<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nano GPS logger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gps tracker system</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-104263</link>
		<dc:creator>gps tracker system</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-104263</guid>
		<description>Super-Duper site! I love it!! I believe I&#039;m right to say GPS is more accurate than GSM tracking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super-Duper site! I love it!! I believe I&#8217;m right to say GPS is more accurate than GSM tracking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electronic guru</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-99020</link>
		<dc:creator>electronic guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-99020</guid>
		<description>Maybe a Trackstick would do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a Trackstick would do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hansi</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-98049</link>
		<dc:creator>Hansi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-98049</guid>
		<description>Here are 10Hz mini GPS modules available: http://www.perthold.de/index_p_en.htm (bottom of page). I got the module for 25 USD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are 10Hz mini GPS modules available: <a href="http://www.perthold.de/index_p_en.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.perthold.de/index_p_en.htm</a> (bottom of page). I got the module for 25 USD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alliegirl</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-58391</link>
		<dc:creator>alliegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-58391</guid>
		<description>can this be used to track a subject by mounting under a car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can this be used to track a subject by mounting under a car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37713</link>
		<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37713</guid>
		<description>@adam&lt;br&gt;It would be possible to get up to 5hz using the EB-85A gpp reciever ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8266&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8266&lt;/a&gt;), although the GPS used for this tracker only supports 1 update per second.  I haven&#039;t looked at his code, but I believer that it would work &#039;out of the box&#039; using the eb-85a gps and log 5 samples per second.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I am working on a gps logger than also transmits the location and some sensor data back to a base station for rocket tracking applications.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://krazerlasers.com/gps/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://krazerlasers.com/gps/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@adam<br />It would be possible to get up to 5hz using the EB-85A gpp reciever ( <a href="http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8266" rel="nofollow">http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8266</a>), although the GPS used for this tracker only supports 1 update per second.  I haven&#8217;t looked at his code, but I believer that it would work &#8216;out of the box&#8217; using the eb-85a gps and log 5 samples per second.</p>
<p>BTW, I am working on a gps logger than also transmits the location and some sensor data back to a base station for rocket tracking applications.  <a href="http://krazerlasers.com/gps/" rel="nofollow">http://krazerlasers.com/gps/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dietfig</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37712</link>
		<dc:creator>dietfig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37712</guid>
		<description>Neat! Great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat! Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim K.</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37711</guid>
		<description>I approve of the disapproval of people posting their approval or disapproval of posts.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;End it already, the jokes gettin old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I approve of the disapproval of people posting their approval or disapproval of posts.  </p>
<p>End it already, the jokes gettin old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabien</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37710</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37710</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;This GPS is able to make a update every 1/5th second !&lt;br&gt;Fabien&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />This GPS is able to make a update every 1/5th second !<br />Fabien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjrh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37709</link>
		<dc:creator>jjrh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37709</guid>
		<description>Come on miked, we don&#039;t need your approval or disapproval for every post. It&#039;s getting a little old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on miked, we don&#8217;t need your approval or disapproval for every post. It&#8217;s getting a little old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcharper</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37708</link>
		<dc:creator>rcharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37708</guid>
		<description>Adam - To my knowledge 1 per second is standard.  To get better time stamps you need to implement an RTK (real time kinetics) system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8211; To my knowledge 1 per second is standard.  To get better time stamps you need to implement an RTK (real time kinetics) system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miked</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37707</link>
		<dc:creator>miked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37707</guid>
		<description>i approve of this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i approve of this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37706</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37706</guid>
		<description>awesome DIY work.  i have a general question, is it possible to make a gps update more than once per second?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome DIY work.  i have a general question, is it possible to make a gps update more than once per second?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37705</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37705</guid>
		<description>one more thing for the bat-belt :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one more thing for the bat-belt :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabien</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/comment-page-1/#comment-37704</link>
		<dc:creator>fabien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/25/nano-gps-logger/#comment-37704</guid>
		<description>as a big hackaday fan, I&#039;m very surprised and happy to find out the nano logger I&#039;ve done here :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note: it&#039;s build around PIC16F876, not PIC16F872.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Fabien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a big hackaday fan, I&#8217;m very surprised and happy to find out the nano logger I&#8217;ve done here :)</p>
<p>Note: it&#8217;s build around PIC16F876, not PIC16F872.</p>
<p>&#8211; Fabien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
