<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tennis for Two resurrected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:38:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FreshPrince</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-77785</link>
		<dc:creator>FreshPrince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-77785</guid>
		<description>I usually don&#039;t post in blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually don&#8217;t post in blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39153</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McDonnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39153</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t there versions of this game and pong hidden in some of the newer digital scopes? I forget the brand, but I am sure that I read about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t there versions of this game and pong hidden in some of the newer digital scopes? I forget the brand, but I am sure that I read about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39152</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39152</guid>
		<description>I just found the schematics for the original analog version:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerspacefan.com/TennisForTwo.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.computerspacefan.com/TennisForTwo.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found the schematics for the original analog version:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerspacefan.com/TennisForTwo.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerspacefan.com/TennisForTwo.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39151</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39151</guid>
		<description>Yea but without the mechanical relays, you don&#039;t get the same tactile feedback as the original :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea but without the mechanical relays, you don&#8217;t get the same tactile feedback as the original :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39150</guid>
		<description>The original version...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2E9iSQfGdg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2E9iSQfGdg&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original version&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2E9iSQfGdg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2E9iSQfGdg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solenoidclock</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39149</link>
		<dc:creator>Solenoidclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39149</guid>
		<description>I have so much more motivation to pick up a scope now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have so much more motivation to pick up a scope now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39148</guid>
		<description>#1: It&#039;s a dual-trace scope, but you need two channels to get X-Y capability.  Like other oscilloscope vector display projects, it&#039;s not drawing the ball with a separate trace than the ground and the net.  If you change the analog voltages fast enough, you don&#039;t leave a visible line on the scope, at least when the intensity isn&#039;t cranked up all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: It&#8217;s a dual-trace scope, but you need two channels to get X-Y capability.  Like other oscilloscope vector display projects, it&#8217;s not drawing the ball with a separate trace than the ground and the net.  If you change the analog voltages fast enough, you don&#8217;t leave a visible line on the scope, at least when the intensity isn&#8217;t cranked up all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeBD</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/comment-page-1/#comment-39147</link>
		<dc:creator>HeBD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/07/16/tennis-for-two-resurrected/#comment-39147</guid>
		<description>wow took me a minuet to realise how they detached the ball from the rest of the trace so well... they didnt! its a dual trace scope lol.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;no info on the original design. with digital accessible and easy to do i think a rebuild of the old &#039;analog computer&#039; version would be much more interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;imo the scope clock is way better... &lt;a href=&quot;http://dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow took me a minuet to realise how they detached the ball from the rest of the trace so well&#8230; they didnt! its a dual trace scope lol.</p>
<p>no info on the original design. with digital accessible and easy to do i think a rebuild of the old &#8216;analog computer&#8217; version would be much more interesting.</p>
<p>imo the scope clock is way better&#8230; <a href="http://dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm" rel="nofollow">http://dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
