<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create your own HDR images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-84286</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-84286</guid>
		<description>I have been using QTPFSGUI for a few years now!! It&#039;s great.  Check out my tutorial at www.freehdr.blogspot.com

There is a lot of negativity toward HDR images and new techniques but there always is at the beginning.  Give it a try!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using QTPFSGUI for a few years now!! It&#8217;s great.  Check out my tutorial at <a href="http://www.freehdr.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.freehdr.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>There is a lot of negativity toward HDR images and new techniques but there always is at the beginning.  Give it a try!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoshop guy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-65190</link>
		<dc:creator>photoshop guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-65190</guid>
		<description>I wanted to comment and thank the author, good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to comment and thank the author, good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbr</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38141</link>
		<dc:creator>jbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38141</guid>
		<description>hi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i download the programs  i will give it try&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>i download the programs  i will give it try</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38140</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38140</guid>
		<description>well i find deeply disturbing that it almost looks like a CGI render you would normally find on PC games (well, maybe not nowadays, these kids with their gaming rigs and such...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i find deeply disturbing that it almost looks like a CGI render you would normally find on PC games (well, maybe not nowadays, these kids with their gaming rigs and such&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Odle</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38139</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Odle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38139</guid>
		<description>As the one who created the linked images, I wanted to respond to the comments here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, to those who express the sentiment that the only &#039;valid&#039; HDR is the kind that uses the more realistic tonemapping algorithms...get off your high horse please and step down to Planet Earth.  There is no *right* when it comes to Art, or any medium used to create it.  When I created the images above, I intentionally selected my tonemapping algorithm and variables to trash them up.  My intention was to create something gritty and convey the feel of the revised-urban nature of the downtown where I live while leaving them unretouched in the traditional sense.  The intent wasn&#039;t to accurately render them in the sense that WYSIWYG, the intent was to create art.  Duh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, there seems to be some confusion though in that some folks think that many of the HDR images they&#039;ve seen have not been tonemapped.  You can choose to not tonemap an HDR image but it will look like crap on a regular monitor...will seem like it needs a major contrast adjustment.  Nearly *all* HDR images that you see on a regular monitor have been tonemapped, but some algorithms just produce a more realistic result than others.  In fact, you can see this in another item in my HDR set (the Sears Tower view).  Again though, for these images I made a specific choice in my tonemapping algorithm to achieve a specific artistic result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, if you just don&#039;t like them that&#039;s perfectly fine by me.  Quite honestly, that&#039;s what art is all about and there&#039;s no accounting for taste.  Even bad taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the one who created the linked images, I wanted to respond to the comments here.</p>
<p>First, to those who express the sentiment that the only &#8216;valid&#8217; HDR is the kind that uses the more realistic tonemapping algorithms&#8230;get off your high horse please and step down to Planet Earth.  There is no *right* when it comes to Art, or any medium used to create it.  When I created the images above, I intentionally selected my tonemapping algorithm and variables to trash them up.  My intention was to create something gritty and convey the feel of the revised-urban nature of the downtown where I live while leaving them unretouched in the traditional sense.  The intent wasn&#8217;t to accurately render them in the sense that WYSIWYG, the intent was to create art.  Duh.</p>
<p>Second, there seems to be some confusion though in that some folks think that many of the HDR images they&#8217;ve seen have not been tonemapped.  You can choose to not tonemap an HDR image but it will look like crap on a regular monitor&#8230;will seem like it needs a major contrast adjustment.  Nearly *all* HDR images that you see on a regular monitor have been tonemapped, but some algorithms just produce a more realistic result than others.  In fact, you can see this in another item in my HDR set (the Sears Tower view).  Again though, for these images I made a specific choice in my tonemapping algorithm to achieve a specific artistic result.</p>
<p>Finally, if you just don&#8217;t like them that&#8217;s perfectly fine by me.  Quite honestly, that&#8217;s what art is all about and there&#8217;s no accounting for taste.  Even bad taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgugi</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38138</link>
		<dc:creator>bgugi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38138</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=224&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=224&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i am really sick of the &#039;brown is real&#039; movement in graphics. seriously guys, its getting annoying. i&#039;m sick of seeing perfectly good images washed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=224" rel="nofollow">http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=224</a></p>
