<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting insecurities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: baron</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-47552</link>
		<dc:creator>baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-47552</guid>
		<description>What was wrong with paper ballots?
Oh yeah. They&#039;re harder to rig the vote with. That was the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was wrong with paper ballots?<br />
Oh yeah. They&#8217;re harder to rig the vote with. That was the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42160</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42160</guid>
		<description>Wow.  They REALLY should use some form of security screw to hold together that tabulator cabinet.

The electronic machine exploits are more concerning to me.  One only needs to place an infected thumb drive in the election headquarters to have a good shot at infecting a LOT of machines.  That&#039;s the point, you don&#039;t really need system level access. You just need to be able to get it in the room</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  They REALLY should use some form of security screw to hold together that tabulator cabinet.</p>
<p>The electronic machine exploits are more concerning to me.  One only needs to place an infected thumb drive in the election headquarters to have a good shot at infecting a LOT of machines.  That&#8217;s the point, you don&#8217;t really need system level access. You just need to be able to get it in the room</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42099</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42099</guid>
		<description>Does anyone still think Obama has a chance in hell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone still think Obama has a chance in hell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42075</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42075</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight: Someone with system level access modifies some code and this is suposed to show how easy it is to hack a voting machine? If you have someone with system level acess, they had better be trusted or this little bit of non-hacking is the least of the damage they could cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight: Someone with system level access modifies some code and this is suposed to show how easy it is to hack a voting machine? If you have someone with system level acess, they had better be trusted or this little bit of non-hacking is the least of the damage they could cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42071</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42071</guid>
		<description>If EVERYTHING in the video is taken at face value, that&#039;s pretty damming.  However I don&#039;t think many of those attacks are particularly feasible, as they require a lot of social engineering and a breakdown in several steps. You also have to take these &quot;researchers&quot; at their word about the contents of the USB, the firmware and the trojans.  I don&#039;t find the paper trail tests valid because of if the hack can register a vote different than the paper trail, then why does it ever show a difference from the voter&#039;s on screen choice.  I&#039;m less concerned with the voting machine hacks as I am with the tabulator hacks. Its much easier to influence an election when you have access to all the votes ;p.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If EVERYTHING in the video is taken at face value, that&#8217;s pretty damming.  However I don&#8217;t think many of those attacks are particularly feasible, as they require a lot of social engineering and a breakdown in several steps. You also have to take these &#8220;researchers&#8221; at their word about the contents of the USB, the firmware and the trojans.  I don&#8217;t find the paper trail tests valid because of if the hack can register a vote different than the paper trail, then why does it ever show a difference from the voter&#8217;s on screen choice.  I&#8217;m less concerned with the voting machine hacks as I am with the tabulator hacks. Its much easier to influence an election when you have access to all the votes ;p.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42065</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42065</guid>
		<description>This should be a matter of public record. Voters beware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a matter of public record. Voters beware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Ryall</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-42026</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Ryall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-42026</guid>
		<description>I think this exploit has already been used, how else do you think a retarded cowboy got two terms in office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this exploit has already been used, how else do you think a retarded cowboy got two terms in office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41886</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41886</guid>
		<description>big josh, I think you&#039;re missing the point: the system
 is infected by the operator himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big josh, I think you&#8217;re missing the point: the system<br />
 is infected by the operator himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Josh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41853</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41853</guid>
		<description>I think this is just an example of failing to apply old 
concepts to new technologies. This is like having a 
ballot box without a lock on it. And I think the solution 
to this problem quite simple; put a lockable access door
over the ports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is just an example of failing to apply old<br />
concepts to new technologies. This is like having a<br />
ballot box without a lock on it. And I think the solution<br />
to this problem quite simple; put a lockable access door<br />
over the ports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41843</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41843</guid>
		<description>What the hell that is insane that is too easy.
Thank god the democrats and republicans dont have access to loads of
money and fanatical supporters or the american democracy would be in
peril. Oh wait.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell that is insane that is too easy.<br />
Thank god the democrats and republicans dont have access to loads of<br />
money and fanatical supporters or the american democracy would be in<br />
peril. Oh wait&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Williams</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41742</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41742</guid>
		<description>Did any one see &quot;Man of the Year&quot; with Robin Williams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did any one see &#8220;Man of the Year&#8221; with Robin Williams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fruzzetti</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Fruzzetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41734</guid>
		<description>holy crap i think you&#039;re right.  i wonder what other companies would get that pissed about being exposed?  what about posting the mythbusters episode about rfid?  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy crap i think you&#8217;re right.  i wonder what other companies would get that pissed about being exposed?  what about posting the mythbusters episode about rfid?  :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/12/voting-insecurities/comment-page-1/#comment-41727</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=2875#comment-41727</guid>
		<description>Ahh so this explains all your DoS troubles! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh so this explains all your DoS troubles! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
