<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New vs. old iPhone Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bell %9</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-80374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bell %9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-80374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write in my site something like that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write in my site something like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree.&lt;br&gt;No more crap. Just one hack per day. Got two good ones? Keep one for the day after.&lt;br&gt;Only exceptions should be articles about hack related events, which could be posted on the same day as a hack.&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.<br />No more crap. Just one hack per day. Got two good ones? Keep one for the day after.<br />Only exceptions should be articles about hack related events, which could be posted on the same day as a hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This garbage has nothing to do with hacks at all!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe if it told us HOW to hack the phone... BUT it does not!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wtf man... ruining a good site with this horse junk.&lt;br&gt;*confused*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This garbage has nothing to do with hacks at all!</p>
<p>Maybe if it told us HOW to hack the phone&#8230; BUT it does not!</p>
<p>Wtf man&#8230; ruining a good site with this horse junk.<br />*confused*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmang</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, ty sean for the daily link. just made that the default for my hackaday link in my toolbar. wish there was a way i could have the rest of the hacks (misc/gps/peripherals/etc) and none of the news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;screw these &quot;news&quot; type of posts, will was doing fine with doing a hack a day (hmmm what a concept). fire the new staff, you dont need them...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, ty sean for the daily link. just made that the default for my hackaday link in my toolbar. wish there was a way i could have the rest of the hacks (misc/gps/peripherals/etc) and none of the news.</p>
<p>screw these &#8220;news&#8221; type of posts, will was doing fine with doing a hack a day (hmmm what a concept). fire the new staff, you dont need them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F00 f00</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F00 f00]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@sean, nice work.It seems that link just shows will&#039;s posts, perfect. Should be added as a direct crap filter on the front page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sean, nice work.It seems that link just shows will&#8217;s posts, perfect. Should be added as a direct crap filter on the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, first poster again.&lt;br&gt;For all of you who share the view that there is a lot of garbage, use this link instead while viewing hackaday if the rubbish really gets to you:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hackaday.com/category/daily/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hackaday.com/category/daily/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It still has the 1 hack a day with the taped up picture, and filters out the other newsy things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, first poster again.<br />For all of you who share the view that there is a lot of garbage, use this link instead while viewing hackaday if the rubbish really gets to you:<br /><a href="http://www.hackaday.com/category/daily/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hackaday.com/category/daily/</a><br />It still has the 1 hack a day with the taped up picture, and filters out the other newsy things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadManMike</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadManMike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed with #1 &lt;br&gt;the name of the website is &quot;HACK a day&quot;  not &quot;Iphone advertisement a day&quot;   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep to a single... well thought out hack.. per day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;just my .02&lt;br&gt;-MadMan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with #1 <br />the name of the website is &#8220;HACK a day&#8221;  not &#8220;Iphone advertisement a day&#8221;   </p>
<p>Keep to a single&#8230; well thought out hack.. per day.</p>
<p>just my .02<br />-MadMan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkFader</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DarkFader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old! The iPhone 3G already has been hacked!&lt;br&gt;Oh it wasn&#039;t a hack post. My mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old! The iPhone 3G already has been hacked!<br />Oh it wasn&#8217;t a hack post. My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbr</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apart from being irrelevant, the information in this post is plain wrong. First of all, there are way more games for jailbroken iPhones/iPots than that old NES emu. That was news one year ago, guys. Since then we&#039;ve seen Gameboy Advance, Playstation, and SNES emulators. Not to mention complex, 3d, native games like Raging Thunder (a 3d racing game).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what&#039;s with this six-hacks-a-day thing? What happened to ONE a day? I&#039;m starting to long for the days when Will was the only posting editor. Look for a little more quality over quantity in your posts, guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from being irrelevant, the information in this post is plain wrong. First of all, there are way more games for jailbroken iPhones/iPots than that old NES emu. That was news one year ago, guys. Since then we&#8217;ve seen Gameboy Advance, Playstation, and SNES emulators. Not to mention complex, 3d, native games like Raging Thunder (a 3d racing game).</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s with this six-hacks-a-day thing? What happened to ONE a day? I&#8217;m starting to long for the days when Will was the only posting editor. Look for a little more quality over quantity in your posts, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F00 f00</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F00 f00]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hack= False&lt;br&gt;A_Day= False&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, no more of this rubbish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hack= False<br />A_Day= False</p>
