<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSA@home (DIY shared FPGA cracker)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FPGA Design</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FPGA Design]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool and very well documented. &lt;br&gt;BTW greate place to find more boards is FPGA Central www.fpgacentral.com and look for product central.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool and very well documented. <br />BTW greate place to find more boards is FPGA Central <a href="http://www.fpgacentral.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fpgacentral.com</a> and look for product central.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MegaKitsune</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MegaKitsune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a physics major, nor am I even good at math beyond algebra. But you say &quot;FPGA SHA-1 hash cracker&quot; and I say &quot;[skylark] for prez!&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously people, this is a website. It is on the internet. The internet contains a lot of websites. Some sites explain things. USE THEM. &gt;_]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a physics major, nor am I even good at math beyond algebra. But you say &#8220;FPGA SHA-1 hash cracker&#8221; and I say &#8220;[skylark] for prez!&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Seriously people, this is a website. It is on the internet. The internet contains a lot of websites. Some sites explain things. USE THEM. >_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny B. Goode</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny B. Goode]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted this would be a bit different, but I wonder what it would take to implement something along the same lines as this project using GPUs. nVidia appears to be doing something similar with it&#039;s Tesla line(see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html&lt;/a&gt;) I can see a lot of challenges with trying to do something like that, but it would make a helluva number cruncher, and you could take out your furnace to make room and heat your house with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted this would be a bit different, but I wonder what it would take to implement something along the same lines as this project using GPUs. nVidia appears to be doing something similar with it&#8217;s Tesla line(see <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html</a>) I can see a lot of challenges with trying to do something like that, but it would make a helluva number cruncher, and you could take out your furnace to make room and heat your house with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those new to fpga&#039;s, check out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fpga4fun.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fpga4fun.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;V2P parts are pricey, and in the old days ISE wasn&#039;t free, but it&#039;s a changing world.&lt;br&gt;In time FPGA&#039;s will become a standard part on every PC motherboard (and since at least virtex2pro parts contain 405 ppc cores, they can run linux, etc).  But for now the problem is the cost.   Blame that one on Xilinx, Altera, Lattice, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember that ridiculously expensive GNU USRP?  It&#039;s a low end Altera Cyclone glued together with some really fast ADCs, that&#039;s about it.  This thing&#039;s far more useful, powerful, and cost effective.  Cool project and great find!&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those new to fpga&#8217;s, check out:<br /><a href="http://www.fpga4fun.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fpga4fun.com/</a></p>
<p>V2P parts are pricey, and in the old days ISE wasn&#8217;t free, but it&#8217;s a changing world.<br />In time FPGA&#8217;s will become a standard part on every PC motherboard (and since at least virtex2pro parts contain 405 ppc cores, they can run linux, etc).  But for now the problem is the cost.   Blame that one on Xilinx, Altera, Lattice, etc.</p>
<p>Remember that ridiculously expensive GNU USRP?  It&#8217;s a low end Altera Cyclone glued together with some really fast ADCs, that&#8217;s about it.  This thing&#8217;s far more useful, powerful, and cost effective.  Cool project and great find!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian redbeard</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brian redbeard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for those of you unfamiliar with this, you need to take a step back and simply install linux.  i know this sounds stupid, but one of simple things anyone worth their salt does it pull an md5 or sha1 of the iso and compares it with the info available from the &#039;manufacturer&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if you&#039;re unfamiliar with this i guess you&#039;re up shit&#039;s creek.  trust me though, i feel for you.  don&#039;t worry, one day there&#039;s going to be a huge network of computers.  and when that day comes, it will be almost like there is a web of information available, world wide!  it&#039;ll be crazy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for those of you unfamiliar with this, you need to take a step back and simply install linux.  i know this sounds stupid, but one of simple things anyone worth their salt does it pull an md5 or sha1 of the iso and compares it with the info available from the &#8216;manufacturer&#8217;.</p>
