<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallel port logic analyzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hinner</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-67237</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-67237</guid>
		<description>You might be interested in yet-another-slow-logic analyzer I have created today: http://martin.hinner.info/electronics/piclogix/

The difference between those linked in this article and comments is that mine is standalone, i.e. requires no PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in yet-another-slow-logic analyzer I have created today: <a href="http://martin.hinner.info/electronics/piclogix/" rel="nofollow">http://martin.hinner.info/electronics/piclogix/</a></p>
<p>The difference between those linked in this article and comments is that mine is standalone, i.e. requires no PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penjuin</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31490</link>
		<dc:creator>penjuin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31490</guid>
		<description>Cheers, will build one this weekend. Should last me until I can scrounge the cash for a real one. By the way, anyone have an opinion of analyzers in terms of usb vs standalone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers, will build one this weekend. Should last me until I can scrounge the cash for a real one. By the way, anyone have an opinion of analyzers in terms of usb vs standalone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PixelTricks</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31489</link>
		<dc:creator>PixelTricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31489</guid>
		<description>This works really well.&lt;br&gt;I used it last year to view signals from an IR receiver to read the commands that a tv remote control sends out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works really well.<br />I used it last year to view signals from an IR receiver to read the commands that a tv remote control sends out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abend</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31488</link>
		<dc:creator>abend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31488</guid>
		<description>I used the Fabulous Logic Analyzer for Linux. It uses pretty much the same hardware. This software and hardware combination were in the kits I gave away at Chaos Communication Camp. The software and schematics are available here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tfla-01.berlios.de/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tfla-01.berlios.de/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the Fabulous Logic Analyzer for Linux. It uses pretty much the same hardware. This software and hardware combination were in the kits I gave away at Chaos Communication Camp. The software and schematics are available here: <a href="http://tfla-01.berlios.de/" rel="nofollow">http://tfla-01.berlios.de/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giskard</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31487</link>
		<dc:creator>giskard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31487</guid>
		<description>This could probably be improved with the addition of an external power source and some high speed opto-couplers,to protect the computer properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could probably be improved with the addition of an external power source and some high speed opto-couplers,to protect the computer properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8Way</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31486</link>
		<dc:creator>8Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31486</guid>
		<description>ACK!  wrong post.   i meant it for the pic rgb color changer.  Doh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACK!  wrong post.   i meant it for the pic rgb color changer.  Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8Way</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31485</link>
		<dc:creator>8Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31485</guid>
		<description>comment i left on the diylife board:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice design. I wonder if you get subtle flickers when updating the PWM values. I&#039;ve found in my designs on the 14bit pics, that I have to update the PWM when my &quot; 1 byte cycle counter&quot; wraps to zero rather than immediately. You are clocking at a higher clock rate (I use 4-8mhz internal clocks with up to 10 PWM channels), so your design may not be so sensitive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recently, i&#039;ve given up on the PIC and it&#039;s goofy architecture and moved to the Cypress PSOC parts. They are really neat with dedicated digital and analog blocks. You can set up up to 16 PWM (actually I use pseudo random bit sequences, which have less flicker) outputs, and the C compiler is really reliable vs the buggy stuff i&#039;ve experienced w/ the pic (though the PSOC compiler generates crap code). The PSOC has it&#039;s own shortcomings, such as a really inefficient CPU, but the digital and analog blocks more than make up for it b/c stuff is done in HW vs SW. PSOC is really fun, esp when u wrap your head around it&#039;s way of doing things.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comment i left on the diylife board:</p>
<p>Nice design. I wonder if you get subtle flickers when updating the PWM values. I&#8217;ve found in my designs on the 14bit pics, that I have to update the PWM when my &#8221; 1 byte cycle counter&#8221; wraps to zero rather than immediately. You are clocking at a higher clock rate (I use 4-8mhz internal clocks with up to 10 PWM channels), so your design may not be so sensitive.</p>
<p>Recently, i&#8217;ve given up on the PIC and it&#8217;s goofy architecture and moved to the Cypress PSOC parts. They are really neat with dedicated digital and analog blocks. You can set up up to 16 PWM (actually I use pseudo random bit sequences, which have less flicker) outputs, and the C compiler is really reliable vs the buggy stuff i&#8217;ve experienced w/ the pic (though the PSOC compiler generates crap code). The PSOC has it&#8217;s own shortcomings, such as a really inefficient CPU, but the digital and analog blocks more than make up for it b/c stuff is done in HW vs SW. PSOC is really fun, esp when u wrap your head around it&#8217;s way of doing things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickjohnson</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31484</link>
		<dc:creator>nickjohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31484</guid>
		<description>I built one of these a few years ago, including linux software: &lt;a href=&quot;http://uvasux.googlepages.com/simplelogicanalyser&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://uvasux.googlepages.com/simplelogicanalyser&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I built one of these a few years ago, including linux software: <a href="http://uvasux.googlepages.com/simplelogicanalyser" rel="nofollow">http://uvasux.googlepages.com/simplelogicanalyser</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emperor</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31483</link>
		<dc:creator>Emperor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31483</guid>
		<description>build one of these for your printer: &lt;br&gt;the hex file works with the 88, 48 and 168 i think. and besides, its well documented&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/USB2LPT/ul-15.htm.en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/USB2LPT/ul-15.htm.en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then you will have a spare lpt port.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>build one of these for your printer: <br />the hex file works with the 88, 48 and 168 i think. and besides, its well documented</p>
<p><a href="http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/USB2LPT/ul-15.htm.en" rel="nofollow">http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/bastelecke/Rund%20um%20den%20PC/USB2LPT/ul-15.htm.en</a></p>
<p>then you will have a spare lpt port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atrain</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/comment-page-1/#comment-31482</link>
		<dc:creator>atrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/01/28/parallel-port-logic-analyzer/#comment-31482</guid>
		<description>In other words, this just connects stuff directly to your parallel port. Should be very easy to make a Linux driver for this. Too bad my printer is parallel... time to upgrade :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it would be nice to add some kind of playback support. Since those pins on the parallel port are bidirectional, it should be simple enough. Time to pull out my soldering iron!&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, this just connects stuff directly to your parallel port. Should be very easy to make a Linux driver for this. Too bad my printer is parallel&#8230; time to upgrade :D</p>
<p>I think it would be nice to add some kind of playback support. Since those pins on the parallel port are bidirectional, it should be simple enough. Time to pull out my soldering iron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