<p>Seriously, no more of this rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disapointed User</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Disapointed User]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree, the maintainers of this site are totally abusing the powers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is Hackaday, we came here for what you originally gave us.. not this dumb-downed news crap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we wanted this, we would have went to a news portal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As been told in several other posts, clean up your act guys.. stop ignoring your loyal viewers, it&#039;s not wise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree, the maintainers of this site are totally abusing the powers.</p>
<p>This is Hackaday, we came here for what you originally gave us.. not this dumb-downed news crap.</p>
<p>If we wanted this, we would have went to a news portal.</p>
<p>As been told in several other posts, clean up your act guys.. stop ignoring your loyal viewers, it&#8217;s not wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Meyer</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collin Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with post 1 also.  I may be somewhat biased toward Jailbreaking considering my involvment in hardware hacks for Iphone, but that&#039;s also why I come to this site :)   Hack-a-day it is, right?  Not Engadget ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with post 1 also.  I may be somewhat biased toward Jailbreaking considering my involvment in hardware hacks for Iphone, but that&#8217;s also why I come to this site :)   Hack-a-day it is, right?  Not Engadget ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ret</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the iphone sucks, and apple sucks. i have a friend whose ipod keeps freezing. i jokingly tell him: it&#039;s because apple&#039;s hq is on 1 infinite loop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the iphone sucks, and apple sucks. i have a friend whose ipod keeps freezing. i jokingly tell him: it&#8217;s because apple&#8217;s hq is on 1 infinite loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the first post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I have been lurking this site for a number of years, and this is the first time that I have been disappointed in the content presented to me on this site. &lt;br&gt;    &lt;br&gt;    I know that some naysayers will tell me that, &quot;you don&#039;t have to read articles of this type if you don&#039;t want to, and nobody is forcing you to read them.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I will respond preemptively by stating that when any media group or blog, etc changes to a more popular article type or tv show type, etc, viewers may go up, but the original, founding group feels betrayed and abandoned. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    A recent example of this would be when the Discovery channel began to broadcast shows such as &quot;Cash Cab&quot; and &quot;The Deadliest Catch&quot;. The shows, though interesting to some, were more reminiscent of mainstream reality tv shows of little educational merit. This directly contradicted the name of &quot;Discovery&quot; which may lead a viewer to believe that they broadcast an educational palette of shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    I am also reminded of TLC, who in recent years has gone from &quot;The Learning Channel&quot; to the &quot;Testosterone Lowering Channel.&quot; TLC&#039;s downfall all &lt;br&gt;began with a show that I rather liked: Junkyard Wars. It was a good show, a show that I feel many here would have enjoyed, but it deviated from the standard TLC fare. Thus, it opened the way for the crap which now perpetually graces the screen of TLC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  I hope that hackaday will stay away from future articles of this sort, and instead stay true to its roots. I love this site, and I dread the day when it goes the way of TLC. Please editors, beware of this type of article in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the first post.</p>
<p>    I have been lurking this site for a number of years, and this is the first time that I have been disappointed in the content presented to me on this site. </p>
<p>    I know that some naysayers will tell me that, &#8220;you don&#8217;t have to read articles of this type if you don&#8217;t want to, and nobody is forcing you to read them.&#8221; </p>
<p>    I will respond preemptively by stating that when any media group or blog, etc changes to a more popular article type or tv show type, etc, viewers may go up, but the original, founding group feels betrayed and abandoned. </p>
<p>    A recent example of this would be when the Discovery channel began to broadcast shows such as &#8220;Cash Cab&#8221; and &#8220;The Deadliest Catch&#8221;. The shows, though interesting to some, were more reminiscent of mainstream reality tv shows of little educational merit. This directly contradicted the name of &#8220;Discovery&#8221; which may lead a viewer to believe that they broadcast an educational palette of shows.</p>
<p>    I am also reminded of TLC, who in recent years has gone from &#8220;The Learning Channel&#8221; to the &#8220;Testosterone Lowering Channel.&#8221; TLC&#8217;s downfall all <br />began with a show that I rather liked: Junkyard Wars. It was a good show, a show that I feel many here would have enjoyed, but it deviated from the standard TLC fare. Thus, it opened the way for the crap which now perpetually graces the screen of TLC.</p>
<p>  I hope that hackaday will stay away from future articles of this sort, and instead stay true to its roots. I love this site, and I dread the day when it goes the way of TLC. Please editors, beware of this type of article in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-36630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/10/new-vs-old-iphone-apps/#comment-36630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a hack. This is not the kind of content I come to this site for... there are plenty of news-type blogs out there already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a hack. This is not the kind of content I come to this site for&#8230; there are plenty of news-type blogs out there already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

