<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serial port power booster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Double plus good, this!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now all we need is a current limited/fused molex connector for the rear-of-case and we can feed all our amp&#039;ed gadgets. I&#039;ve been toying around with the idea to get rid of those USB power overcurrent/spike issues. Of course someone should make a laptop release as well for  the mobile toolkits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double plus good, this!</p>
<p>Now all we need is a current limited/fused molex connector for the rear-of-case and we can feed all our amp&#8217;ed gadgets. I&#8217;ve been toying around with the idea to get rid of those USB power overcurrent/spike issues. Of course someone should make a laptop release as well for  the mobile toolkits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threepointone</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threepointone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, there&#039;s really not much of a reason to use the max205/203 here. The only reason for Maxim integrating the caps is more to reduce the board space used, and I don&#039;t see this power booster as having portable requirements.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think calling this a &quot;power booster&quot; is a bit of a misnomer. As I understand, the problem with using portable programmers is not so much the lack of power but the lack of voltage--you need to boost those roughly-ttl level signals from the usb-rs232 adapters to rs232 levels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve made one of these before with the max232 chip, and the biggest problem I have with them is that you still need an external +5V power source. I think a really great project would be one which draws power off one of the unused RS-232 lines and trickle charges a supercap (you could try a used line, but then you&#039;d have to do something about the ~1F of capacitance slowing down the signals. . .) You might need a boost regulator to charge at ~5.5V and then use a LDO again for the MAX232 chip. I haven&#039;t done the calculations, but I&#039;m pretty sure that a programmer that uses about 20mA + MAX232 (uses]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, there&#8217;s really not much of a reason to use the max205/203 here. The only reason for Maxim integrating the caps is more to reduce the board space used, and I don&#8217;t see this power booster as having portable requirements.</p>
<p>I think calling this a &#8220;power booster&#8221; is a bit of a misnomer. As I understand, the problem with using portable programmers is not so much the lack of power but the lack of voltage&#8211;you need to boost those roughly-ttl level signals from the usb-rs232 adapters to rs232 levels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made one of these before with the max232 chip, and the biggest problem I have with them is that you still need an external +5V power source. I think a really great project would be one which draws power off one of the unused RS-232 lines and trickle charges a supercap (you could try a used line, but then you&#8217;d have to do something about the ~1F of capacitance slowing down the signals. . .) You might need a boost regulator to charge at ~5.5V and then use a LDO again for the MAX232 chip. I haven&#8217;t done the calculations, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that a programmer that uses about 20mA + MAX232 (uses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex mccown</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex mccown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 23:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my &quot;super multi programmer&quot; KILLS my *new* laptops battery i also am in the middle of makeing an extended bat but this is good and i have like 100 max 232s and 1uf caps so im coverd with that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my &#8220;super multi programmer&#8221; KILLS my *new* laptops battery i also am in the middle of makeing an extended bat but this is good and i have like 100 max 232s and 1uf caps so im coverd with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spaceball1</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceball1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hum the max205 or max203 dont need caps, but it&#039;s cost an arm or a leg for it.  It&#039;s just cheaper to get max232 and caps to keep costs low (granted a little more work.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hum the max205 or max203 dont need caps, but it&#8217;s cost an arm or a leg for it.  It&#8217;s just cheaper to get max232 and caps to keep costs low (granted a little more work.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfmankurd</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfmankurd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 13:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need one of these for my pic programmer too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need one of these for my pic programmer too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-parrot</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/comment-page-1/#comment-26365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ex-parrot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 06:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/05/19/serial-port-power-booster/#comment-26365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a fantastic idea!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fantastic idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

