<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parts: Chip sockets for dual in-line package (DIP)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mihai MATEI</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-48014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai MATEI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-48014</guid>
		<description>As others said too, the sockets illustrated in the above picture are the worst type. Best ones, with rows of holes (gold or silver), named by others &quot;expensive ones&quot; are named AUGAT (google for augat sockets)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others said too, the sockets illustrated in the above picture are the worst type. Best ones, with rows of holes (gold or silver), named by others &#8220;expensive ones&#8221; are named AUGAT (google for augat sockets)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheKhakinator</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46841</link>
		<dc:creator>TheKhakinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46841</guid>
		<description>All the ICs in the pic are the terrible wiper-contact sockets. I like those expensive ones with the rows of holes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the ICs in the pic are the terrible wiper-contact sockets. I like those expensive ones with the rows of holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46779</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46779</guid>
		<description>I do appreciate the parts articles over the past few weeks.  I think it&#039;s a fantastic idea that brings up some very fundamental issues.

However, my one complaint about the parts articles has to do with the follow-through, that they don&#039;t go quite deep enough into the given topic.  For instance, on this post it would have been very nice in this article to mention the difference between machine pin sockets and the spring-action sockets pictured above.  It would have been nice to at least mention zero-input force (ZIF) sockets for applications where easy extraction is much more important than board space.  It might have even been worthwhile to mention something about more complex sockets for higher pin count chips, and I could probably ramble on.

I have similar criticisms of the stereo jack article, the microSD card article, etc.  I think that the LM317 article had the best background information (or at least links to helpful calculators, etc).

I think you guys are doing a very good thing by including these parts articles as a reoccurring type.  However, I think you could improve them greatly by adding a little more substance (background, implementation, schematics, links to sample code or projects, etc).

~ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do appreciate the parts articles over the past few weeks.  I think it&#8217;s a fantastic idea that brings up some very fundamental issues.</p>
<p>However, my one complaint about the parts articles has to do with the follow-through, that they don&#8217;t go quite deep enough into the given topic.  For instance, on this post it would have been very nice in this article to mention the difference between machine pin sockets and the spring-action sockets pictured above.  It would have been nice to at least mention zero-input force (ZIF) sockets for applications where easy extraction is much more important than board space.  It might have even been worthwhile to mention something about more complex sockets for higher pin count chips, and I could probably ramble on.</p>
<p>I have similar criticisms of the stereo jack article, the microSD card article, etc.  I think that the LM317 article had the best background information (or at least links to helpful calculators, etc).</p>
<p>I think you guys are doing a very good thing by including these parts articles as a reoccurring type.  However, I think you could improve them greatly by adding a little more substance (background, implementation, schematics, links to sample code or projects, etc).</p>
<p>~ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mem.namefix</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46722</link>
		<dc:creator>mem.namefix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46722</guid>
		<description>Is hackaday turning into an online shopping network ?
Id just like to say, these parts are way overpriced.

$0.41 for a 40pin socket at mouser
or
$0.18 for the same at www.futurlec.com.au</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is hackaday turning into an online shopping network ?<br />
Id just like to say, these parts are way overpriced.</p>
<p>$0.41 for a 40pin socket at mouser<br />
or<br />
$0.18 for the same at <a href="http://www.futurlec.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.futurlec.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Alexander</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46695</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46695</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind though these sockets wear out, and things like comparators and op-amps and other analog parts that are very sensitive to signal inputs can give you faulty responses after a few too many uses.
-Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind though these sockets wear out, and things like comparators and op-amps and other analog parts that are very sensitive to signal inputs can give you faulty responses after a few too many uses.<br />
-Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ty johnson</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46692</link>
		<dc:creator>ty johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46692</guid>
		<description>or enabling the autosave frature in openoffice :)

Anyway, these are a must for 40 pin micros like the PIC, (definately dont want to waste solder wick on one of those). especially  if you don&#039;t have icsp like me and my cheap self built one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or enabling the autosave frature in openoffice :)</p>
<p>Anyway, these are a must for 40 pin micros like the PIC, (definately dont want to waste solder wick on one of those). especially  if you don&#8217;t have icsp like me and my cheap self built one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurf</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46672</link>
		<dc:creator>kurf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46672</guid>
		<description>Sockets are an absolute must for any prototype application. Don&#039;t cause yourself more problems then necessary. Using sockets is like saving often in Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sockets are an absolute must for any prototype application. Don&#8217;t cause yourself more problems then necessary. Using sockets is like saving often in Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46664</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46664</guid>
		<description>I like single inline sockets (ex Digikey pn: ED7064-ND).  Just cut off the number of pins you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like single inline sockets (ex Digikey pn: ED7064-ND).  Just cut off the number of pins you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Y</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46659</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46659</guid>
		<description>I never solder ICs directly; sockets are great, plus for the home-brewer, it allows room for mistakes - just pull and replace the IC.

For building programmer boards, I can&#039;t find ZIF sockets locally and the usual suppliers seem a bit expensive. For a good resource, Chinese vendors sell on eBay and I&#039;ve had good results. I can get 6 or 8 ZIF sockets delivered from Hong Kong to Texas in about 8 or 9 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never solder ICs directly; sockets are great, plus for the home-brewer, it allows room for mistakes &#8211; just pull and replace the IC.</p>
<p>For building programmer boards, I can&#8217;t find ZIF sockets locally and the usual suppliers seem a bit expensive. For a good resource, Chinese vendors sell on eBay and I&#8217;ve had good results. I can get 6 or 8 ZIF sockets delivered from Hong Kong to Texas in about 8 or 9 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borgie</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46655</link>
		<dc:creator>borgie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46655</guid>
		<description>Just want to say I really dig these posts on parts.  The comments are as insightful as the original posts.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to say I really dig these posts on parts.  The comments are as insightful as the original posts.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46653</guid>
		<description>the expensive kind of socket comes very handy for homemade double-sided PCBs, because you can solder under them. there is some space between the frame and the board surface where the socket pins are reachable with a soldering iron. When you have to make via connections under IC pins, this is an elegant way to do it.

Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the expensive kind of socket comes very handy for homemade double-sided PCBs, because you can solder under them. there is some space between the frame and the board surface where the socket pins are reachable with a soldering iron. When you have to make via connections under IC pins, this is an elegant way to do it.</p>
<p>Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46652</guid>
		<description>If you have to remove an ic often, for example when you&#039;re programming a microcontroller without using iscp, get two sockets of the expensive kind, place one on the pcb and place the ic in the other.

This makes removing the ic from the pcb much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to remove an ic often, for example when you&#8217;re programming a microcontroller without using iscp, get two sockets of the expensive kind, place one on the pcb and place the ic in the other.</p>
<p>This makes removing the ic from the pcb much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/10/20/parts-chip-sockets-for-dual-in-line-package-dip/comment-page-1/#comment-46650</link>
		<dc:creator>pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=4974#comment-46650</guid>
		<description>I always buy whatever size (14-28) surplus sockets I can find, and if I need a size I don&#039;t have laying around I&#039;ll cut rows off two sockets until I have the size I need.  It might be a bit wasteful, but the sockets I buy are usually production run surplus anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always buy whatever size (14-28) surplus sockets I can find, and if I need a size I don&#8217;t have laying around I&#8217;ll cut rows off two sockets until I have the size I need.  It might be a bit wasteful, but the sockets I buy are usually production run surplus anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
