<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-paparazzi sunglasses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SimpleText</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37965</link>
		<dc:creator>SimpleText</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37965</guid>
		<description>?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simpletext</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37964</link>
		<dc:creator>simpletext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37964</guid>
		<description>wtf lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solenoidclock</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37963</link>
		<dc:creator>Solenoidclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37963</guid>
		<description>I did something similar to this about a month ago. I used twelve IR LEDs in throwie form to blot out the identities of myself and five friends during a mostly harmless prank on my high school. The viewing angle must&#039;ve been very broad, because nobody got any flack for it and no security pictures were used to fuel the subsequent manhunt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those interested, we were bonding traffic cones to the middles of a row of desirable parking spaces that the student council had greedily reserved for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did something similar to this about a month ago. I used twelve IR LEDs in throwie form to blot out the identities of myself and five friends during a mostly harmless prank on my high school. The viewing angle must&#8217;ve been very broad, because nobody got any flack for it and no security pictures were used to fuel the subsequent manhunt.</p>
<p>For those interested, we were bonding traffic cones to the middles of a row of desirable parking spaces that the student council had greedily reserved for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37962</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37962</guid>
		<description>Apparently my embed code was disabled (I assumed it would be). Here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vodwizard.com/video/462/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vodwizard.com/video/462/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently my embed code was disabled (I assumed it would be). Here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vodwizard.com/video/462/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vodwizard.com/video/462/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K1ngfunK</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37961</link>
		<dc:creator>K1ngfunK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37961</guid>
		<description>Since this really only works with low-light cameras, what about using the same idea, but with a different (perhaps illegal, but that&#039;s not the point :P ) implementation: installing several inside your car&#039;s license plate holder (around the license plate).  You could power them off the car&#039;s 12v signal, and I&#039;m thinking it would effectively white your license plate for any type of traffic monitoring camera.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem I see is knowing how a person could test this without knowing exactly what type of cameras are being used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this really only works with low-light cameras, what about using the same idea, but with a different (perhaps illegal, but that&#8217;s not the point :P ) implementation: installing several inside your car&#8217;s license plate holder (around the license plate).  You could power them off the car&#8217;s 12v signal, and I&#8217;m thinking it would effectively white your license plate for any type of traffic monitoring camera.</p>
<p>The problem I see is knowing how a person could test this without knowing exactly what type of cameras are being used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Ninja</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37960</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37960</guid>
		<description>Tried to make this,even with four IR LEDS, didn&#039;t work. Am I using IR leds not powerful enough? or is this video a fake?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can someone tell me if this is possible and where I can find the correct LED&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried to make this,even with four IR LEDS, didn&#8217;t work. Am I using IR leds not powerful enough? or is this video a fake?</p>
<p>Can someone tell me if this is possible and where I can find the correct LED&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37959</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37959</guid>
		<description>Good Idea.  I think I&#039;d make it just because it&#039;s interesting.  I have a camera that I removed the IR filter from, so this might be interesting to test it against that a normal camera with filer.  Anyway, the video you embedded has been removed from Medacafe so here&#039;s another one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Idea.  I think I&#8217;d make it just because it&#8217;s interesting.  I have a camera that I removed the IR filter from, so this might be interesting to test it against that a normal camera with filer.  Anyway, the video you embedded has been removed from Medacafe so here&#8217;s another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheKhakinator</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37958</link>
		<dc:creator>TheKhakinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37958</guid>
		<description>Ignoring IR filters, the LEDs would only show up as small white dots - just as high brightness white LEDs would.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This could /possibly/ work on a security cam set up for night vision with IR, but you&#039;d need a fuckton of LEDs, and at night, you&#039;d just make yourself MORE visible, not less, probably.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hack is fake, as previously stated. Why hasn&#039;t this post been edited to say that? The whole Pentium drink warmer post was corrected pretty quick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for autofocus - some cameras use IR rangefinding for autofocus. That&#039;s why it would mess with the autofocus. The IR autofocuses don&#039;t like windows either, cause of reflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring IR filters, the LEDs would only show up as small white dots &#8211; just as high brightness white LEDs would.</p>
<p>This could /possibly/ work on a security cam set up for night vision with IR, but you&#8217;d need a fuckton of LEDs, and at night, you&#8217;d just make yourself MORE visible, not less, probably.</p>
<p>The hack is fake, as previously stated. Why hasn&#8217;t this post been edited to say that? The whole Pentium drink warmer post was corrected pretty quick.</p>
<p>As for autofocus &#8211; some cameras use IR rangefinding for autofocus. That&#8217;s why it would mess with the autofocus. The IR autofocuses don&#8217;t like windows either, cause of reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmangwing</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37957</link>
		<dc:creator>kmangwing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37957</guid>
		<description>You guys totally posted something exactly like this a few months ago.  I&#039;ve been trying to find it but I can&#039;t seem to get the right post.  It was the same thing except the guy used goggles or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys totally posted something exactly like this a few months ago.  I&#8217;ve been trying to find it but I can&#8217;t seem to get the right post.  It was the same thing except the guy used goggles or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simpletext</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37956</link>
		<dc:creator>simpletext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37956</guid>
		<description>what if you spend alot of money on the hat idea and use some sort of IR laser beam array, perhaps several diodes with movable arc-style motors like club laser boxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if you spend alot of money on the hat idea and use some sort of IR laser beam array, perhaps several diodes with movable arc-style motors like club laser boxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pastasauce</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37955</link>
		<dc:creator>pastasauce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised Kip Kay didn&#039;t narrate this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised Kip Kay didn&#8217;t narrate this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seamus Dubh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37954</link>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Dubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37954</guid>
		<description>The concept is great, just used for the wrong thing this is more of a &quot;Anti-Big Brother&quot; type thing.&lt;br&gt;As some have stated, this I really infective against your common photo type cameras, they have Ir filters.&lt;br&gt;What this is great for are &#039;Low Light&#039; cameras, i.e. security cameras, they usually use Ir lamps for illumination at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept is great, just used for the wrong thing this is more of a &#8220;Anti-Big Brother&#8221; type thing.<br />As some have stated, this I really infective against your common photo type cameras, they have Ir filters.<br />What this is great for are &#8216;Low Light&#8217; cameras, i.e. security cameras, they usually use Ir lamps for illumination at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigD145</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37953</link>
		<dc:creator>BigD145</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37953</guid>
		<description>A hat with lithium cell inside and some IR style cree&#039;s will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hat with lithium cell inside and some IR style cree&#8217;s will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joen</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37952</link>
		<dc:creator>joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37952</guid>
		<description>but should be useful against night-vision cameras using ir, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but should be useful against night-vision cameras using ir, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blankthemuffin</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/comment-page-1/#comment-37951</link>
		<dc:creator>blankthemuffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/27/anti-paparazzi-sunglasses/#comment-37951</guid>
		<description>Heh, it&#039;s not a fake hack, it just doesn&#039;t work with alot of cameras because they have IR filters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This would be extremely effective against night cameras which use IR spotlights to discreetly light an area to the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, it&#8217;s not a fake hack, it just doesn&#8217;t work with alot of cameras because they have IR filters.</p>
<p>This would be extremely effective against night cameras which use IR spotlights to discreetly light an area to the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
