<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo&#8217;s guide to smartphone OSes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jash Sayani</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jash Sayani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45325</guid>
		<description>1. iPhone OS
2. Windows Mobile
3. RIM Blackberry OS
4. Android (Still not fully developed)
5. Symbian. (Very bad Application support.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. iPhone OS<br />
2. Windows Mobile<br />
3. RIM Blackberry OS<br />
4. Android (Still not fully developed)<br />
5. Symbian. (Very bad Application support.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45322</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45322</guid>
		<description>Anyone know of a guide that compares them from a developer&#039;s standpoint?

For instance, for WM my impression is that you can program with the same APIs as you would use for .Net on windows. If you could use the same code base (or almost the same codebase) for both a phone version and a desktop version of a program, that could be extremely attractive. How true is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know of a guide that compares them from a developer&#8217;s standpoint?</p>
<p>For instance, for WM my impression is that you can program with the same APIs as you would use for .Net on windows. If you could use the same code base (or almost the same codebase) for both a phone version and a desktop version of a program, that could be extremely attractive. How true is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbot</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45273</link>
		<dc:creator>jbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45273</guid>
		<description>wow, i was brilliant this morning. i meant to say that the user who just wants to browse the web and listen to music would probably be happiest _with an iPhone_. with that bit of info, my earlier post just might make a bit more sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, i was brilliant this morning. i meant to say that the user who just wants to browse the web and listen to music would probably be happiest _with an iPhone_. with that bit of info, my earlier post just might make a bit more sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supernova_hq</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45248</link>
		<dc:creator>supernova_hq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45248</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you get a Nokia NSeries, you can run maemo on it. The N810 has it by default and possibly the N800. If it&#039;s not there by default, everything right down to the N770 will run it if you install it yourself. In fact, not only do they not try to stop you, they post instructions on how to do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you get a Nokia NSeries, you can run maemo on it. The N810 has it by default and possibly the N800. If it&#8217;s not there by default, everything right down to the N770 will run it if you install it yourself. In fact, not only do they not try to stop you, they post instructions on how to do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbot</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45231</link>
		<dc:creator>jbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45231</guid>
		<description>How can you possibly say one OS is better than another? Really, I am a believer in &quot;it depends&quot;.

Windows mobile and blackberry seem to have clunkier interfaces, and the user who just wants to browse the web and listen to music would probably be happiest.

Compare that to the needs/wants of a hacker. I know I personally would want something that doesn&#039;t require a ton of work to customize. palmos and windows mobile are probably the most customizable, in that order. Least convoluted, anyway.

Don&#039;t call out a bias, then show one yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you possibly say one OS is better than another? Really, I am a believer in &#8220;it depends&#8221;.</p>
<p>Windows mobile and blackberry seem to have clunkier interfaces, and the user who just wants to browse the web and listen to music would probably be happiest.</p>
<p>Compare that to the needs/wants of a hacker. I know I personally would want something that doesn&#8217;t require a ton of work to customize. palmos and windows mobile are probably the most customizable, in that order. Least convoluted, anyway.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t call out a bias, then show one yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogy Bee</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogy Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45221</guid>
		<description>Dude, that&#039;s Gizmodo, can you say: &#039;biased&#039;?

1 - windows mobile
2 - android ( taking up winmo&#039;s position as soon as it spreads and matures a bit )
3 - iphone
4 - symbian
5 - crackberry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that&#8217;s Gizmodo, can you say: &#8216;biased&#8217;?</p>
<p>1 &#8211; windows mobile<br />
2 &#8211; android ( taking up winmo&#8217;s position as soon as it spreads and matures a bit )<br />
3 &#8211; iphone<br />
4 &#8211; symbian<br />
5 &#8211; crackberry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45218</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45218</guid>
		<description>i hope android is the one that opens up the mobile web once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope android is the one that opens up the mobile web once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45217</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45217</guid>
		<description>If you call the blackberry by RIM &quot;completely closed and proprietary&quot; (which it is) you should say the same about the iPhone. The blackberry, through it&#039;s j2me support, is actually more open than the iPhone (at least you don&#039;t need to sign an NDA to develop software for it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you call the blackberry by RIM &#8220;completely closed and proprietary&#8221; (which it is) you should say the same about the iPhone. The blackberry, through it&#8217;s j2me support, is actually more open than the iPhone (at least you don&#8217;t need to sign an NDA to develop software for it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonlit</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/09/gizmodos-guide-to-smartphone-oses/comment-page-1/#comment-45208</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonlit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4579#comment-45208</guid>
		<description>In a similar vein, here&#039;s a roundup of emulators of those particular OSs - enjoy! http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10083</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a similar vein, here&#8217;s a roundup of emulators of those particular OSs &#8211; enjoy! <a href="http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10083" rel="nofollow">http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10083</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