<p>i am really sick of the &#8216;brown is real&#8217; movement in graphics. seriously guys, its getting annoying. i&#8217;m sick of seeing perfectly good images washed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38137</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38137</guid>
		<description>&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t really consider the surrealistic looking images to be true HDR (High Dynamic Range) images, but more of a byproduct of applying a HDR process (just think of it as another filter or action in Photoshop.)  IMHO, true HDR images should capture what normally would have been lost in the limited latitude in a film image or digital sensor.  More closely reflecting what our own eyes are able to see of the scene.  Here&#039;s some HDR images that I did at my vacation last year (yeah the first one does look a little halo-y around the top of the hills, but I couldn&#039;t get it to blend with enough luminance otherwise.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://leftyloosy.com/lakepowellhdr.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://leftyloosy.com/lakepowellhdr.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really consider the surrealistic looking images to be true HDR (High Dynamic Range) images, but more of a byproduct of applying a HDR process (just think of it as another filter or action in Photoshop.)  IMHO, true HDR images should capture what normally would have been lost in the limited latitude in a film image or digital sensor.  More closely reflecting what our own eyes are able to see of the scene.  Here&#8217;s some HDR images that I did at my vacation last year (yeah the first one does look a little halo-y around the top of the hills, but I couldn&#8217;t get it to blend with enough luminance otherwise.)</p>
<p><a href="http://leftyloosy.com/lakepowellhdr.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://leftyloosy.com/lakepowellhdr.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38136</guid>
		<description>It, personally, annoys me when people refer to tonemapped images as HDR. They are two very different things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the continued discrepancies between unaltered photography and HDR/Tonemapping, I feel that both have their place. Each can be visually appealing, depending on how presented. It took me a while to even want to switch to digital, simply because I felt it was destroying my creative process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;QtpfsGUI is an awesome piece of software, if you&#039;re looking for multiple tonemapping algorithms to play around with. I don&#039;t recommend running every photo you take through here, but some are going to be breath-taking, just like a well-composed photograph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It, personally, annoys me when people refer to tonemapped images as HDR. They are two very different things.</p>
<p>As for the continued discrepancies between unaltered photography and HDR/Tonemapping, I feel that both have their place. Each can be visually appealing, depending on how presented. It took me a while to even want to switch to digital, simply because I felt it was destroying my creative process.</p>
<p>QtpfsGUI is an awesome piece of software, if you&#8217;re looking for multiple tonemapping algorithms to play around with. I don&#8217;t recommend running every photo you take through here, but some are going to be breath-taking, just like a well-composed photograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfcoder</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38135</link>
		<dc:creator>alfcoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38135</guid>
		<description>i think its a great way to capture images, the result would be more like as it was captured by our eyes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;few days ago i was scanned a very little part from a cd-rom (the photo-detector) with my scanner and the result was not so great, but as i converted the picture to lab color space from rgb i&#039;ve noticed how much more information was in the two color channel so i was converted the lightnes and the two color channels to one grayscale image and adjusted the levels, the result was a more informative image...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its a great way to capture images, the result would be more like as it was captured by our eyes</p>
<p>few days ago i was scanned a very little part from a cd-rom (the photo-detector) with my scanner and the result was not so great, but as i converted the picture to lab color space from rgb i&#8217;ve noticed how much more information was in the two color channel so i was converted the lightnes and the two color channels to one grayscale image and adjusted the levels, the result was a more informative image&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fartface</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38134</link>
		<dc:creator>fartface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38134</guid>
		<description>Is everyone too lazy to buy the right filters and gear to take photos anymore?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A plate filter mount and a good gradient ND filter will do most HDR work that people are after.  I have used 2 Gradient ND&#039;s in a plate filter on the front of my Rebel XT to create pretty much the top image in one single click of the shutter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Digital photographers should be forced to shoot film for a few months to actually learn photography before they touch a digital.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;YES! There is a place for HDR, but 90% of the photos, if shot right would not need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everyone too lazy to buy the right filters and gear to take photos anymore?</p>
<p>A plate filter mount and a good gradient ND filter will do most HDR work that people are after.  I have used 2 Gradient ND&#8217;s in a plate filter on the front of my Rebel XT to create pretty much the top image in one single click of the shutter.</p>
<p>Digital photographers should be forced to shoot film for a few months to actually learn photography before they touch a digital.</p>
