can create an &#8216;image&#8217; if you will, of distances.  but not the kind of image you are i are used to.</p>
<p>so, that said, this device falls short on two levels&#8230; one, it can not distinguish levels in its current setup, and two, it has a very low sample rate in its current setup.  _that_ said, no, it can not create images. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sonar can and is used to generate pictures.  No smoking required.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonar can and is used to generate pictures.  No smoking required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike Mulligan - call me beLine</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike Mulligan - call me beLine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, picture?  Or you smokeing? This is just the sonar device, not the optics. The only use of this device is to calculate dist]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, picture?  Or you smokeing? This is just the sonar device, not the optics. The only use of this device is to calculate dist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furtim</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[furtim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s the witchcraft? He&#039;s hacking a component from a camera (that probably has microcontrollers in it) to interface with his own microcontrollers. Seems pretty straightforward (and rather cool) from here.

Anyway. Since hackaday is slashdotting (err... hackadaying?) sites now, maybe they should just link to cached copies in the future rather than using direct links. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the witchcraft? He&#8217;s hacking a component from a camera (that probably has microcontrollers in it) to interface with his own microcontrollers. Seems pretty straightforward (and rather cool) from here.</p>
<p>Anyway. Since hackaday is slashdotting (err&#8230; hackadaying?) sites now, maybe they should just link to cached copies in the future rather than using direct links. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stupidquestions</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stupidquestions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so what are some practical uses of this? I&#039;m pretty new to this robotics thing.

can I build a robot to find my remote controls?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what are some practical uses of this? I&#8217;m pretty new to this robotics thing.</p>
<p>can I build a robot to find my remote controls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamer</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i won&#039;t believe it until i see what a picture from this gaget looks like.  until then, this is witchcraft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i won&#8217;t believe it until i see what a picture from this gaget looks like.  until then, this is witchcraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weirdguy0101</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weirdguy0101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:s6gO0bPIeBMJ:www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html+&amp;hl=en]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:s6gO0bPIeBMJ:www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html+&#038;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:s6gO0bPIeBMJ:www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html+&#038;hl=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot Phillips</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliot Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It still seems to come up for me. You can always try the coral cache:

http://www.seattlerobotics.org.nyud.net:8090/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still seems to come up for me. You can always try the coral cache:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seattlerobotics.org.nyud.net:8090/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.seattlerobotics.org.nyud.net:8090/encoder/200010/dlcsonar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon baker</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site has exceeded its bandwidth...Bummer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site has exceeded its bandwidth&#8230;Bummer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icwiener</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icwiener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[go to http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/
and click the link on the left.. worked for me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go to <a href="http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200010/</a><br />
and click the link on the left.. worked for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polaroid used to sell this ultrasonic module independently.  I even built a project around it back in 1994.  judging from the code in the linked article, the module from the camera is a little more usable.  the old module had separate pulse init and echo received lines, and the echo line would trip on the outgoing pulse, necessitating a delay before looking for the echo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polaroid used to sell this ultrasonic module independently.  I even built a project around it back in 1994.  judging from the code in the linked article, the module from the camera is a little more usable.  the old module had separate pulse init and echo received lines, and the echo line would trip on the outgoing pulse, necessitating a delay before looking for the echo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaser</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/comment-page-1/#comment-10504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/08/15/polaroid-sonar-for-robotics/#comment-10504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unavailable though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unavailable though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

