<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honeycomb tire won&#8217;t go flat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ziemines padangos</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-96039</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziemines padangos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-96039</guid>
		<description>Nice post. By the way i heard that in 2010 michelin plans to make some supper tires. Which saves energy and valid longer time then nowday tires, and this tires will be perfect for electorcars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. By the way i heard that in 2010 michelin plans to make some supper tires. Which saves energy and valid longer time then nowday tires, and this tires will be perfect for electorcars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holbik wolff</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-78514</link>
		<dc:creator>holbik wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-78514</guid>
		<description>Though it is true that the &quot;tweel&quot; was affected by the force of the car over time and that this could become semiperminant or perminant, it wont happen. Why? These aren&#039;t really meant for everyday people&#039;s cars. They are meant for professional racers / military vehicles where they are used almost constantly, and also on small vehicles like motorcycles and wheelchairs where the load is not heavy enough to cause a perminant or semiperminant dent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though it is true that the &#8220;tweel&#8221; was affected by the force of the car over time and that this could become semiperminant or perminant, it wont happen. Why? These aren&#8217;t really meant for everyday people&#8217;s cars. They are meant for professional racers / military vehicles where they are used almost constantly, and also on small vehicles like motorcycles and wheelchairs where the load is not heavy enough to cause a perminant or semiperminant dent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thruddirico</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-55462</link>
		<dc:creator>Thruddirico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-55462</guid>
		<description>With the question of the open cells causing all sorts of auditory mayhem I have a possible solution.

Instead of solid elastomer covers why not use closed cell foam inserts as plugs for the cells. The nominal pneumatic pressure should not add to much of an effect. as an added bonus, if a cell plug blows out from normal use the whole wheel would not be compromised.

The cells blowing out from interaction with an IED would be the least of your worries when dealing with the aftereffects of an IED..

The possible cool factor for civilian use would be using translucence / transparent materials for the plugs and light sources embedded into the plugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the question of the open cells causing all sorts of auditory mayhem I have a possible solution.</p>
<p>Instead of solid elastomer covers why not use closed cell foam inserts as plugs for the cells. The nominal pneumatic pressure should not add to much of an effect. as an added bonus, if a cell plug blows out from normal use the whole wheel would not be compromised.</p>
<p>The cells blowing out from interaction with an IED would be the least of your worries when dealing with the aftereffects of an IED..</p>
<p>The possible cool factor for civilian use would be using translucence / transparent materials for the plugs and light sources embedded into the plugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventor</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-55241</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-55241</guid>
		<description>Surely everyone has seen the latest &#039;low profile&#039; wheels. A 24&quot; rim with barely an inch of rubber looks much like the Tweel [depending on rim design]. 
A wall solves the problem of liquids and solids invading the tyre space, but makes a problem due to trapped air. The rims would need a filtered valve to equalize the internal pressure.
The Honeycomb Wheel does look cool tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely everyone has seen the latest &#8216;low profile&#8217; wheels. A 24&#8243; rim with barely an inch of rubber looks much like the Tweel [depending on rim design].<br />
A wall solves the problem of liquids and solids invading the tyre space, but makes a problem due to trapped air. The rims would need a filtered valve to equalize the internal pressure.<br />
The Honeycomb Wheel does look cool tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sargun</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-54279</link>
		<dc:creator>Sargun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-54279</guid>
		<description>You could probably cover the sides in some sort of doughnut material with a high amount of elasticity. It&#039;d significantly increase the size of the wheel, and break the aerodynamics, but you would still get the same movement in the wheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could probably cover the sides in some sort of doughnut material with a high amount of elasticity. It&#8217;d significantly increase the size of the wheel, and break the aerodynamics, but you would still get the same movement in the wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjaminvallen1</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-53580</link>
		<dc:creator>benjaminvallen1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-53580</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t wait to see it on our humvees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t wait to see it on our humvees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: administrator1</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-53096</link>
		<dc:creator>administrator1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-53096</guid>
		<description>The only question I have, other than where can I get a set, is how do these twheels adhere to the rim?  Looks as if you&#039;d have to have a two-part rim or something.  With any horsepower, it looks like the seal could be broken easily and the rim would spin inside the twheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only question I have, other than where can I get a set, is how do these twheels adhere to the rim?  Looks as if you&#8217;d have to have a two-part rim or something.  With any horsepower, it looks like the seal could be broken easily and the rim would spin inside the twheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-52993</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-52993</guid>
		<description>I am barack obama and I approve this article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am barack obama and I approve this article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaserJesus</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-51939</link>
		<dc:creator>LaserJesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51939</guid>
		<description>I have a great idea for this - what if they put rubber sidewalls on it, took the structure out of it and then filled it with some sort of pressurized gas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a great idea for this &#8211; what if they put rubber sidewalls on it, took the structure out of it and then filled it with some sort of pressurized gas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-51492</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51492</guid>
		<description>davido is right, so is insipid melon and mike. i am too a mechanical/electrical engineer and both terms and arguments are both theoretically sound. The one thing i would like to see is how well they take pot holes, speed bumps, small mammals, and other debris without damaging the honeycomb structure at low speed and high speed. A good number of pneumatic tires will blow out if you hit a good sized pot hole above 40, *happened to me*, id like to know if these bad boys could handle a decent sized pot hole at high speed without severe consequences so i could continue to drive where i want and how i want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>davido is right, so is insipid melon and mike. i am too a mechanical/electrical engineer and both terms and arguments are both theoretically sound. The one thing i would like to see is how well they take pot holes, speed bumps, small mammals, and other debris without damaging the honeycomb structure at low speed and high speed. A good number of pneumatic tires will blow out if you hit a good sized pot hole above 40, *happened to me*, id like to know if these bad boys could handle a decent sized pot hole at high speed without severe consequences so i could continue to drive where i want and how i want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-2/#comment-51485</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51485</guid>
		<description>In defense of davido, I think all he was getting at, is that the term &quot;traction&quot; wasn&#039;t entirely accurate.

