<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porting CHDK to new cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: schjlatah</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-42665</link>
		<dc:creator>schjlatah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-42665</guid>
		<description>@andrenceo: I have a canon SD30 that I would love to get time lapse working on (actually the reason I bought it was because it&#039;s a canon and thusly hackable). Do you have any info/links to facilitate writing a ubasic script or installing it on the cam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@andrenceo: I have a canon SD30 that I would love to get time lapse working on (actually the reason I bought it was because it&#8217;s a canon and thusly hackable). Do you have any info/links to facilitate writing a ubasic script or installing it on the cam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strider_mt2k</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35869</link>
		<dc:creator>strider_mt2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35869</guid>
		<description>@#3: elegant is exactly the word that struck me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beautiful work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#3: elegant is exactly the word that struck me.</p>
<p>Beautiful work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xhantt</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35868</link>
		<dc:creator>xhantt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35868</guid>
		<description>@andreneo: If you want time lapse you can code your own ubasic script it has a sleep sentence. Also there&#039;re builds that have motion detection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@andreneo: If you want time lapse you can code your own ubasic script it has a sleep sentence. Also there&#8217;re builds that have motion detection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lenger</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35867</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35867</guid>
		<description>sorry the flickr url was stripped from my last post: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/?s=rank#models&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/?s=rank#models&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry the flickr url was stripped from my last post: <br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/?s=rank#models" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/?s=rank#models</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lenger</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35866</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35866</guid>
		<description>AndrewNeo: The SD800 and SD870 would be my first choice as they support wide angle (28mm equiv.) They are not the cheapest, but are the best in my mind. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flickr has a nice chart showing which models are most popular. &quot;IS&quot; means it has image stabilizer which is handy for preventing blurry shots in lower light. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want super cheap try the 570, though I think you&#039;ll find having 28mm is worth the extra $.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AndrewNeo: The SD800 and SD870 would be my first choice as they support wide angle (28mm equiv.) They are not the cheapest, but are the best in my mind. </p>
<p>Flickr has a nice chart showing which models are most popular. &#8220;IS&#8221; means it has image stabilizer which is handy for preventing blurry shots in lower light. </p>
<p>If you want super cheap try the 570, though I think you&#8217;ll find having 28mm is worth the extra $.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr.t</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35865</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35865</guid>
		<description>Would be great if it was ported to the Cannon S80</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be great if it was ported to the Cannon S80</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjolson140</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35864</link>
		<dc:creator>cjolson140</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35864</guid>
		<description>the led flashing firmware dump is one of the more elegant hacks i&#039;ve seen in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the led flashing firmware dump is one of the more elegant hacks i&#8217;ve seen in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewNeo</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35863</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewNeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35863</guid>
		<description>Reading the earlier post on CHDK made me rather interested in this, but it&#039;s pretty awesome they managed to get the firmware extracted through the LED.&lt;br&gt;Now, if only their site listed which cameras where cheapest/most decent..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the earlier post on CHDK made me rather interested in this, but it&#8217;s pretty awesome they managed to get the firmware extracted through the LED.<br />Now, if only their site listed which cameras where cheapest/most decent..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Alexander</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-35862</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/05/27/porting-chdk-to-new-cameras/#comment-35862</guid>
		<description>Canon 40D? The firmware images are freely downloadable online (assuming it&#039;s the right format). I&#039;d love to be able to do time lapse without hooking it up to a PC (or maybe it does this? heh, i haven&#039;t actually looked).&lt;br&gt;-Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 40D? The firmware images are freely downloadable online (assuming it&#8217;s the right format). I&#8217;d love to be able to do time lapse without hooking it up to a PC (or maybe it does this? heh, i haven&#8217;t actually looked).<br />-Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
