<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HackIt: Better project documentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: follower</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31893</link>
		<dc:creator>follower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31893</guid>
		<description>A related thought: documenting a project well is a *lot* of hard work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Each level of media you add (e.g. text, diagrams, photographs, video) increases dramatically the amount of time it takes to document.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ideally, find some way to encourage yourself to document as you go, I&#039;ve found having a &quot;personal wiki&quot;/online lab/project notebook has helped.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any documentation is better than none.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This also means it&#039;s important to appreciate when someone has taken the time to document their project.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A related thought: documenting a project well is a *lot* of hard work.</p>
<p>Each level of media you add (e.g. text, diagrams, photographs, video) increases dramatically the amount of time it takes to document.</p>
<p>Ideally, find some way to encourage yourself to document as you go, I&#8217;ve found having a &#8220;personal wiki&#8221;/online lab/project notebook has helped.</p>
<p>Any documentation is better than none.</p>
<p>This also means it&#8217;s important to appreciate when someone has taken the time to document their project.</p>
<p>&#8211;Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliseo</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31892</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31892</guid>
		<description>Informative Article... AWESOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative Article&#8230; AWESOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason gibbens</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31891</link>
		<dc:creator>jason gibbens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31891</guid>
		<description>Inventgeek does a good consistant job at it.&lt;br&gt;I hate instructables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inventgeek does a good consistant job at it.<br />I hate instructables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinerasis</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31890</link>
		<dc:creator>sinerasis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31890</guid>
		<description>Agreed with some of the other replies, pictures are worth a lot, especially when people speak/write different languages. It&#039;s also nice to see standards stuck to when writing up maps and things that use symbols. Like a ground symbol is pretty universal, so might as well use it instead of your own little squiggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with some of the other replies, pictures are worth a lot, especially when people speak/write different languages. It&#8217;s also nice to see standards stuck to when writing up maps and things that use symbols. Like a ground symbol is pretty universal, so might as well use it instead of your own little squiggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDN</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31889</link>
		<dc:creator>JDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31889</guid>
		<description>Major kudos to this site and contributors.  Lots of top notch work and ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d like to see for each project a proper introduction and description of the problem being solved. The intros are sometimes rather vague, and with all the effort in describing the how-tos I can&#039;t always appreciate why someone would even be bothering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get the impression at times that the authors just dive in assuming the readers are of the same community and are familiar with the context. With nearly 25 years in electronics engineering I don&#039;t need anyone to hold my hand; just please take a paragraph or two (links are fine) to provide background and explain why I should care what you&#039;re doing. Hackaday is good for this; the linked sites are sometimes much less so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I&#039;ve learned time and again from my own mistakes, try to anticipate the redundant time consuming stuff for your readers. 5 minutes of my time is NOT worth more than many accumulated hours of my readers&#039; time. Include clear photos and diagrams, simple explanations, complete parts list with suppliers and estimated costs, list of tools, required and suggested utilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As with any prose, try to emulate those authors (and hackers) who make docs that are not just precise and instructive but are fun. And, add links to similar solutions if available, especially if they&#039;re commercial solutions (to rub it in).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major kudos to this site and contributors.  Lots of top notch work and ideas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see for each project a proper introduction and description of the problem being solved. The intros are sometimes rather vague, and with all the effort in describing the how-tos I can&#8217;t always appreciate why someone would even be bothering.</p>
<p>I get the impression at times that the authors just dive in assuming the readers are of the same community and are familiar with the context. With nearly 25 years in electronics engineering I don&#8217;t need anyone to hold my hand; just please take a paragraph or two (links are fine) to provide background and explain why I should care what you&#8217;re doing. Hackaday is good for this; the linked sites are sometimes much less so.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve learned time and again from my own mistakes, try to anticipate the redundant time consuming stuff for your readers. 5 minutes of my time is NOT worth more than many accumulated hours of my readers&#8217; time. Include clear photos and diagrams, simple explanations, complete parts list with suppliers and estimated costs, list of tools, required and suggested utilities.</p>
