<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charter abandons packet monitoring advertising plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricky C</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-37722</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/#comment-37722</guid>
		<description>I heard about this recently in the podcast &quot;Security Now!&quot; and thought it is absolutely ridiculous.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides the security implications, wouldn&#039;t this slow the network down a considerable amount? Maybe the official wording would be something like &quot;a fraction of a second&quot; but that&#039;s a long time when it comes to network traffic... I can&#039;t imagine using a network with one of these monitoring tools for something like online gaming, the delay would have to be by several hundred milliseconds for all the sniffing, wouldn&#039;t you think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I&#039;m on Road Runner cable and hopefully they&#039;ll be smart. I&#039;ve liked them in the past because they are one of few providers that let you host on port 80; perhaps they&#039;ll continue being nonrestrictive and noninvasive by not installing one of these spy boxes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about this recently in the podcast &#8220;Security Now!&#8221; and thought it is absolutely ridiculous.</p>
<p>Besides the security implications, wouldn&#8217;t this slow the network down a considerable amount? Maybe the official wording would be something like &#8220;a fraction of a second&#8221; but that&#8217;s a long time when it comes to network traffic&#8230; I can&#8217;t imagine using a network with one of these monitoring tools for something like online gaming, the delay would have to be by several hundred milliseconds for all the sniffing, wouldn&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m on Road Runner cable and hopefully they&#8217;ll be smart. I&#8217;ve liked them in the past because they are one of few providers that let you host on port 80; perhaps they&#8217;ll continue being nonrestrictive and noninvasive by not installing one of these spy boxes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalcProgrammer1</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-37721</link>
		<dc:creator>CalcProgrammer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/#comment-37721</guid>
		<description>YAY!  My ISP did something right!  Thank you Charter!  At least Charter listened to it&#039;s users and realized that we did not want our packets monitored by them.  Hopefully other ISP&#039;s will follow and not invade users&#039; privacy by inspecting packets and selling information to advertising companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY!  My ISP did something right!  Thank you Charter!  At least Charter listened to it&#8217;s users and realized that we did not want our packets monitored by them.  Hopefully other ISP&#8217;s will follow and not invade users&#8217; privacy by inspecting packets and selling information to advertising companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannes</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-37720</link>
		<dc:creator>hannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/charter-abandons-packet-monitoring-advertising-plan/#comment-37720</guid>
		<description>as miked will say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as miked will say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
