<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY Canon lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24049</link>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24049</guid>
		<description>Tek.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The EOS 50mm f/1.2 lens will go for around $1.5k.The FD 50mm f/1.2 lens can be had for $70 (what I paid including shipping on ebay).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, why a f/1.2 lens?   The short depth of field results in a very distinctive look to the photos.   It also takes in a lot of light, so it can be used in low-light circumstances without having to resort to a flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tek.</p>
<p>The EOS 50mm f/1.2 lens will go for around $1.5k.The FD 50mm f/1.2 lens can be had for $70 (what I paid including shipping on ebay).</p>
<p>Now, why a f/1.2 lens?   The short depth of field results in a very distinctive look to the photos.   It also takes in a lot of light, so it can be used in low-light circumstances without having to resort to a flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tek</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24048</link>
		<dc:creator>tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24048</guid>
		<description>Huh? A 50mm f1.2 FD mount lens is somehow better than a 50mm prime EOS mount lens? For all the trouble that it&#039;s worth, I don&#039;t see how it&#039;s in any way beneficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? A 50mm f1.2 FD mount lens is somehow better than a 50mm prime EOS mount lens? For all the trouble that it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s in any way beneficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24047</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24047</guid>
		<description>Neat, I need to pick up a fast lens that has a aperature of 1.8 sometime soon, my f2.8 can do a lot, but still has troubles at concerts sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat, I need to pick up a fast lens that has a aperature of 1.8 sometime soon, my f2.8 can do a lot, but still has troubles at concerts sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neg</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24046</link>
		<dc:creator>neg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24046</guid>
		<description>WE WANT CONTEST ENTRIES!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--neg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WE WANT CONTEST ENTRIES!</p>
<p>&#8211;neg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: optV</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24045</link>
		<dc:creator>optV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24045</guid>
		<description>Ah nm, I just reread it. It was an FD to EOS conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah nm, I just reread it. It was an FD to EOS conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: optV</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-24044</link>
		<dc:creator>optV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2006/12/30/diy-canon-lenses/#comment-24044</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t figure out if the 50 f/1.2 is modded somehow? He said he made the macro from the 50 f/1.8 + an 18-55 ef-s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t figure out if the 50 f/1.2 is modded somehow? He said he made the macro from the 50 f/1.8 + an 18-55 ef-s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