<p>YES! There is a place for HDR, but 90% of the photos, if shot right would not need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKM</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38133</link>
		<dc:creator>PKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38133</guid>
		<description>1, 6, 7: I agree.  People seem to automatically associate &quot;hdr&quot; with these oversaturated bizarro pictures, when (iirc) the original point of hdr was to extend the dynamic range of the camera to get more lighting detail out of a shot like a sunset.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not normally one for plugging but there&#039;s an instructable on how to do hdr (the subtle lighting-enhancing sort not the surreal photomatix sort) with no magic tools or downloadable photoshop actions, just a few simple photoshop/gimp procedures at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.instructables.com/id/HDR-photos-with-the-GIMP/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.instructables.com/id/HDR-photos-with-the-GIMP/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I apologise for the incredible wordiness, if you know your way around the gimp you can probably do it in half the time I described there (I was a n00b at the time of writing and haven&#039;t updated it yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1, 6, 7: I agree.  People seem to automatically associate &#8220;hdr&#8221; with these oversaturated bizarro pictures, when (iirc) the original point of hdr was to extend the dynamic range of the camera to get more lighting detail out of a shot like a sunset.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not normally one for plugging but there&#8217;s an instructable on how to do hdr (the subtle lighting-enhancing sort not the surreal photomatix sort) with no magic tools or downloadable photoshop actions, just a few simple photoshop/gimp procedures at <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/HDR-photos-with-the-GIMP/" rel="nofollow">http://www.instructables.com/id/HDR-photos-with-the-GIMP/</a></p>
<p>I apologise for the incredible wordiness, if you know your way around the gimp you can probably do it in half the time I described there (I was a n00b at the time of writing and haven&#8217;t updated it yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valve</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38132</link>
		<dc:creator>valve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38132</guid>
		<description>Apparently, &#039;HDR&#039; has become synonym to these types of overly artistic PhotoMatix-esque tonemapped images which - don&#039;t get me wrong - do serve some purpose in the &#039;looks nice&#039; department but are far from what I would consider HDR to be: a method to overcome limitations of (digital) cameras with regards to recording lightintensity, creating a realistic looking photo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, &#8216;HDR&#8217; has become synonym to these types of overly artistic PhotoMatix-esque tonemapped images which &#8211; don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; do serve some purpose in the &#8216;looks nice&#8217; department but are far from what I would consider HDR to be: a method to overcome limitations of (digital) cameras with regards to recording lightintensity, creating a realistic looking photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O.</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38131</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38131</guid>
		<description>@1&lt;br&gt;When done correctly and subtly it can provide some great results. Most people however fail completely during the tone mapping process and churn out garbage&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HDR can&#039;t(read: shouldn&#039;t) be used in all photographs and it should be used sparingly and as subtly as possible - if used in such a way it can be a valuable tool for photographers to capture otherwise impossible photographs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another subject worth looking into is exposure blending which through a somewhat similar process can extend your image&#039;s dynamic range but by doing so without intoducing the telltale HDR signs such has the halos around areas of contrast. Exposure blending: &lt;a href=&quot;http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital-blending.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital-blending.shtml&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1<br />When done correctly and subtly it can provide some great results. Most people however fail completely during the tone mapping process and churn out garbage</p>
<p>HDR can&#8217;t(read: shouldn&#8217;t) be used in all photographs and it should be used sparingly and as subtly as possible &#8211; if used in such a way it can be a valuable tool for photographers to capture otherwise impossible photographs. </p>
<p>Another subject worth looking into is exposure blending which through a somewhat similar process can extend your image&#8217;s dynamic range but by doing so without intoducing the telltale HDR signs such has the halos around areas of contrast. Exposure blending: <a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital-blending.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/digital-blending.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smilr</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38130</link>
		<dc:creator>smilr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38130</guid>
		<description>I wonder how these would appear on a higher bitdepth screen? Would a high contrast ratio, 30Bit lcd panel do them justice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how these would appear on a higher bitdepth screen? Would a high contrast ratio, 30Bit lcd panel do them justice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/comment-page-1/#comment-38129</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/06/30/create-your-own-hdr-images/#comment-38129</guid>
		<description>Very cool, if I didn&#039;t know I would&#039;ve guessed the HDR image was just a good computer render, as apposed to a pic of something real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool, if I didn&#8217;t know I would&#8217;ve guessed the HDR image was just a good computer render, as apposed to a pic of something real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
