<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap tilt-shift photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon gummer</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simon gummer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi &lt;br&gt;i too am longing to try and make this tilt-shift lens but the link given goes to a &#039;page not found&#039; message on a site called livebooks. if anyone has a correct link or can send a word document etc that would be really cool...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <br />i too am longing to try and make this tilt-shift lens but the link given goes to a &#8216;page not found&#8217; message on a site called livebooks. if anyone has a correct link or can send a word document etc that would be really cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danette5</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danette5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to know how to do this. Will you send me the instructions so that I can try it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to know how to do this. Will you send me the instructions so that I can try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Elliot,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve been longing to make a tilt shift lens myself and everybody is reffering to your article.The only problem is that it isn&#039;t appear to be working.... could you please send me a word or PDF document where you explain it once again, it would make me a happy man :).&lt;br&gt;Keep up the good work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br&gt;Lucas Eikemans&lt;br&gt;The Netherlands]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Elliot,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been longing to make a tilt shift lens myself and everybody is reffering to your article.The only problem is that it isn&#8217;t appear to be working&#8230;. could you please send me a word or PDF document where you explain it once again, it would make me a happy man :).<br />Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />Lucas Eikemans<br />The Netherlands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! What a great little hack. i was wondering what lens i should get to try this for myself. I just got a Canon Rebel XT, so what size lens should I get since I&#039;m not all too sure about the aspect or size of &quot;film&quot; for digital cameras. Thanks for the help...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What a great little hack. i was wondering what lens i should get to try this for myself. I just got a Canon Rebel XT, so what size lens should I get since I&#8217;m not all too sure about the aspect or size of &#8220;film&#8221; for digital cameras. Thanks for the help&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photozz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[photozz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making a tilt-shift like this will in no way &quot;screw up&quot; any digital Canon body that I know of. They will fire with the lens off just fine. Put the camera into Shutter Priority, or Manual mode. I recomend manual, and play with the shutter speed. The exposure meeter seems to get thrown off pretty easy if there is a little light leak arount the edge. The only way you could break something is if you actualy started cutting on the body itself, or made the body-cap end out of metal and shorted the contacts or something lame like that. I have actualy removed the stock lens and reversed it. Just holding it against the body. It&#039;s an old school way to do macro photography.   few examples here of the reveresed lens. http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/32226927/
So firing with the lens off is fine. Just don&#039;t short anything out, and use the right mode on the camera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making a tilt-shift like this will in no way &#8220;screw up&#8221; any digital Canon body that I know of. They will fire with the lens off just fine. Put the camera into Shutter Priority, or Manual mode. I recomend manual, and play with the shutter speed. The exposure meeter seems to get thrown off pretty easy if there is a little light leak arount the edge. The only way you could break something is if you actualy started cutting on the body itself, or made the body-cap end out of metal and shorted the contacts or something lame like that. I have actualy removed the stock lens and reversed it. Just holding it against the body. It&#8217;s an old school way to do macro photography.   few examples here of the reveresed lens. <a href="http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/32226927/" rel="nofollow">http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/32226927/</a><br />
So firing with the lens off is fine. Just don&#8217;t short anything out, and use the right mode on the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Bates</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia Bates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually this SHOULD in theory work. There is a company out there that has one of these for sale. It is called lensbaby.
http://www.lensbabies.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this SHOULD in theory work. There is a company out there that has one of these for sale. It is called lensbaby.<br />
<a href="http://www.lensbabies.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lensbabies.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot Phillips</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliot Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it will be pretty unlikely that that particular situation will ever arise, but if it does we&#039;re protected from AOL pulling the site&#039;s plug since they don&#039;t own us.

