<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Default password network scanning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a2a_cracked</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-82930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a2a_cracked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-82930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[singh_is_king ... contact me... i hav done it... lets see how can we work together...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>singh_is_king &#8230; contact me&#8230; i hav done it&#8230; lets see how can we work together&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singh_is king</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-72044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[singh_is king]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-72044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[want to hack www.agarwal2agarwal.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>want to hack <a href="http://www.agarwal2agarwal.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.agarwal2agarwal.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chieflers</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-48063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chieflers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-48063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I would say truth, if they were close enough to plug in a cable to your router you might have a bigger problem&#039;s then the would be intruder stealing the info on your network.  I would be more worried about them stealing your network. LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I would say truth, if they were close enough to plug in a cable to your router you might have a bigger problem&#8217;s then the would be intruder stealing the info on your network.  I would be more worried about them stealing your network. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-47028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-47028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, beamish, you can connect to routers using this amazing invention known as cables - so you in fact do not always need the WPA\WEP key.

it seems like _ALL_ the posters have no clue - keep using those scripts, kiddies!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, beamish, you can connect to routers using this amazing invention known as cables &#8211; so you in fact do not always need the WPA\WEP key.</p>
<p>it seems like _ALL_ the posters have no clue &#8211; keep using those scripts, kiddies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beamish</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beamish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, ross, you&#039;d have to break the 64 letters long wpa2 key in order to get to the router, so although it&#039;s not a good idea to leave the router unprotected, it&#039;s hardly a serious issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, ross, you&#8217;d have to break the 64 letters long wpa2 key in order to get to the router, so although it&#8217;s not a good idea to leave the router unprotected, it&#8217;s hardly a serious issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tunamurray</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tunamurray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[quick add tr34kepOf&#039;s password to the list!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quick add tr34kepOf&#8217;s password to the list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[people should do this on their home networks too. soooo many people dont secure their wifi fully. they put a WPA2 key on it, thats 64 letters long, but forget to password protect the routers software. put the ip address of the router in, tpye admin and password, and your free to change all the settings you like]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people should do this on their home networks too. soooo many people dont secure their wifi fully. they put a WPA2 key on it, thats 64 letters long, but forget to password protect the routers software. put the ip address of the router in, tpye admin and password, and your free to change all the settings you like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freak3dot</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freak3dot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: pa55w0rd

I once used d455w0rp for a password.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: pa55w0rd</p>
<p>I once used d455w0rp for a password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath Jones</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heath Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if anyone else has made this observation, but there seems to be a trend that a large number of people will take a word like &#039;password&#039;, turn it into pa55w0rd and be happy that the result is secure. I&#039;ve just noticed more and more that this is a common thing for non-IT (non-security-conscious) people to do.. Could be a good start for a wordlist anyhow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone else has made this observation, but there seems to be a trend that a large number of people will take a word like &#8216;password&#8217;, turn it into pa55w0rd and be happy that the result is secure. I&#8217;ve just noticed more and more that this is a common thing for non-IT (non-security-conscious) people to do.. Could be a good start for a wordlist anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dictionary password attacking uses a pre-populated list of possible passwords. Usually those found in a dictionary and that are common words that aren&#039;t spelled funky (i.e. &quot;@pple&quot;).

Brute force tries every combination from a-z and can try variations of words. This can also be taken from a list but most security scanners will just do variations of common words (i.e. &quot;apple&quot;, &quot;@pple&quot;, &quot;appl3&quot;, etc.) 

Hybrid pw attacks are a combination of the above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dictionary password attacking uses a pre-populated list of possible passwords. Usually those found in a dictionary and that are common words that aren&#8217;t spelled funky (i.e. &#8220;@pple&#8221;).</p>
<p>Brute force tries every combination from a-z and can try variations of words. This can also be taken from a list but most security scanners will just do variations of common words (i.e. &#8220;apple&#8221;, &#8220;@pple&#8221;, &#8220;appl3&#8243;, etc.) </p>
<p>Hybrid pw attacks are a combination of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dontknowmuch</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dontknowmuch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was under the impression that a brute force attack was anything that wasn&#039;t trying to just bypass the password.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that a brute force attack was anything that wasn&#8217;t trying to just bypass the password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldenGoblin</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoldenGoblin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it was gonna be  wardriving depant but alas...

Still nice utilites... thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was gonna be  wardriving depant but alas&#8230;</p>
<p>Still nice utilites&#8230; thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antiver</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antiver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[isn&#039;t a dictionary attack just a specific type of brute force attack?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t a dictionary attack just a specific type of brute force attack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yaleman</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yaleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s more of a dictionary attack than a brute force, but it&#039;s a cute looking tool nonetheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more of a dictionary attack than a brute force, but it&#8217;s a cute looking tool nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cde</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/13/default-password-network-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-45563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4756#comment-45563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brute Force != Password list

Brute Force = a, aa, ab, ac .. c, ca, cb ... hell, helm, heln, etc...

Password List = user, name, username, etc, as the list dictates.

If hello isn&#039;t on the list, hello won&#039;t be used at all. In brute force, hello will be used, eventually, as every combination of alphanumeric characters of x length are tried.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brute Force != Password list</p>
<p>Brute Force = a, aa, ab, ac .. c, ca, cb &#8230; hell, helm, heln, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Password List = user, name, username, etc, as the list dictates.</p>
<p>If hello isn&#8217;t on the list, hello won&#8217;t be used at all. In brute force, hello will be used, eventually, as every combination of alphanumeric characters of x length are tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

