<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HMD try out for Gizmodo commenters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vrekks</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-77360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vrekks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/#comment-77360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in response to the post about the kopin bdm 230k, i am interested in those displays.  shoot me an email if you are still monitoring this board(its my name at gmail).  thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in response to the post about the kopin bdm 230k, i am interested in those displays.  shoot me an email if you are still monitoring this board(its my name at gmail).  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnt</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-37444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tnt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/#comment-37444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a bunch of kopin brand bdm-230k modules coming in for the tracking-display testing I will be doing. They aren&#039;t the best res (320 x 240 per eye) but are great to experiment with and you can see if you want to buy something better down the road. They are like the ones in the spy car kit but are color and include two displays. If you have any interest in them I will be getting rid of them for cheap pretty soon. Just comment below if you have an interest in fiddling with these type of things. Here is the product&#039;s page... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kopin.com/bdm-230k/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.kopin.com/bdm-230k/&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bunch of kopin brand bdm-230k modules coming in for the tracking-display testing I will be doing. They aren&#8217;t the best res (320 x 240 per eye) but are great to experiment with and you can see if you want to buy something better down the road. They are like the ones in the spy car kit but are color and include two displays. If you have any interest in them I will be getting rid of them for cheap pretty soon. Just comment below if you have an interest in fiddling with these type of things. Here is the product&#8217;s page&#8230; <a href="http://www.kopin.com/bdm-230k/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kopin.com/bdm-230k/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miked</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-37443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/#comment-37443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i do not approve of this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it is a commercial for gizmodo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not approve of this post.</p>
<p>it is a commercial for gizmodo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haku</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/comment-page-1/#comment-37442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haku]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/21/hmd-try-out-for-gizmodo-commenters/#comment-37442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have owned/used 6 different pairs of LCD glasses and one thing that is missing from almost ALL reviews of any LCD glasses is how good the optics are combined with the viewing angle of the tiny LCD screen - something extremely important when considering buying some, because poor viewing angle coupled with poor optics means diagonal corners of the display are darker and you try to move them to get an even brightness but you never can, so they become a disappointment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still have 3 different LCD glasses;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* iTheater - 320x240, lightweight bright, long battery life, not very good optics (dark diagonal corners syndrome), the +v line in the wire broke and haven&#039;t bothered to try and repair it yet&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* i-visor DH-4400VPD - old, 800x600 resolution, can do full 3D by interlacing or through dual VGA or composite video inputs, ok optics but the LCD screens are B/W and colour is achieved through a flashing RGB LED behind the screens meaning they flicker, not very comfortable to wear&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Sony Glasstron PLM-S700E - despite being many years old these LCD glasses are simply superb, Sony went to town when they created these, comfortable to wear, excellent optics onto a 832x624 resolution (native unscaled 800x600 PC input or 1024x768 that scales down to 832x624), the only drawback I found with them is the lead between glasses+controller is too short and the controller is noisy because of the fan inside (it consumes about as much power as a PS2). They&#039;re amazing for playing driving games on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have also owned some Olympus FMD-200 glasses and whilst they&#039;re old and low resolution and the image isn&#039;t 100% scaled properly, they&#039;re very comfortable and the optics are superb (one day I&#039;ll get another pair), as well as some Rimax Virtual Vision 4.0 glasses that despite 640x480 resolution they were uncomfortable to wear and had atrocious optics, uneven brightness resulting in the diagonal corners of the image being dark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned/used 6 different pairs of LCD glasses and one thing that is missing from almost ALL reviews of any LCD glasses is how good the optics are combined with the viewing angle of the tiny LCD screen &#8211; something extremely important when considering buying some, because poor viewing angle coupled with poor optics means diagonal corners of the display are darker and you try to move them to get an even brightness but you never can, so they become a disappointment.</p>
<p>I still have 3 different LCD glasses;</p>
<p>* iTheater &#8211; 320&#215;240, lightweight bright, long battery life, not very good optics (dark diagonal corners syndrome), the +v line in the wire broke and haven&#8217;t bothered to try and repair it yet</p>
<p>* i-visor DH-4400VPD &#8211; old, 800&#215;600 resolution, can do full 3D by interlacing or through dual VGA or composite video inputs, ok optics but the LCD screens are B/W and colour is achieved through a flashing RGB LED behind the screens meaning they flicker, not very comfortable to wear</p>
<p>* Sony Glasstron PLM-S700E &#8211; despite being many years old these LCD glasses are simply superb, Sony went to town when they created these, comfortable to wear, excellent optics onto a 832&#215;624 resolution (native unscaled 800&#215;600 PC input or 1024&#215;768 that scales down to 832&#215;624), the only drawback I found with them is the lead between glasses+controller is too short and the controller is noisy because of the fan inside (it consumes about as much power as a PS2). They&#8217;re amazing for playing driving games on.</p>
<p>I have also owned some Olympus FMD-200 glasses and whilst they&#8217;re old and low resolution and the image isn&#8217;t 100% scaled properly, they&#8217;re very comfortable and the optics are superb (one day I&#8217;ll get another pair), as well as some Rimax Virtual Vision 4.0 glasses that despite 640&#215;480 resolution they were uncomfortable to wear and had atrocious optics, uneven brightness resulting in the diagonal corners of the image being dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

