<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DIY vertical axis wind turbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: juan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-557153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[juan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-557153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my son picked your first VAWT as a school science project and i was wondering if you can send me the how to build with parts list. i see the 2nd build moves quicker then the first and i would like to build to compare the differances as well.
can you send the how to and parts list. would you prefer the amertek 38 or the windblue?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my son picked your first VAWT as a school science project and i was wondering if you can send me the how to build with parts list. i see the 2nd build moves quicker then the first and i would like to build to compare the differances as well.<br />
can you send the how to and parts list. would you prefer the amertek 38 or the windblue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Reed</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-139261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunter Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 00:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-139261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind power is a good source of electricity but it also takes up lots of space just like solar power plants.*.:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind power is a good source of electricity but it also takes up lots of space just like solar power plants.*.:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teco</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-120085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-120085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we don&#039;t see vertical turbines using the common sheet metal ventilation turbines that we sometimes see on roof of houses, shops, etc? If they work ($30)it would be a cheap way to make power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why we don&#8217;t see vertical turbines using the common sheet metal ventilation turbines that we sometimes see on roof of houses, shops, etc? If they work ($30)it would be a cheap way to make power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bracken</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-111544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bracken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-111544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a neat design. I love how tall it is. The basic design is a savinious, my personal favorite, which typicall gets about 15% eff (out of betz max of 59%). The capture area is only half the swep area though.
Two good websites to check out are &lt;a href=&quot;http://centurionenergy.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;centurionenergy.net&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http:otherpower.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;otherpower.org&lt;/a&gt; for more ideas for building wind turbines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a neat design. I love how tall it is. The basic design is a savinious, my personal favorite, which typicall gets about 15% eff (out of betz max of 59%). The capture area is only half the swep area though.<br />
Two good websites to check out are <a href="http://centurionenergy.net" rel="nofollow">centurionenergy.net</a> and <a href="http:otherpower.org" rel="nofollow">otherpower.org</a> for more ideas for building wind turbines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R-fa Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-99257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R-fa Rabbit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-99257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love it! Great to reduce your carbon footprint...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! Great to reduce your carbon footprint&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHOPRA</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-81144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CHOPRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-81144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTERESTED IN VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE GENERATORS - REGULAR - BULK QUANTITIES FOR INDIA. INVITE COMMNUCATION .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTERESTED IN VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE GENERATORS &#8211; REGULAR &#8211; BULK QUANTITIES FOR INDIA. INVITE COMMNUCATION .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: home made wind generators</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-79448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[home made wind generators]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-79448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engaging article,, will come back soon:D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engaging article,, will come back soon:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: home made wind generators</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-79436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[home made wind generators]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-79436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intelligent writing- will definitely come back again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent writing- will definitely come back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-47919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-47919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we produce and sell wind turbine : www.worldwindturbine.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we produce and sell wind turbine : <a href="http://www.worldwindturbine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldwindturbine.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faroun</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-44480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[faroun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-44480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey guys you should check out the V8 that i build last week...it is at instructables and youtube..

enjoy..

regards

faroun]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys you should check out the V8 that i build last week&#8230;it is at instructables and youtube..</p>
<p>enjoy..</p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>faroun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD5OS</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-44431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AD5OS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-44431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just checked out the website.... Lots of fun projects... many that would be really easy to find parts and great educational value.

I&#039;d recommend you try some sort of transmission to get higher rpms in your generator from your turbine.  And I&#039;d recommend you hook up a rather large capacitor across your generator before you hook it up to a load so that when the turbine first starts turning it charges up the cap before it sees the load.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checked out the website&#8230;. Lots of fun projects&#8230; many that would be really easy to find parts and great educational value.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend you try some sort of transmission to get higher rpms in your generator from your turbine.  And I&#8217;d recommend you hook up a rather large capacitor across your generator before you hook it up to a load so that when the turbine first starts turning it charges up the cap before it sees the load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damorian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-44381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damorian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-44381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome, I&#039;ve actually been thinking about making one of these.  Imho they seem better than the traditional ones since they take up less space so these actually open up the possibility of putting them in even the smallest of yards, even though they are considerably less efficient.  How would a different number of &quot;fins&quot; affect it?  Would it be the same as the traditional dutch style where the more fins the more torque and vice-versa?  From what I gather that one has 10... I might try making one with 8 if I ever find the time...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, I&#8217;ve actually been thinking about making one of these.  Imho they seem better than the traditional ones since they take up less space so these actually open up the possibility of putting them in even the smallest of yards, even though they are considerably less efficient.  How would a different number of &#8220;fins&#8221; affect it?  Would it be the same as the traditional dutch style where the more fins the more torque and vice-versa?  From what I gather that one has 10&#8230; I might try making one with 8 if I ever find the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Grundy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-44246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Grundy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-44246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think VAWTs have much potential despite the inefficiencies pointed out already. Even though they have a low output, the sweet spot will be in mass amounts of small turbines ganged together. For example lining the sides of a highway will harvest the low altitude wind from passing vehicles. The low cost of manufacture will outweigh the occasional loss of nodes due to idiot drivers :-)

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think VAWTs have much potential despite the inefficiencies pointed out already. Even though they have a low output, the sweet spot will be in mass amounts of small turbines ganged together. For example lining the sides of a highway will harvest the low altitude wind from passing vehicles. The low cost of manufacture will outweigh the occasional loss of nodes due to idiot drivers :-)</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faroun</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-43949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[faroun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-43949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i had it going arround 400 to 500 rpm and all i got is8.5 volts, i think it will spinn apart if gone any faster.

faroun]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had it going arround 400 to 500 rpm and all i got is8.5 volts, i think it will spinn apart if gone any faster.</p>
<p>faroun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/09/28/diy-vertical-axis-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-43925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=3894#comment-43925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Permanent magnet maglev is basically a magnetic bearing, a not that uncommon mechanical engineering solution. Put the north poles of two powerful magnets together and you get repulsion. You can use this to suspend the weight of the rotor and thus minimize the friction. Using several magnets together you can also shape a complex magnetic field that would hold a rotor up and keep it centered. Less friction equals more efficiency. Would that makeup for a difference in aerodynamics? no idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Permanent magnet maglev is basically a magnetic bearing, a not that uncommon mechanical engineering solution. Put the north poles of two powerful magnets together and you get repulsion. You can use this to suspend the weight of the rotor and thus minimize the friction. Using several magnets together you can also shape a complex magnetic field that would hold a rotor up and keep it centered. Less friction equals more efficiency. Would that makeup for a difference in aerodynamics? no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

