<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security flaw allows full access to locked iPhones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc0de</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/comment-page-1/#comment-41347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dc0de]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/#comment-41347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;1. This is no surprise. Just like with most other devices, if you can gain physical access to it, its pretty much &quot;owned&quot; already. This is why, if you use Exchange as the back end, you can remotely wipe the device if you lose it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Posted at 12:28PM on Aug 28th 2008 by JF&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, except for Enterprise ready devices, like the Blackberry... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a reason for FIPS-140-2 compliance...&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;1. This is no surprise. Just like with most other devices, if you can gain physical access to it, its pretty much &#8220;owned&#8221; already. This is why, if you use Exchange as the back end, you can remotely wipe the device if you lose it.</p>
<p>Posted at 12:28PM on Aug 28th 2008 by JF&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, except for Enterprise ready devices, like the Blackberry&#8230; </p>
<p>There is a reason for FIPS-140-2 compliance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/comment-page-1/#comment-41346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.iheartcashews.com:8181/2008/08/28/security-flaw-allows-full-access-to-locked-iphones/#comment-41346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is no surprise. Just like with most other devices, if you can gain physical access to it, its pretty much &quot;owned&quot; already.  This is why, if you use Exchange as the back end, you can remotely wipe the device if you lose it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is no surprise. Just like with most other devices, if you can gain physical access to it, its pretty much &#8220;owned&#8221; already.  This is why, if you use Exchange as the back end, you can remotely wipe the device if you lose it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

