<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faster browsing with RAM disks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: klancy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-3/#comment-100261</link>
		<dc:creator>klancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-100261</guid>
		<description>Hold the boat man... all these people screaming &quot;STUPID&quot; and &quot;LAME&quot; aren&#039;t even considering that any program you run... (pretty much ANY)... during the ENTIRE time that you&#039;re running it, is going to run better if it&#039;s on a ramdrive.

Now what is an OS? It&#039;s a program.

Consider the Windows Vista can be sped up by providing a thumb drive for cache. That&#039;s not a hack, but a FEATURE of the OS. Hmm, why and how?

Well... stuff is faster in RAM. Period. Naysayers, your arguments are uneducated and ill informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold the boat man&#8230; all these people screaming &#8220;STUPID&#8221; and &#8220;LAME&#8221; aren&#8217;t even considering that any program you run&#8230; (pretty much ANY)&#8230; during the ENTIRE time that you&#8217;re running it, is going to run better if it&#8217;s on a ramdrive.</p>
<p>Now what is an OS? It&#8217;s a program.</p>
<p>Consider the Windows Vista can be sped up by providing a thumb drive for cache. That&#8217;s not a hack, but a FEATURE of the OS. Hmm, why and how?</p>
<p>Well&#8230; stuff is faster in RAM. Period. Naysayers, your arguments are uneducated and ill informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oren Beck</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-3/#comment-92364</link>
		<dc:creator>Oren Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-92364</guid>
		<description>Puppy can be set to eliminate Flash Writes during a session unless they are requested during a session or upon exit. If you have no need to &quot;save locally?&quot; That session in theory uses *zero* flash writes.

IF you can live with the risk about work in progress losses? Mitigation&#039;s possible. Look no further than Gmail for a conceptual answer. A Gmail session &quot;autosaves&quot; drafts at intervals.

So,for netbooks with internal WLAN or any &quot;connected&quot; machines it&#039;s potentially a done deal.By a use of remote caching/s. Oh, you &quot;can&quot; write back to the local flash on exit if you want to .. But Why would you do so for 99% of your session&#039;s data when it&#039;s only 1% likely needing local saves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puppy can be set to eliminate Flash Writes during a session unless they are requested during a session or upon exit. If you have no need to &#8220;save locally?&#8221; That session in theory uses *zero* flash writes.</p>
<p>IF you can live with the risk about work in progress losses? Mitigation&#8217;s possible. Look no further than Gmail for a conceptual answer. A Gmail session &#8220;autosaves&#8221; drafts at intervals.</p>
<p>So,for netbooks with internal WLAN or any &#8220;connected&#8221; machines it&#8217;s potentially a done deal.By a use of remote caching/s. Oh, you &#8220;can&#8221; write back to the local flash on exit if you want to .. But Why would you do so for 99% of your session&#8217;s data when it&#8217;s only 1% likely needing local saves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-72445</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-72445</guid>
		<description>This made me think... here is an opportunity for OS innovation:
OSes should have some native support to go all out for performance.
For this topic, an OS would allow programs to create folders with a special type &quot;cache folder&quot; and a maximum size for it.
This would allow the OS to create a RAMdrive with enough size for all those caches.
Windows 7 is coming soon, it would be interesting to have such a thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This made me think&#8230; here is an opportunity for OS innovation:<br />
OSes should have some native support to go all out for performance.<br />
For this topic, an OS would allow programs to create folders with a special type &#8220;cache folder&#8221; and a maximum size for it.<br />
This would allow the OS to create a RAMdrive with enough size for all those caches.<br />
Windows 7 is coming soon, it would be interesting to have such a thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shohug</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-56628</link>
		<dc:creator>shohug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-56628</guid>
		<description>please help me to change the cache directory of safari to ramdisk in WINDOWS XP. i have a free software which can create upto 3GB ramdisk in XP. if u still need this then contact &quot;Shohug_0301012@yahoo.com&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please help me to change the cache directory of safari to ramdisk in WINDOWS XP. i have a free software which can create upto 3GB ramdisk in XP. if u still need this then contact &#8220;Shohug_0301012@yahoo.com&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Head Asplode</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-56408</link>
		<dc:creator>My Head Asplode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-56408</guid>
		<description>Ok, srsly.
All the fags talking about &quot;copying OS to a ramdrive&quot; are out of your mind retarted!

RAM drives are whipped clean every time you restart your computer.

If you moved all your OS8 files to a ramdisk, you&#039;d have no OS.

You can&#039;t ever EVER boot from a RAM disk. NEVER NEVER NEVER!

