<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple PWM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:18:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlton</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carlton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bob: pulse-frequency modulation (pfm) is really only good for low current applications, where switching losses are significant; typically, conduction (and other) losses dominant at higher currents.

additionally, pfm can make emi more difficult to mitigate (at undetermined or over a wide frequency range); at higher currents the emi peaks are even higher, again a reason to (often) avoid pfm at higher currents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bob: pulse-frequency modulation (pfm) is really only good for low current applications, where switching losses are significant; typically, conduction (and other) losses dominant at higher currents.</p>
<p>additionally, pfm can make emi more difficult to mitigate (at undetermined or over a wide frequency range); at higher currents the emi peaks are even higher, again a reason to (often) avoid pfm at higher currents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[changing cap is good enough, thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>changing cap is good enough, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biozz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[biozz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sol &amp; @therian:
the 100k gives you the fill sweep to change the frequency the best way is the cap at pin 2 102 makes it switch faster and 104 switches slower]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sol &amp; @therian:<br />
the 100k gives you the fill sweep to change the frequency the best way is the cap at pin 2 102 makes it switch faster and 104 switches slower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@therian:
In this circuit the frequency is controlled by the capacitor connected to pin 2, I think. I don&#039;t think you can change the frequency by changing resistance in this case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@therian:<br />
In this circuit the frequency is controlled by the capacitor connected to pin 2, I think. I don&#8217;t think you can change the frequency by changing resistance in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is there a way to add another pot to control frequency also ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a way to add another pot to control frequency also ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this. So many projects use microcontrollers as overkill when a 555 timer will do the job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this. So many projects use microcontrollers as overkill when a 555 timer will do the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeracy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xeracy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How timely. I was just digging through my box of junk and found a LED product demo that has 3 faders and a pic controller to mix RGB on 3-color LEDs. I hooked the leads up to the Heath Kit (1962) Oscilloscope I just nabbed off craigslist last week (for $20) and low and behold, it uses PWM to dim each colored LED.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How timely. I was just digging through my box of junk and found a LED product demo that has 3 faders and a pic controller to mix RGB on 3-color LEDs. I hooked the leads up to the Heath Kit (1962) Oscilloscope I just nabbed off craigslist last week (for $20) and low and behold, it uses PWM to dim each colored LED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A less common technique is pulse frequency modulation, which can be found in very efficient and low power switching power supplies. It lowers the switching losses in certain situations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A less common technique is pulse frequency modulation, which can be found in very efficient and low power switching power supplies. It lowers the switching losses in certain situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-parrot</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ex-parrot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[huzzah. afrotech slowly consumes the internet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huzzah. afrotech slowly consumes the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmythecow</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmythecow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[afroman does it again!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>afroman does it again!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James P. Wack</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James P. Wack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the diode part is awesome!

But now, the most of the pots out there are not precise enought for these use, maybe adding a resistor at each end could be very neat for cheapass servo control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the diode part is awesome!</p>
<p>But now, the most of the pots out there are not precise enought for these use, maybe adding a resistor at each end could be very neat for cheapass servo control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biozz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/16/simple-pwm/comment-page-1/#comment-51068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[biozz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5950#comment-51068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[personally i have used this for quite some time now. it is quite reliable for some applications but is not to accurate if your controlling the pwm with anything but a resistor (or a pot) also i have been told its easier just to adjust pin 5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally i have used this for quite some time now. it is quite reliable for some applications but is not to accurate if your controlling the pwm with anything but a resistor (or a pot) also i have been told its easier just to adjust pin 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