Hack-A-Day is not and will never be part of AOL. I hope to continue writing here for many, many years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will be pretty unlikely that that particular situation will ever arise, but if it does we&#8217;re protected from AOL pulling the site&#8217;s plug since they don&#8217;t own us.</p>
<p>Hack-A-Day is not and will never be part of AOL. I hope to continue writing here for many, many years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;been too busy ripping off digg to post on a much better site I see!&quot;

If this was digg I would digg down your comment; why are people so negative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;been too busy ripping off digg to post on a much better site I see!&#8221;</p>
<p>If this was digg I would digg down your comment; why are people so negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markie</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[okay, cool

one more thing though

in this post on Jason&#039;s blog it says

http://www.calacanis.com/2005/10/11/hackaday-stays-indie/

&quot;Brian and I felt it would only be a matter of time before someone posted (in a blog post or a comment) &quot;how to hack your INSERT_AOL_product_here&quot; or &quot;How to hack INSERT_AOL_partner_product_here.&quot; If and when this happened we would wind up fighting with ourselves&quot;

Well, since you&#039;re the only employee now, who&#039;s also got a substantial income from AOL/Netscape, the question is: what would you do if the above scenario happened? (since that scenario seems to be one of the reasons to keep had independent, right?)

...and I don&#039;t want to be rude or anything, but what&#039;s the independance of had from aol worth when you, as the only employee, are not independent from aol?

(and don&#039;t get me wrong here, it&#039;s not me demanding that independance(although it would be nice), it&#039;s something had/weblogs inc. claimed, that&#039;s all)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, cool</p>
<p>one more thing though</p>
<p>in this post on Jason&#8217;s blog it says</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2005/10/11/hackaday-stays-indie/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calacanis.com/2005/10/11/hackaday-stays-indie/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Brian and I felt it would only be a matter of time before someone posted (in a blog post or a comment) &#8220;how to hack your INSERT_AOL_product_here&#8221; or &#8220;How to hack INSERT_AOL_partner_product_here.&#8221; If and when this happened we would wind up fighting with ourselves&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, since you&#8217;re the only employee now, who&#8217;s also got a substantial income from AOL/Netscape, the question is: what would you do if the above scenario happened? (since that scenario seems to be one of the reasons to keep had independent, right?)</p>
<p>&#8230;and I don&#8217;t want to be rude or anything, but what&#8217;s the independance of had from aol worth when you, as the only employee, are not independent from aol?</p>
<p>(and don&#8217;t get me wrong here, it&#8217;s not me demanding that independance(although it would be nice), it&#8217;s something had/weblogs inc. claimed, that&#8217;s all)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliot Phillips</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliot Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be happy to clear this up for you Markie. Hack-A-Day is an independent company now. It along with blogmaverick.com (Mark Cuban&#039;s blog) were the only two properties in the Weblogs, Inc. network that weren&#039;t sold to AOL. (Weblogs, Inc. is still managed as an independent company though) Our large number of readers and traffic means that Hack-A-Day can pay for itself. It&#039;s my part-time job. My full-time job now is working for Netscape. I&#039;ve been getting paid separately by Hack-A-Day and AOL since last October (since I was an Engadget employee).

The bottom line is this: Hack-A-Day is an independent company and since I&#039;m the only employee, I can pretty much do whatever I want with it.

Thank you readers for keeping us a viable company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be happy to clear this up for you Markie. Hack-A-Day is an independent company now. It along with blogmaverick.com (Mark Cuban&#8217;s blog) were the only two properties in the Weblogs, Inc. network that weren&#8217;t sold to AOL. (Weblogs, Inc. is still managed as an independent company though) Our large number of readers and traffic means that Hack-A-Day can pay for itself. It&#8217;s my part-time job. My full-time job now is working for Netscape. I&#8217;ve been getting paid separately by Hack-A-Day and AOL since last October (since I was an Engadget employee).</p>
<p>The bottom line is this: Hack-A-Day is an independent company and since I&#8217;m the only employee, I can pretty much do whatever I want with it.</p>
<p>Thank you readers for keeping us a viable company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trebuchet03</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trebuchet03]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#9 @Mr. Spork

Yeah, that&#039;s how I know it does not work :P But, I found out that a friend&#039;s camera (same exact model) does allow it to happen without a cap... I&#039;m going to make some phone calls and see if its some stupid setting :P I know its hackaday -- but I think andrew might agree: its not worth F&#039;ing up this kind of camera.