In theory, you could load all the system files to RAM at startup, then boot the system from that, but think about that for about ten seconds and you&#039;ll realize why that&#039;s a stupid redundant idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, srsly.<br />
All the fags talking about &#8220;copying OS to a ramdrive&#8221; are out of your mind retarted!</p>
<p>RAM drives are whipped clean every time you restart your computer.</p>
<p>If you moved all your OS8 files to a ramdisk, you&#8217;d have no OS.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ever EVER boot from a RAM disk. NEVER NEVER NEVER!</p>
<p>In theory, you could load all the system files to RAM at startup, then boot the system from that, but think about that for about ten seconds and you&#8217;ll realize why that&#8217;s a stupid redundant idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poky</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-56033</link>
		<dc:creator>poky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-56033</guid>
		<description>http://tinyurl.com/ramdrive
easy solution for windows : )
been using it for certain programs, last 18 months, which requier high i/o speeds : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ramdrive" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ramdrive</a><br />
easy solution for windows : )<br />
been using it for certain programs, last 18 months, which requier high i/o speeds : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-55830</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-55830</guid>
		<description>you can reach me through this id: torazio_torino@yahoo.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can reach me through this id: <a href="mailto:torazio_torino@yahoo.co.uk">torazio_torino@yahoo.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-55829</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-55829</guid>
		<description>hey bro i sell cvv, fullz, tracks and wutf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey bro i sell cvv, fullz, tracks and wutf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just4Kix</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53718</link>
		<dc:creator>Just4Kix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53718</guid>
		<description>update on the Firefox not opening issue. If you make the RamDisk invisible, add a . in front of the ram disk name. Example:

$ rm -r ~/library/caches/firefox

$mkdir /volumes/.ramdisk/firefox\ \(\cache\)

$ ln -s /volumes/.ramdisk/firefox\ \(\cache\) ~/library/caches/firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update on the Firefox not opening issue. If you make the RamDisk invisible, add a . in front of the ram disk name. Example:</p>
<p>$ rm -r ~/library/caches/firefox</p>
<p>$mkdir /volumes/.ramdisk/firefox\ \(\cache\)</p>
<p>$ ln -s /volumes/.ramdisk/firefox\ \(\cache\) ~/library/caches/firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SneakyWho_am_i</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53666</link>
		<dc:creator>SneakyWho_am_i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53666</guid>
		<description>Caching desktop applications in RAM... Hmmm, it never occurred to me that my software wasn&#039;t already caching properly.

I do normally use this for hacks I do for little web apps (amateur things though they are) ... If I have to set and get little bits of data I will often shove them somewhere in /dev/shm (normally don&#039;t bother to consider Windows boxes)

but, hmmm, now I&#039;m thinking &quot;I wonder if I can do that in Windows without paying a smallhuge fee!&quot; ... I used to have some freeware lying around which let me create a ramdisk. It was awesome but I only had 32MB of RAM and soon gave that b ack to my applications to use as .... as..... well, to use the RAM as RAM. Tada!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caching desktop applications in RAM&#8230; Hmmm, it never occurred to me that my software wasn&#8217;t already caching properly.</p>
<p>I do normally use this for hacks I do for little web apps (amateur things though they are) &#8230; If I have to set and get little bits of data I will often shove them somewhere in /dev/shm (normally don&#8217;t bother to consider Windows boxes)</p>
<p>but, hmmm, now I&#8217;m thinking &#8220;I wonder if I can do that in Windows without paying a smallhuge fee!&#8221; &#8230; I used to have some freeware lying around which let me create a ramdisk. It was awesome but I only had 32MB of RAM and soon gave that b ack to my applications to use as &#8230;. as&#8230;.. well, to use the RAM as RAM. Tada!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chamunks</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53515</link>
		<dc:creator>chamunks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53515</guid>
		<description>WEEEEEE! RAM Harddrives  http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hyperos-dram-hard-drive-block,1186.html

I realize capslock is disabled but at least it looks annoying and attention grabbing in my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WEEEEEE! RAM Harddrives  <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hyperos-dram-hard-drive-block,1186.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hyperos-dram-hard-drive-block,1186.html</a></p>
<p>I realize capslock is disabled but at least it looks annoying and attention grabbing in my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just4Kix</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53436</link>
		<dc:creator>Just4Kix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53436</guid>
		<description>Thanks g, your terminal script works! I was wondering why Firefox wouldn&#039;t open after running those commands mentioned in the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks g, your terminal script works! I was wondering why Firefox wouldn&#8217;t open after running those commands mentioned in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53037</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53037</guid>
		<description>That is really cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikhil</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-53031</link>
		<dc:creator>nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-53031</guid>
		<description>what other advantages could creating a ramdisk have besides browsing advantages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what other advantages could creating a ramdisk have besides browsing advantages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/20/faster-browsing-with-ram-disks/comment-page-2/#comment-52991</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6143#comment-52991</guid>
		<description>I am barack obama and I approve this article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am barack obama and I approve this article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
