Comments on: Apple tries to stop sneaker hackers

By: lol

lol — Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:23:16 +0000

^ Troll much?
|

By: Debbie New Designer Fashion

Debbie New Designer Fashion — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:33:50 +0000

Howdy I found this site by chance, I was searching Bing for New Fashion Designers when I found your site, I must say your site is really great I truely think the theme, its astounding!. I don't have the time in this instance to entirely absorb your webpage but I have favorited it and also subscribed for your RSS feeds. I will be back when I free up some time. Thank you for a great website.

By: tvaughan

tvaughan — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:22:04 +0000

sneakers

By: fashion blog

fashion blog — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:31:59 +0000

it is unbelievably, oh wait, yes it can be believable :-D But it sux, tht suits for apple.

By: Nitori

Nitori — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:00:01 +0000

You know this has to be the most pointless thing I’ve ever seen just use both sensors if you want to use it on a different shoe.
I think this is more to prevent people from making their own software to use the sensors vs only allow them to be used in a crappy nike shoe since it would take me what 3 minutes to make it work on any old shoe.
The DRM is likely something idiot simple like a 64bit hash.
But really Apple has become very lame these past few years and DRM is never cool or hip.

By: injailfortagpulling

injailfortagpulling — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:51:20 +0000

remember that escaped convict from PeeWee that said he pulled off a tag?

By: therian

therian — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:39:07 +0000

why buy cripple hardware in the first place ?

By: jose

jose — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:30:19 +0000

this just seems like an excercise in futility… It will be just as easy to pull that second sensor off of the “piece of clothing” and put it next to your Ipod receiver, and THEN duct-tape that to your old pair of New Balance running shoes…

Oooh.. we could put TWO sensors… surely these college-educated software/electrical/mechanical/Industrial design engineering-educated hackers wouldn’t be able to figure that out…

By: Adam Ziegler

Adam Ziegler — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:30:40 +0000

Tom… doesn’t the shoe also have a sensor that the ‘portable’ sensor is paired up with?

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:09:51 +0000

Wow, so dumb. People don’t “cut” the sensors out of their shoes either. They come seperate and are placed in a pocket in the shoe. I don’t understand how people can run a site like this and not dp their fucking research.

By: sly

sly — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:38:09 +0000

the shoes aren’t bound to their feet and have been loosed :-p

By: collin

collin — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:31:01 +0000

WHAT DO YOU MEAN LOOSE SHOES

By: shawn

shawn — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:20:45 +0000

Hum, guess I will be looking at those sneakers along the
roadsides a little closer now.

Amazes me how many people loose shoes out on the highways.

By: BigD145

BigD145 — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:43:51 +0000

If I don’t sell it or claim I designed it, it’s not a patent violation.

By: DR

DR — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:03:39 +0000

Hack a Day (and sites like this one) could help the hacking community by refusing to cover crippled product offerings like this one. Instead, there are no less than three Apple posts on the front page.