<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NVIDIA&#8217;s problems worse than expected?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@2,3: Better to hold your tongue and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dan&#039;s Data just did a round-up of current-gen video cards, and he (like me) agrees with #6 about the 4850.  That&#039;s the go-to card for value right now.  I just have to upgrade my ancient rig to a PCI-E motherboard -- somehow I&#039;m stil chugging along with a P4P800-E...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2,3: Better to hold your tongue and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it.</p>
<p>Dan&#8217;s Data just did a round-up of current-gen video cards, and he (like me) agrees with #6 about the 4850.  That&#8217;s the go-to card for value right now.  I just have to upgrade my ancient rig to a PCI-E motherboard &#8212; somehow I&#8217;m stil chugging along with a P4P800-E&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miles</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[amd/ati has been the standard means of referring to the graphics company (the artist formerly known as ati?) for quite a few months now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;l see some people are still out of the loop, but it is becoming standard practice to simply call them AMD graphics cards/chips now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For $200 the 4850 looks to be a killer card, wish I could get one.  I am waiting on software from iZ3d to allow my dual polarized stereoscopic LCD rig to work on cards other than legacy nVidia products for OpenGL and DirectX video games.  If you don&#039;t game in stereo vision, you might as well poke one of your eyes out.  see mtbs3d.com for info and stereo screen caps from recent games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amd/ati has been the standard means of referring to the graphics company (the artist formerly known as ati?) for quite a few months now.</p>
<p>l see some people are still out of the loop, but it is becoming standard practice to simply call them AMD graphics cards/chips now.</p>
<p>For $200 the 4850 looks to be a killer card, wish I could get one.  I am waiting on software from iZ3d to allow my dual polarized stereoscopic LCD rig to work on cards other than legacy nVidia products for OpenGL and DirectX video games.  If you don&#8217;t game in stereo vision, you might as well poke one of your eyes out.  see mtbs3d.com for info and stereo screen caps from recent games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@2, 3&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;amd bought ati almost 2 years ago, all recent ati cards are considered to be amd products. you lose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2, 3</p>
<p>amd bought ati almost 2 years ago, all recent ati cards are considered to be amd products. you lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gyro_john</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gyro_john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD bought ATI.  Flameage ill-considered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD bought ATI.  Flameage ill-considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahahaha! nicholas, you&#039;re a hoot. have fun reading this on your &quot;amd&quot; video card.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahaha! nicholas, you&#8217;re a hoot. have fun reading this on your &#8220;amd&#8221; video card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhojflow</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nhojflow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@nicholas lombardy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;amd? hmm, ok... wtf? im sure you mean ati. and you are still wrong. funny how that works, isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nicholas lombardy,</p>
<p>amd? hmm, ok&#8230; wtf? im sure you mean ati. and you are still wrong. funny how that works, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Lombardy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-38787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Lombardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/11/nvidias-problems-worse-than-expected/#comment-38787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is yet another reason AMD continues to provide the better value...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is yet another reason AMD continues to provide the better value&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

