<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defcon bot rules announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: petestrash</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23613</link>
		<dc:creator>petestrash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23613</guid>
		<description>From the SCORING rules &quot;There may be black negative point targets to discourage random firing and shotguns&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So some of the suggestions for mass firing wouldn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the SCORING rules &#8220;There may be black negative point targets to discourage random firing and shotguns&#8221;.</p>
<p>So some of the suggestions for mass firing wouldn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23612</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23612</guid>
		<description>best idea: flaming gnomes!&lt;br&gt;hm, i bet it&#039;d be really easy to make somthing that works good, have a pulsed red led and webcam to aquire targets so it doesnt mistake somthing else for a target(is target round? check is target red? check is target flashing at a predefined rate KILL), switch to laser mode, aim and shoot&lt;br&gt;as it&#039;d be automated in software i bet we could chuck gnomes at the targets pretty accuratly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>best idea: flaming gnomes!<br />hm, i bet it&#8217;d be really easy to make somthing that works good, have a pulsed red led and webcam to aquire targets so it doesnt mistake somthing else for a target(is target round? check is target red? check is target flashing at a predefined rate KILL), switch to laser mode, aim and shoot<br />as it&#8217;d be automated in software i bet we could chuck gnomes at the targets pretty accuratly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Hacker</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23611</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Hacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23611</guid>
		<description>Better idea: flaming paint balls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better idea: flaming paint balls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antis</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23610</link>
		<dc:creator>antis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23610</guid>
		<description>idea: flaming airsorft pellets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idea: flaming airsorft pellets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGBM</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23609</link>
		<dc:creator>TGBM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23609</guid>
		<description>Or you could just have your bot shoot the opponents bot and leave it at that...it looks like fun prehaps just an automatic gun that sweeps back and forth in a pattern until stopped would be more effective than a sniper type gun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could just have your bot shoot the opponents bot and leave it at that&#8230;it looks like fun prehaps just an automatic gun that sweeps back and forth in a pattern until stopped would be more effective than a sniper type gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gumnos</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23608</link>
		<dc:creator>gumnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23608</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a great opportunity try and figure out how to project spots (laser?  flashlight?) on the opponent&#039;s side to confuse their bot.  You don&#039;t have to knock down all the targets...just more than your opponent.  If your opponent&#039;s bot is busy chasing projected spots rather than real targets.  Or perhaps even have an arm that disrupts your opponent&#039;s bot?  There doens&#039;t seem to be any rule that I noticed that prevents you from interfering with your opponent (as long as you don&#039;t cross the firing line)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great opportunity try and figure out how to project spots (laser?  flashlight?) on the opponent&#8217;s side to confuse their bot.  You don&#8217;t have to knock down all the targets&#8230;just more than your opponent.  If your opponent&#8217;s bot is busy chasing projected spots rather than real targets.  Or perhaps even have an arm that disrupts your opponent&#8217;s bot?  There doens&#8217;t seem to be any rule that I noticed that prevents you from interfering with your opponent (as long as you don&#8217;t cross the firing line)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. S.</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23607</link>
		<dc:creator>F. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23607</guid>
		<description>I, for one, welcome our gun-toting robot overlords. As a snitch, I may be helpful in rounding up other humans to lead them to their slaughter. In return, I only require insertion back into the Matrix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, welcome our gun-toting robot overlords. As a snitch, I may be helpful in rounding up other humans to lead them to their slaughter. In return, I only require insertion back into the Matrix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olliestyles</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-23606</link>
		<dc:creator>olliestyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/02/defcon-bot-rules-announced/#comment-23606</guid>
		<description>first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