<p>if you&#8217;re unfamiliar with this i guess you&#8217;re up shit&#8217;s creek.  trust me though, i feel for you.  don&#8217;t worry, one day there&#8217;s going to be a huge network of computers.  and when that day comes, it will be almost like there is a web of information available, world wide!  it&#8217;ll be crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sackofcatfood</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sackofcatfood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@19 I have no delusion that that Joe Schmoe should be able to *do* everything that is ever posted.  I wouldn&#039;t expect Joe Schmoe to be able to do a tenth of what&#039;s posted... Joe Schmoe has never held a soldering iron.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I see no reason to purposely exclude him (and even more experienced persons) from understanding what a project is about if it can be avoided.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think I&#039;ll jump out of the fray now that the trolls have shown up.  But, contrary to what the previous troll suggested, I had no problem with the summary (I have worked with fpgas before) but that does not preven me from identifying the problem which I think was more than proved by posts 3,4, and 6.  If it wasn&#039;t an issue, those posts would not have happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@19 I have no delusion that that Joe Schmoe should be able to *do* everything that is ever posted.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect Joe Schmoe to be able to do a tenth of what&#8217;s posted&#8230; Joe Schmoe has never held a soldering iron.</p>
<p>But I see no reason to purposely exclude him (and even more experienced persons) from understanding what a project is about if it can be avoided.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll jump out of the fray now that the trolls have shown up.  But, contrary to what the previous troll suggested, I had no problem with the summary (I have worked with fpgas before) but that does not preven me from identifying the problem which I think was more than proved by posts 3,4, and 6.  If it wasn&#8217;t an issue, those posts would not have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesus Christ sackofcatfood go read a book and stop pissing in the cereal.  For a physics major you sure do whine like a little girl when someone talks about something you don&#039;t understand.  BTW, the appropriate response of a tool is, &quot;zOMG, where are the LEDs???&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ sackofcatfood go read a book and stop pissing in the cereal.  For a physics major you sure do whine like a little girl when someone talks about something you don&#8217;t understand.  BTW, the appropriate response of a tool is, &#8220;zOMG, where are the LEDs???&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pomel</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pomel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a physics major.  But, I thought the summary was quite clear.  Nice job Skylark!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a physics major.  But, I thought the summary was quite clear.  Nice job Skylark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icepacks</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Icepacks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t know anything close to what it is, what use will you get from it? No one should be able to do everything posted on this website. If you do want to be able to do everything, it&#039;s gonna be a lot more work then just a hobby.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t know anything close to what it is, what use will you get from it? No one should be able to do everything posted on this website. If you do want to be able to do everything, it&#8217;s gonna be a lot more work then just a hobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sackofcatfood</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sackofcatfood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the summary admittedly sucks pretty bad.  Saying something like &quot;do it yourself board to crack password hashes using FPGA chips&quot;  would have been pretty intuitive even if I didn&#039;t know what a hash was or what FPGA stood for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;a pair of defective hdtv processing boards into his very own fpga sha-1 hash cracker&quot; is pure suck.  WTF is a &#039;fpga sha-1 hash&#039;?  In this case, I have to *already know* what everything is to make sense of the sentence.  And why the h*** does the summary talk about &quot;15 virtex-ii pro fpgs and 5 spartan-ii fpgas&quot;?  I expect to find that out on the project page.  In the &quot;summary&quot; it just further confuses people who don&#039;t know what an FPGA is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Generally, I get by pretty fine... I&#039;m a physics major who does EE as a hobby.  But man, sometimes even I can&#039;t get through the introductions... not everyone who hacks has a master&#039;s in EE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The summary should communicate (1) what it is (2) what it accomplishes (3) what I could use it for.  Once I know that, I&#039;ll be more than glad to spend X hours deciphering the project page (if it seems useful to me).  But it&#039;s ridiculous to say people should have to pull out the wikis and google just to figure out what the summary is talking about.  That completely defeats the purpose of a summary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the summary admittedly sucks pretty bad.  Saying something like &#8220;do it yourself board to crack password hashes using FPGA chips&#8221;  would have been pretty intuitive even if I didn&#8217;t know what a hash was or what FPGA stood for.</p>
