Comments on: Cornell ECE Final projects: Spring 08 http://hackaday.com/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/ Fresh hacks every day Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:41:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: mike http://hackaday.com/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/comment-page-1/#comment-55433 Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:09:09 +0000 http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/#comment-55433 boring

]]> By: jproach http://hackaday.com/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33376 Wed, 07 May 2008 04:31:06 +0000 http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/#comment-33376 Most of the projects used the m32, so I’m sure they just worked with what was available and they were familiar with. Even if it wasn’t ideal.

Although CAN AVRs also exist (at90can, atmega32C1, etc.), which would be an easy transition.

]]> By: jelengar http://hackaday.com/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33375 Tue, 06 May 2008 13:52:55 +0000 http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/#comment-33375 nice project, but why complicate things so much? why not just use an arm running on higher frequency? 500hz it’s not too difficult to achieve with uC running at 70mhz + it’s probably cheaper… interesting implementation of can though…

]]> By: Jerome http://hackaday.com/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/comment-page-1/#comment-33374 Tue, 06 May 2008 09:54:11 +0000 http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/05/cornell-ece-final-projects-spring-08/#comment-33374 why not using PIC µC including a CAN interface ? they are cheap, fast and not limitated by the SPI link
nice project :-)

]]>