<p>As with any prose, try to emulate those authors (and hackers) who make docs that are not just precise and instructive but are fun. And, add links to similar solutions if available, especially if they&#8217;re commercial solutions (to rub it in).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoopyMind</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31888</link>
		<dc:creator>LoopyMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31888</guid>
		<description>Pictures taken in close-up using a macro setting... instead of having to squint to try to make out detail :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pictures taken in close-up using a macro setting&#8230; instead of having to squint to try to make out detail :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maneuver</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31887</link>
		<dc:creator>maneuver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31887</guid>
		<description>I like write-ups that include:&lt;br&gt;reasonable pictures.&lt;br&gt;part lists.&lt;br&gt;equipment lists.&lt;br&gt;if parts of your hack has been inspired by others project, please link to these. So I can be equally inspired.&lt;br&gt;If you know/suspect that other parts/solutions might work, please mention it.&lt;br&gt;Mention any snaggs/problems you encounter, so I dont feel like a total moron when I try to copy your hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like write-ups that include:<br />reasonable pictures.<br />part lists.<br />equipment lists.<br />if parts of your hack has been inspired by others project, please link to these. So I can be equally inspired.<br />If you know/suspect that other parts/solutions might work, please mention it.<br />Mention any snaggs/problems you encounter, so I dont feel like a total moron when I try to copy your hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skyler Orlando</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31886</link>
		<dc:creator>Skyler Orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31886</guid>
		<description>Personally, I feel that good grammar and spelling are essential in a good writeup. If I see a project with terrible spelling and grammar, I usually get turned off and just look at the pictures, saying &quot;Hmm, that&#039;s interesting,&quot; and then forget about it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also important are clear diagrams and pictures to make it easier for a non-technical reader to understand. Links to relevant information are also a plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I feel that good grammar and spelling are essential in a good writeup. If I see a project with terrible spelling and grammar, I usually get turned off and just look at the pictures, saying &#8220;Hmm, that&#8217;s interesting,&#8221; and then forget about it. </p>
<p>Also important are clear diagrams and pictures to make it easier for a non-technical reader to understand. Links to relevant information are also a plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satiagraha</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31885</link>
		<dc:creator>Satiagraha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31885</guid>
		<description>I work in an electronics failure analysis lab for NASA, and one of the biggest things about analyzing a failed part is the documentation of it. I cannot stress enough how important it is to records to take pictures of every major condition a part is in. For us, it is not uncommon to take hundreds of different photos of a part, even if we don&#039;t use all of them in our final report. Pictures are useful for the &quot;oh gee, a scratch, was that there before?&quot; as well as the simple explanation of what the part looks like outside and on the inside. Since digital cameras makes imaging so easy, and we have memory cards that hold thousands upon thousands of pictures, there&#039;s no reason not to take a lot of pictures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, it&#039;s also important to fully explain the details of what you&#039;re making. For example, electrical schematics, physical shapes, etc.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in an electronics failure analysis lab for NASA, and one of the biggest things about analyzing a failed part is the documentation of it. I cannot stress enough how important it is to records to take pictures of every major condition a part is in. For us, it is not uncommon to take hundreds of different photos of a part, even if we don&#8217;t use all of them in our final report. Pictures are useful for the &#8220;oh gee, a scratch, was that there before?&#8221; as well as the simple explanation of what the part looks like outside and on the inside. Since digital cameras makes imaging so easy, and we have memory cards that hold thousands upon thousands of pictures, there&#8217;s no reason not to take a lot of pictures.</p>
<p>That being said, it&#8217;s also important to fully explain the details of what you&#8217;re making. For example, electrical schematics, physical shapes, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandark</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31884</link>
		<dc:creator>mandark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31884</guid>
