<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techspansion closes it&#8217;s doors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/10/04/techspansion-closes-its-doors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/04/techspansion-closes-its-doors/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: floppy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/04/techspansion-closes-its-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-44578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[floppy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4280#comment-44578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This example shows better than a thousand words why one should always choose Open Source software whenever possible over the closed equivalent.
I&#039;m amazed looking at how many closed source companies advertise their software as reliable when the mere fact of being closed poses a huge risk for the customer. If the company closes, is bought by another one not interested in further development of the product, the product reaches its planned obsolescence etc, the customer is screwed plain and simple. With Open Source, even in the worst case scenario, say the developer dies one day after releasing the software, you still have the chance to hire someone else to work on the source code.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This example shows better than a thousand words why one should always choose Open Source software whenever possible over the closed equivalent.<br />
I&#8217;m amazed looking at how many closed source companies advertise their software as reliable when the mere fact of being closed poses a huge risk for the customer. If the company closes, is bought by another one not interested in further development of the product, the product reaches its planned obsolescence etc, the customer is screwed plain and simple. With Open Source, even in the worst case scenario, say the developer dies one day after releasing the software, you still have the chance to hire someone else to work on the source code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/04/techspansion-closes-its-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-44341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pascal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4280#comment-44341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[huh, they closed down the company, and the software just goes away?! they could at least have open sourced it... (Netscape died very nicely this way, and see what rose from its ashes...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh, they closed down the company, and the software just goes away?! they could at least have open sourced it&#8230; (Netscape died very nicely this way, and see what rose from its ashes&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

