<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USB Bluetooth without sacrificing a port</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13674</guid>
		<description>I wonder how to do that, but it seems that the link is broken. I saw many articles explaining how to do that but sacrificing a port, so I finally just prefer to plug the dogle outside, then I always have the possibility to unplug it and use the port. But, if there is really a way to don&#039;t sacrifing a port, I&#039;m willing to know it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how to do that, but it seems that the link is broken. I saw many articles explaining how to do that but sacrificing a port, so I finally just prefer to plug the dogle outside, then I always have the possibility to unplug it and use the port. But, if there is really a way to don&#8217;t sacrifing a port, I&#8217;m willing to know it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reese</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13662</link>
		<dc:creator>reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13662</guid>
		<description>i feel empowered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i feel empowered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTheGeek</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13663</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTheGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13663</guid>
		<description>I just did this to my laptop, works great. You can read about it here: http://tomthegeek.blogspot.com/2005/12/adding-internal-bluetooth.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did this to my laptop, works great. You can read about it here: <a href="http://tomthegeek.blogspot.com/2005/12/adding-internal-bluetooth.html" rel="nofollow">http://tomthegeek.blogspot.com/2005/12/adding-internal-bluetooth.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired2</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13664</link>
		<dc:creator>Tired2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13664</guid>
		<description>girl hackers are hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>girl hackers are hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDE</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>CDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>In the case of the mac bluetooth she has linked, you don&#039;t always have to loose the usb connection on the outside. All you need is one of those small usb hubs, the ones that take one port and make them two. Then you cut the traces, solder the input to the hub to the trace, the first output to the bluetooth, and the second output to the usb connector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of the mac bluetooth she has linked, you don&#8217;t always have to loose the usb connection on the outside. All you need is one of those small usb hubs, the ones that take one port and make them two. Then you cut the traces, solder the input to the hub to the trace, the first output to the bluetooth, and the second output to the usb connector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaspel</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaspel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13665</guid>
		<description>Averatec has been doing that with wifi for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Averatec has been doing that with wifi for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnkgrl</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13667</link>
		<dc:creator>tnkgrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13667</guid>
		<description>#6, I considered it, but the Averatec 1050 is a small, light, (and cheap) ultra-portable notebook (10.6&quot; screen) without a lot of space inside. Beyond the space limitations, adding a hub inside in addition to the Bluetooh module would require traces to be cut (to one of the existing 2 USB ports) and would draw more power.

I like that this mod can be undone, and I like the 4+ hour battery life of this machine. Besides this hack is quite elegant :)

FYI, I dual boot Windows XP Pro and Mac OSX for Intel on this machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6, I considered it, but the Averatec 1050 is a small, light, (and cheap) ultra-portable notebook (10.6&#8243; screen) without a lot of space inside. Beyond the space limitations, adding a hub inside in addition to the Bluetooh module would require traces to be cut (to one of the existing 2 USB ports) and would draw more power.</p>
<p>I like that this mod can be undone, and I like the 4+ hour battery life of this machine. Besides this hack is quite elegant :)</p>
<p>FYI, I dual boot Windows XP Pro and Mac OSX for Intel on this machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ez</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13668</link>
		<dc:creator>ez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13668</guid>
		<description>internal bluetooth is cool but would a USB hub work for the more faint of heart?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>internal bluetooth is cool but would a USB hub work for the more faint of heart?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnkgrl</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13669</link>
		<dc:creator>tnkgrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13669</guid>
		<description>Wow... You posted my hack! Thanks :) Since you&#039;ve misspelled my handle (it&#039;s tnkgrl) you&#039;re welcome to update this post with my name (it&#039;s Myriam). And yes this is proof that there are girl hackers out there too -grin-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; You posted my hack! Thanks :) Since you&#8217;ve misspelled my handle (it&#8217;s tnkgrl) you&#8217;re welcome to update this post with my name (it&#8217;s Myriam). And yes this is proof that there are girl hackers out there too -grin-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13673</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13673</guid>
		<description>Nice work. I should have done something like that with my Media frame, rather than routing a hub back into the battery bay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work. I should have done something like that with my Media frame, rather than routing a hub back into the battery bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weirdguy0101</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13672</link>
		<dc:creator>weirdguy0101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13672</guid>
		<description>lol, my dell 4500 says 10 usb ports when only 4 are outside!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, my dell 4500 says 10 usb ports when only 4 are outside!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warchild</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13671</link>
		<dc:creator>warchild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13671</guid>
		<description>good job. I have an old Dell 8500 that has 2 external usb ports but 4 show up on the system manager. I think I might try this with them. THanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good job. I have an old Dell 8500 that has 2 external usb ports but 4 show up on the system manager. I think I might try this with them. THanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/comment-page-1/#comment-13670</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2005/10/22/usb-bluetooth-without-sacrificing-a-port/#comment-13670</guid>
		<description>great work! and first post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work! and first post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