		<description>Pictures are important, but i often miss a well drawn schematic with signals drawn from left to right, separated (grouped) power supply with decoupling capacitors and comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pictures are important, but i often miss a well drawn schematic with signals drawn from left to right, separated (grouped) power supply with decoupling capacitors and comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twistedsymphony</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31883</link>
		<dc:creator>twistedsymphony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31883</guid>
		<description>Most of the important points are already taken but to take it a step further and talk about _WEB_ documentation specifically I think there are two very important aspects to consider&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. keep everything on a single page that can be viewed by a browser and indexed by a search engine. If you MUST break it up across multiple pages then ensure that the title, current step, and keywords associated with the project appear on all pages. It&#039;s also preferable that you host it somewhere it can stay for the forseeable future. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Attention college students: that uni provided hosting wont last past graduation, and neither will your project&#039;s legacy if you don&#039;t host it elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. All files should be in a platform independent format. If you&#039;ve got an Eagle PCB schematic, great, zip that up for people, but also provide them with a .jpg, .gif, or .pdf so they can view it right in their browser. you have source code? great, throw that in a .txt outside of the zip as well so people can view that too. Everyone viewing your documentation via the web will have a web browser, so it&#039;s a good idea to ensure that all of your documentation can be viewed by a web browser... it&#039;s pretty simple really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Google use the alt text in html image  tags to label images for their search, be sure to put the project name and useful information about the project in there if you want those pictures to get indexed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. If you took some pics with your digital camera at it&#039;s full resolution and left them that size and with the generic naming... that can be great for detail but do us all a favor and instead of hyper linking to 100+ generically named images, size them down physically and dimensionally and display them on the page with links to the full size photo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;5. Not realy web specific, but good and more specifically consistant formatting is important. Some rules to follow for formatting&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a. tell them what you&#039;re going to tell them, tell them, and then tell them what you told them. title the project appropriately like &quot;how to build a dohicky&quot; or &quot;modify your widget for bluetooth&quot;, provide a brief description about the goals of the project, what topics the project will cover and what it wont cover. Tell them the kind of tools, materials, and prior knowledge they&#039;ll need to accomplish the task (if a tutorial), then go through all the steps, then wrap it up by explaining what it all means and what the results should be like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;b.keep the steps or sections to a manageable size, have the breakup of steps make sense, and keep them small enough that someone could read a section and retain all of it for 5-10 minutes while they try to do it without having to keep going back to the step. Don&#039;t make them so small however that you insult the intelligence if your reader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c.use strong visual cues to break up the steps, with a consistent numbering and formatting scheme throughout. If someone needs to glance back at the page to read something they don&#039;t want to have to scan through buckets of text to find their place again (this comment is exempt because I don&#039;t have control over the formatting :p ).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;d.understand the knowledge level of your reader and write to that, don&#039;t over explain the basics if you&#039;re writing about an expert topic, and don&#039;t make ANY assumptions about what a beginner should already know. Also use appropriate vocabulary for the intended audience and never use slang, an acronym, or an abbreviation without explaining it at least once in the documentation (preferable the first time you mention the term).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thats all I can think of for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the important points are already taken but to take it a step further and talk about _WEB_ documentation specifically I think there are two very important aspects to consider</p>
<p>1. keep everything on a single page that can be viewed by a browser and indexed by a search engine. If you MUST break it up across multiple pages then ensure that the title, current step, and keywords associated with the project appear on all pages. It&#8217;s also preferable that you host it somewhere it can stay for the forseeable future. </p>
<p>Attention college students: that uni provided hosting wont last past graduation, and neither will your project&#8217;s legacy if you don&#8217;t host it elsewhere.</p>
<p>3. All files should be in a platform independent format. If you&#8217;ve got an Eagle PCB schematic, great, zip that up for people, but also provide them with a .jpg, .gif, or .pdf so they can view it right in their browser. you have source code? great, throw that in a .txt outside of the zip as well so people can view that too. Everyone viewing your documentation via the web will have a web browser, so it&#8217;s a good idea to ensure that all of your documentation can be viewed by a web browser&#8230; it&#8217;s pretty simple really.</p>
