<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IR audio bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please pardon me, but where is the hack in this posting ?

This is on the same level as making an extension lead for a pair of headphones or resoldering a jackplug.

If my 13 year old daughter decided to do this I would think, good she is thinking for herself and I would encourage her.

But please it&#039;s embarrasing.

Rob...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please pardon me, but where is the hack in this posting ?</p>
<p>This is on the same level as making an extension lead for a pair of headphones or resoldering a jackplug.</p>
<p>If my 13 year old daughter decided to do this I would think, good she is thinking for herself and I would encourage her.</p>
<p>But please it&#8217;s embarrasing.</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pea</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aah i wouldn&#039;t go near those wireless head phones with a barge pole, 300% over priced. You&#039;re better off making a IR audio trans and receiver yourself, or even better, RF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aah i wouldn&#8217;t go near those wireless head phones with a barge pole, 300% over priced. You&#8217;re better off making a IR audio trans and receiver yourself, or even better, RF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has got to be the most boring &quot;hack&quot; ever. a 10 year old could have done this. You just simply taken the signal that would have been delivered to the speakers and wired them to a line out.

I come to this site to see hardcore hacks... not your simple hack... besides, you didn&#039;t even bild your own transformer... and a simple variable DC power supply could have probably drawn currnet anywhere from 12-24v from your speaker system... thus eliminating the need for batteries.

Out of 10, I rate this a -5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has got to be the most boring &#8220;hack&#8221; ever. a 10 year old could have done this. You just simply taken the signal that would have been delivered to the speakers and wired them to a line out.</p>
<p>I come to this site to see hardcore hacks&#8230; not your simple hack&#8230; besides, you didn&#8217;t even bild your own transformer&#8230; and a simple variable DC power supply could have probably drawn currnet anywhere from 12-24v from your speaker system&#8230; thus eliminating the need for batteries.</p>
<p>Out of 10, I rate this a -5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt sandy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt sandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think everyone has tried this before. It doesn&#039;t have the quality of the optical out, but the geek factor makes up for it when friends are over. There was a bluetooth one posted on engadget a while ago (maybe a week?). I do love this site though. MORE LASERS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone has tried this before. It doesn&#8217;t have the quality of the optical out, but the geek factor makes up for it when friends are over. There was a bluetooth one posted on engadget a while ago (maybe a week?). I do love this site though. MORE LASERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rybitski</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rybitski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The distortion on this is .9%, so the ir quality is not noticably bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distortion on this is .9%, so the ir quality is not noticably bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tau</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that hack not to long ago about using a laser for wireless sound?  Would that not result in better sound quality and less attenuation then IR?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that hack not to long ago about using a laser for wireless sound?  Would that not result in better sound quality and less attenuation then IR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired2</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tired2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I forgot to mention, I&#039;ve had pretty good success with ground loops between computer/stereo/tv by using an old peice of speaker wire and connecting it from computer chassis to stereo chassis, or tv coax ground.... kinda ghetto, but i think that is a lot of what the diy/hack scene is about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I forgot to mention, I&#8217;ve had pretty good success with ground loops between computer/stereo/tv by using an old peice of speaker wire and connecting it from computer chassis to stereo chassis, or tv coax ground&#8230;. kinda ghetto, but i think that is a lot of what the diy/hack scene is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired2</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tired2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think some people missed the idea of this hack... I always thought &#039;wireless&#039; speakers were a waste of money because they still had to be plugged in.... Though now in my current setup, wires are unacceptable for the rear speakers, so I&#039;m forced to run at 3.1 :(.... Anyway, this would be a great hack along side a diy amp or some computer speakers to re-claim those rear speakers... wonder how hard a full on DIY setup would be....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some people missed the idea of this hack&#8230; I always thought &#8216;wireless&#8217; speakers were a waste of money because they still had to be plugged in&#8230;. Though now in my current setup, wires are unacceptable for the rear speakers, so I&#8217;m forced to run at 3.1 :(&#8230;. Anyway, this would be a great hack along side a diy amp or some computer speakers to re-claim those rear speakers&#8230; wonder how hard a full on DIY setup would be&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orphaze</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orphaze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something like this has the indirect benefit of getting rid of those pesky ground loops that often arise when connecting a computer to a home theater system (especially if that system is attached to a grounded coax cable TV line as they usually are in some way.) I&#039;m not sure about other people, but coax isolation transformers degraded my signal too much, even with an amp boosting the signal beforehand. Never tried an AC isotrans though.

I ended up solving my problems by grounding my computer (a MythTV box) to the coax (a debatable but fuctional solution.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something like this has the indirect benefit of getting rid of those pesky ground loops that often arise when connecting a computer to a home theater system (especially if that system is attached to a grounded coax cable TV line as they usually are in some way.) I&#8217;m not sure about other people, but coax isolation transformers degraded my signal too much, even with an amp boosting the signal beforehand. Never tried an AC isotrans though.</p>
<p>I ended up solving my problems by grounding my computer (a MythTV box) to the coax (a debatable but fuctional solution.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atrain</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atrain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just use a patch cable... But if you do need a long distance link, this is a great + simple solution.

I would not use IR in this case though, I would rather a higher quality link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use a patch cable&#8230; But if you do need a long distance link, this is a great + simple solution.</p>
<p>I would not use IR in this case though, I would rather a higher quality link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joakim Arfvidsson</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-17491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joakim Arfvidsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/03/01/ir-audio-bridge/#comment-17491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about sound quality? The degradation is at best negligible, but might be considerable. If I were to hook up something permanent, I would definitely not go with anything that requires line of sight]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about sound quality? The degradation is at best negligible, but might be considerable. If I were to hook up something permanent, I would definitely not go with anything that requires line of sight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