<p>&#8220;a pair of defective hdtv processing boards into his very own fpga sha-1 hash cracker&#8221; is pure suck.  WTF is a &#8216;fpga sha-1 hash&#8217;?  In this case, I have to *already know* what everything is to make sense of the sentence.  And why the h*** does the summary talk about &#8220;15 virtex-ii pro fpgs and 5 spartan-ii fpgas&#8221;?  I expect to find that out on the project page.  In the &#8220;summary&#8221; it just further confuses people who don&#8217;t know what an FPGA is.</p>
<p>Generally, I get by pretty fine&#8230; I&#8217;m a physics major who does EE as a hobby.  But man, sometimes even I can&#8217;t get through the introductions&#8230; not everyone who hacks has a master&#8217;s in EE.</p>
<p>The summary should communicate (1) what it is (2) what it accomplishes (3) what I could use it for.  Once I know that, I&#8217;ll be more than glad to spend X hours deciphering the project page (if it seems useful to me).  But it&#8217;s ridiculous to say people should have to pull out the wikis and google just to figure out what the summary is talking about.  That completely defeats the purpose of a summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry99705</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barry99705]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Church of Wifi used a fpga chipped cluster to create their 40Gb wpa-psk hash table.  Took it 3 days to create with a 1 million dictionary file and the top 1000 ssid&#039;s on Wigle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.churchofwifi.org/Project_Display.asp?PID=90&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.churchofwifi.org/Project_Display.asp?PID=90&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Church of Wifi used a fpga chipped cluster to create their 40Gb wpa-psk hash table.  Took it 3 days to create with a 1 million dictionary file and the top 1000 ssid&#8217;s on Wigle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.churchofwifi.org/Project_Display.asp?PID=90" rel="nofollow">http://www.churchofwifi.org/Project_Display.asp?PID=90</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Bilos</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bart Bilos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply WOW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His tool to figure out device pinouts is extremly useful. I think it is time to look for equipment on ebay with lots of FPGA&#039;s. Lots of older high end router and switching equipment contain Virtex or Virtex-E FPGA&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Combined with these tools it would be very useful to repurpose them this way... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beats also the somewhat expensive prices for FPGA development boards. Altough he used defective boards but with recent FPGA&#039;s, one big advantage of using older equipment is that you knew it was in working order when it was decomissioned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too bad shipping from US locations to europe is so expensive...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply WOW.</p>
<p>His tool to figure out device pinouts is extremly useful. I think it is time to look for equipment on ebay with lots of FPGA&#8217;s. Lots of older high end router and switching equipment contain Virtex or Virtex-E FPGA&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Combined with these tools it would be very useful to repurpose them this way&#8230; </p>
<p>Beats also the somewhat expensive prices for FPGA development boards. Altough he used defective boards but with recent FPGA&#8217;s, one big advantage of using older equipment is that you knew it was in working order when it was decomissioned.</p>
<p>Too bad shipping from US locations to europe is so expensive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitewiz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whitewiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@risc&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It can generate tables fÃ¶r SHA-1 and MD5/ crack them in real time. I guess? Not sure about the tables. But since it has usb, maby.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also noted he will set up a Web interface for people to send in their own hashes for decryption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@risc</p>
<p>It can generate tables fÃ¶r SHA-1 and MD5/ crack them in real time. I guess? Not sure about the tables. But since it has usb, maby.</p>
<p>He also noted he will set up a Web interface for people to send in their own hashes for decryption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miknix</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miknix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made some lazy calculations for SHA1 just for fun:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The FPGA bruteforcer is capable of 3.257.812.230 c/s.&lt;br&gt;My Athlon64 3400+ is is capable of 1.915.000 c/s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impressive Oo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made some lazy calculations for SHA1 just for fun:</p>
<p>The FPGA bruteforcer is capable of 3.257.812.230 c/s.<br />My Athlon64 3400+ is is capable of 1.915.000 c/s.</p>
<p>Impressive Oo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/comment-page-1/#comment-28188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2007/08/31/nsahome-diy-shared-fpga-cracker/#comment-28188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[holy cow batman!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy cow batman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