I do have a Nikon F2 (old school for some :P)... so I think I&#039;ll have to clean her up to use this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#9 @Mr. Spork</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s how I know it does not work :P But, I found out that a friend&#8217;s camera (same exact model) does allow it to happen without a cap&#8230; I&#8217;m going to make some phone calls and see if its some stupid setting :P I know its hackaday &#8212; but I think andrew might agree: its not worth F&#8217;ing up this kind of camera.</p>
<p>I do have a Nikon F2 (old school for some :P)&#8230; so I think I&#8217;ll have to clean her up to use this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markie</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(off topic)

&gt;odd, i thought hack-a-day was -not- acquired by AOL...

&gt;It&#039;s not. I am working full time for Netscape though.

Oh, that&#039;s a crystal-clear answer... If I&#039;m not mistaking, Netscape is an AOL-company, beta.netscape.com is Jason Calacanis&#039; new startup, who is the CEO of Weblogs Inc., which got aquired by AOL and now you&#039;re hired by Netscape...

Now where exactly does this make hack-a-day independent and/or non-AOL? cause I&#039;m not seeing it... and I don&#039;t care that much for it either, it&#039;s just that this site itself has claimed to be independent and non-AOL a while ago:

http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000283062901/

...which, as I read it now, puzzles me even more, cause how independent (from AOL) can a site be when it&#039;s topblogger get&#039;s paid full-time by an AOL-company?

...to me it sounds more like a statement for trying to keep some credibility than the true motivation behind all this... Imho and as far as I can see it&#039;s AOL-dollars all over the place... but of course, I could be wrong.

good luck on what you&#039;re doing though]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(off topic)</p>
<p>>odd, i thought hack-a-day was -not- acquired by AOL&#8230;</p>
<p>>It&#8217;s not. I am working full time for Netscape though.</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s a crystal-clear answer&#8230; If I&#8217;m not mistaking, Netscape is an AOL-company, beta.netscape.com is Jason Calacanis&#8217; new startup, who is the CEO of Weblogs Inc., which got aquired by AOL and now you&#8217;re hired by Netscape&#8230;</p>
<p>Now where exactly does this make hack-a-day independent and/or non-AOL? cause I&#8217;m not seeing it&#8230; and I don&#8217;t care that much for it either, it&#8217;s just that this site itself has claimed to be independent and non-AOL a while ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000283062901/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000283062901/</a></p>
<p>&#8230;which, as I read it now, puzzles me even more, cause how independent (from AOL) can a site be when it&#8217;s topblogger get&#8217;s paid full-time by an AOL-company?</p>
<p>&#8230;to me it sounds more like a statement for trying to keep some credibility than the true motivation behind all this&#8230; Imho and as far as I can see it&#8217;s AOL-dollars all over the place&#8230; but of course, I could be wrong.</p>
<p>good luck on what you&#8217;re doing though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Spork</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Spork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@trebuchet03

Well, you can find out pretty easily if you just remove the lens and try to release the shutter. If it works, great, if not, it&#039;s probably a pretty simple matter of defeating an interlock switch or shorting a couple contacts.

What? You are reading &quot;hack-a-day&quot; you know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@trebuchet03</p>
<p>Well, you can find out pretty easily if you just remove the lens and try to release the shutter. If it works, great, if not, it&#8217;s probably a pretty simple matter of defeating an interlock switch or shorting a couple contacts.</p>
<p>What? You are reading &#8220;hack-a-day&#8221; you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: android cat</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[android cat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I seem to be getting that effect from the cheap plastic lens on my $25 Radio Shack &quot;spy camera&quot;:
http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/RogerRamdrive/Vespa0825.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to be getting that effect from the cheap plastic lens on my $25 Radio Shack &#8220;spy camera&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/RogerRamdrive/Vespa0825.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h233/RogerRamdrive/Vespa0825.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-19865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/06/15/cheap-tilt-shift-photography/#comment-19865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effects are great! I would not want to try this with a real good camera though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effects are great! I would not want to try this with a real good camera though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