It stands to reason that deflating tires is going to give you an advantage off road, because of the increased contact area and ability to contour, even if the total friction is unchanged.

As for tanks, I think beyond a larger contact area, a tread gives you the ability to &quot;bridge&quot; irregularity in rough terrain, as well as reducing overall pressure exerted by gigantic heavily armored vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense of davido, I think all he was getting at, is that the term &#8220;traction&#8221; wasn&#8217;t entirely accurate.</p>
<p>It stands to reason that deflating tires is going to give you an advantage off road, because of the increased contact area and ability to contour, even if the total friction is unchanged.</p>
<p>As for tanks, I think beyond a larger contact area, a tread gives you the ability to &#8220;bridge&#8221; irregularity in rough terrain, as well as reducing overall pressure exerted by gigantic heavily armored vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agentxq49</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-51461</link>
		<dc:creator>agentxq49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51461</guid>
		<description>Well, they can just use the same material and make a weblike structure over it. Besides, even if a rock went in, it shouldnt do any damage to the twheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they can just use the same material and make a weblike structure over it. Besides, even if a rock went in, it shouldnt do any damage to the twheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRad</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-51368</link>
		<dc:creator>JRad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51368</guid>
		<description>You could insert light foam in the gaps to prevent rocks and grit getting in, and since it&#039;s light, it&#039;d have no extra impact on the structure of the wheel.

You&#039;d probably have to glue it in, and watch out for vandals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could insert light foam in the gaps to prevent rocks and grit getting in, and since it&#8217;s light, it&#8217;d have no extra impact on the structure of the wheel.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d probably have to glue it in, and watch out for vandals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insipid Melon</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-51301</link>
		<dc:creator>Insipid Melon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51301</guid>
		<description>Davido, simple intuition should demonstrate to you that your model is not realistic.  What is the purpose of using continuous tracks on vehicles such as tanks?  Is it not precisely because of their larger contact area?

The primary problem with off-roading is that you *do not have a fixed surface.*  That means that everything you learned in physics 101 about coefficients of kinetic friction, etc., goes straight out the window.

Frequently, when you apply too much lateral force and not enough normal force, you end up propelling the surface instead of the vehicle.  Furthermore, because the surface is deformable, you often rely treads on digging in and creating an interlocking substrate with the surface, rather than simple friction between the surface of the ground and the surface of the tire.  

Your deduction is only valid for smooth, fixed surfaces.  (and even then the event of significant heat transfer during braking can obliterate the expected coefficient of friction if there is not enough contact distribution)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davido, simple intuition should demonstrate to you that your model is not realistic.  What is the purpose of using continuous tracks on vehicles such as tanks?  Is it not precisely because of their larger contact area?</p>
<p>The primary problem with off-roading is that you *do not have a fixed surface.*  That means that everything you learned in physics 101 about coefficients of kinetic friction, etc., goes straight out the window.</p>
<p>Frequently, when you apply too much lateral force and not enough normal force, you end up propelling the surface instead of the vehicle.  Furthermore, because the surface is deformable, you often rely treads on digging in and creating an interlocking substrate with the surface, rather than simple friction between the surface of the ground and the surface of the tire.  </p>
<p>Your deduction is only valid for smooth, fixed surfaces.  (and even then the event of significant heat transfer during braking can obliterate the expected coefficient of friction if there is not enough contact distribution)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man On Fire</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/17/honeycomb-tire-wont-go-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-51290</link>
		<dc:creator>Man On Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=5966#comment-51290</guid>
		<description>I heard about these a few years ago, and they were having problems with air going through the honeycomb, and resonating like a musical instrument when it got to certain speeds. made them noisy as hell, and increased vibration. I&#039;m sure they&#039;ve fixed the problem though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about these a few years ago, and they were having problems with air going through the honeycomb, and resonating like a musical instrument when it got to certain speeds. made them noisy as hell, and increased vibration. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ve fixed the problem though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
