Comments on: ShmooCon 2008: Intercepting GSM Traffic

By: katharsis

katharsis — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:25:17 +0000

Bonjour J’ai trouvé un site qui propose un logiciel espion pour controler le portable de n’importe qui via bluetooth voila pour le site :http://i-brid.perso.neuf.fr/
En ésperant que cela aideras des personnes tout comme moi !

i find something to hack all tye of mobile with bluetooh and more easy tu use then ” superbluetooth ”
if you want the website : http://i-brid.perso.neuf.fr/

good bye ! =)

By: Gostixel

Gostixel — Sat, 16 May 2009 09:50:15 +0000

Вот так,несогласен с предыдущими высказываниями
) :-)

By: Babylya

Babylya — Thu, 14 May 2009 05:58:56 +0000

Да,согласен с предыдущими ораторами
Споки Bye

By: jess

jess — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:02:59 +0000

You could just use nvidia graphics cards to do the work with CUDA. A 8800gts can do up to 320GFlops per card. And CUDA is really easy to learn. You can build a 1.2TFlop supercomputer just under $1000. Should help the project progress faster. But really great work.

By: traffic

traffic — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:44:47 +0000

Awesome work! Cheers ;)

By: Jaakko Fagerlund

Jaakko Fagerlund — Thu, 08 May 2008 01:54:58 +0000

If you really want to secure your communications, use Cryptophones (use the Google, Luke).

By: T.L.

T.L. — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:02:24 +0000

I can't believe people are suggesting that someone/group are helping our government/agencies hack gsm calls by hacking it and posting it. That is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. People, they already have gsm stations that record and analyze gsm calls and no cracking is really involved (I mean no crack time involved I should say), where it is as simple as scanning and listening. Here take a look at this: http://www.global-security-solutions.com/ProA-GSMInterceptandTracking.htm and this is public information what about the things we dont know about? No some hacker figuring out gsm theirselves and posting it wont help the government/agencies they've had it since gsm first came out, through backdoor agreements all telecommunication companies have to abide by (or most of them anyway). Regards,
T.L.

By: Will Spencer

Will Spencer — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:49:44 +0000

33wacki:

This is just A5/1.

By: Johnny B. Goode

Johnny B. Goode — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:34:08 +0000

2 Tb?!?! I wonder how long it’s going to take to torrent that. The other thing I wonder is weather or not anybody is hosting videos from shmoo, or has torrents to download them. There’s a couple of the talks I’d really like to watch.

By: Warchief

Warchief — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:26:13 +0000

Is there anyone who working on assembling the sniffed traffic stream by nokia phones?
The thc guys didn’t do any progress about this just copy pasted some xml output from gnokii or whatever tool to the wiki, so I doubt they do anything with it. They rather go with other RF boards for sniffing.
We found some old tool, and leaked docs about nokias monitoring mode (which easy to find on the web) but the code is undocumented.

By: Orv

Orv — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:23:35 +0000

Re 4: Chill. If crackers can do this now with off-the-shelf parts, the government has theoretically been able to for years — except they don’t have to. Why would they go to the trouble of decrypting the over-the-air signal when there are already taps in place on the central office lines, where the signal is in the clear? The privacy of any phone call is largely an illusion.

By: mesatchornug

mesatchornug — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:57:20 +0000

@ Mollshoebbel:
it seems you’re missing the point here – they crack this system to force a newer, better system. because if you or i could do it with off the shelf components and a little ingenuity and time, others can too.

By: Mollshoebbel

Mollshoebbel — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:11:30 +0000

Yeah! Relly great!
Not just that government officials want to peer into gsm encryption. Maybe now we’re even helping them doing it.
Why do we demolish the technology that should keep our privacy safe???

Thanks a lot! Morons!

By: 33Wacki

33Wacki — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:05:47 +0000

A5/0 , A5/1 , A5/2, or A5/3. Which one is it?, cause I doubt it is A5/2. It’s prolly the least secure A5/0, the orginal GSM encryption.

By: Pfiffer

Pfiffer — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:53:22 +0000

I think this is really amazing.