<p>3. Google use the alt text in html image  tags to label images for their search, be sure to put the project name and useful information about the project in there if you want those pictures to get indexed.</p>
<p>4. If you took some pics with your digital camera at it&#8217;s full resolution and left them that size and with the generic naming&#8230; that can be great for detail but do us all a favor and instead of hyper linking to 100+ generically named images, size them down physically and dimensionally and display them on the page with links to the full size photo. </p>
<p>5. Not realy web specific, but good and more specifically consistant formatting is important. Some rules to follow for formatting</p>
<p>a. tell them what you&#8217;re going to tell them, tell them, and then tell them what you told them. title the project appropriately like &#8220;how to build a dohicky&#8221; or &#8220;modify your widget for bluetooth&#8221;, provide a brief description about the goals of the project, what topics the project will cover and what it wont cover. Tell them the kind of tools, materials, and prior knowledge they&#8217;ll need to accomplish the task (if a tutorial), then go through all the steps, then wrap it up by explaining what it all means and what the results should be like.</p>
<p>b.keep the steps or sections to a manageable size, have the breakup of steps make sense, and keep them small enough that someone could read a section and retain all of it for 5-10 minutes while they try to do it without having to keep going back to the step. Don&#8217;t make them so small however that you insult the intelligence if your reader.</p>
<p>c.use strong visual cues to break up the steps, with a consistent numbering and formatting scheme throughout. If someone needs to glance back at the page to read something they don&#8217;t want to have to scan through buckets of text to find their place again (this comment is exempt because I don&#8217;t have control over the formatting :p ).</p>
<p>d.understand the knowledge level of your reader and write to that, don&#8217;t over explain the basics if you&#8217;re writing about an expert topic, and don&#8217;t make ANY assumptions about what a beginner should already know. Also use appropriate vocabulary for the intended audience and never use slang, an acronym, or an abbreviation without explaining it at least once in the documentation (preferable the first time you mention the term).</p>
<p>Thats all I can think of for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Witt</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31882</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Witt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m of the opinion that a how-to is nothing without good pictures. Get a nice diffuser and a professional flash setup, not to mention a nice 60mm macro lens. That&#039;ll set you back a lot of money, but your pictures will look nice, and that means that it&#039;s easier to follow instructions, not to mention that its more likely to draw in more people to the project (pretty pictures sell ideas well). As long as you can write, I think that&#039;s all you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that a how-to is nothing without good pictures. Get a nice diffuser and a professional flash setup, not to mention a nice 60mm macro lens. That&#8217;ll set you back a lot of money, but your pictures will look nice, and that means that it&#8217;s easier to follow instructions, not to mention that its more likely to draw in more people to the project (pretty pictures sell ideas well). As long as you can write, I think that&#8217;s all you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumguy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31881</link>
		<dc:creator>sumguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31881</guid>
		<description>I am all for full disclosure, sourcecode, schematics, everything; but it&#039;s really annoying when you have to download a zip file with all the files just to see one, and even more so if it&#039;s something like a gerber file. I shouldn&#039;t have to install a new program just to get an idea how the thing works. Reading documentation and reproducing a project are 2 different activities and the content makers need to keep that in mind when writing. All the documentation should be web accesible with out extra software or downloads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for full disclosure, sourcecode, schematics, everything; but it&#8217;s really annoying when you have to download a zip file with all the files just to see one, and even more so if it&#8217;s something like a gerber file. I shouldn&#8217;t have to install a new program just to get an idea how the thing works. Reading documentation and reproducing a project are 2 different activities and the content makers need to keep that in mind when writing. All the documentation should be web accesible with out extra software or downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldscott</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31880</link>
		<dc:creator>goldscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31880</guid>
		<description>Well commented code!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, discussing the mistakes you made and how you went about fixing them, as well as alternative solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well commented code!</p>
<p>Also, discussing the mistakes you made and how you went about fixing them, as well as alternative solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epicelite</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-31879</link>
		<dc:creator>epicelite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/02/22/hackit-better-project-documentation/#comment-31879</guid>
		<description>Where you got all of the parts for said project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where you got all of the parts for said project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
