<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Entries: Almost done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: person</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25083</link>
		<dc:creator>person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25083</guid>
		<description>The NOPPP is ancient.I made one a long time ago. I don&#039;t understand why it wasn&#039;t more popular. I got the source code for the linux driver for it somewhere. I made some changes to the code to add the 16f628 .I programmed and verified a 16f628 chip with it but never tested the chip or made a circuit with it to check if it was programmed right. Does anyone know why it would NOT program a 16f628 or others if the code was updated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NOPPP is ancient.I made one a long time ago. I don&#8217;t understand why it wasn&#8217;t more popular. I got the source code for the linux driver for it somewhere. I made some changes to the code to add the 16f628 .I programmed and verified a 16f628 chip with it but never tested the chip or made a circuit with it to check if it was programmed right. Does anyone know why it would NOT program a 16f628 or others if the code was updated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25082</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25082</guid>
		<description>Very nice to hear! I suppose essential info for everyone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice to hear! I suppose essential info for everyone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25081</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25081</guid>
		<description>That G-Force meter would be even better if it had acceleration and deceleration g-meters as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That G-Force meter would be even better if it had acceleration and deceleration g-meters as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chupa</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25080</link>
		<dc:creator>chupa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25080</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;its been done and posted here before i guess is what hes trying to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/" rel="nofollow">http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/</a></p>
<p>its been done and posted here before i guess is what hes trying to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25079</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25079</guid>
		<description>@nexis - the circuits and bootloader firmwares are the same because they&#039;re both built from the same reference design - the official Microchip FS USB demo board.  The design contest guidelines asked for a &#039;useful circuit&#039;, and &#039;proto board&#039; was a suggestion.  The purpose of my entry is a compact prototyping board for those interested in PIC USB interfacing, not a novel design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nexis &#8211; the circuits and bootloader firmwares are the same because they&#8217;re both built from the same reference design &#8211; the official Microchip FS USB demo board.  The design contest guidelines asked for a &#8216;useful circuit&#8217;, and &#8216;proto board&#8217; was a suggestion.  The purpose of my entry is a compact prototyping board for those interested in PIC USB interfacing, not a novel design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nexis</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/comment-page-1/#comment-25078</link>
		<dc:creator>nexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/02/26/dc-entries-almost-done/#comment-25078</guid>
		<description>ok, just to point out, the 18f4550 project is the same thing as the create USB device.  this is not a new project, his schematic is the same, and there are only 3 lines of code in the boot loader changed.    hope this is not the winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, just to point out, the 18f4550 project is the same thing as the create USB device.  this is not a new project, his schematic is the same, and there are only 3 lines of code in the boot loader changed.    hope this is not the winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
