<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNC engraver upgrades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2008/11/21/cnc-engraver-upgrades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/21/cnc-engraver-upgrades/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ribblem</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/21/cnc-engraver-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-52116</link>
		<dc:creator>ribblem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6175#comment-52116</guid>
		<description>Yes Chris.  I do believe that is what Stunmonkey means.

There has been some discussion about this and I can see the advantage of that method.  I get over 3 inches of z travel using my current method and that&#039;s good enough for me.  I I did move the entire z axis rather than just the plate then I&#039;d have 5.5 inches of z travel.

The reasons I don&#039;t use move the whole z axis are:
1) It&#039;s more complicated method since I am currently able to mount the x axis lead nut to the z axis and if I moved the z axis I&#039;d need another plate to handle this.

2) It is theoretically less rigid.  Not sure if this would affect the real world system.

3) 3 inches of z travel is enough for me so I&#039;m just going to follow KISS.  One reason 3 inches is enough is because any router bit that can cut more than 3&quot; is extremely expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Chris.  I do believe that is what Stunmonkey means.</p>
<p>There has been some discussion about this and I can see the advantage of that method.  I get over 3 inches of z travel using my current method and that&#8217;s good enough for me.  I I did move the entire z axis rather than just the plate then I&#8217;d have 5.5 inches of z travel.</p>
<p>The reasons I don&#8217;t use move the whole z axis are:<br />
1) It&#8217;s more complicated method since I am currently able to mount the x axis lead nut to the z axis and if I moved the z axis I&#8217;d need another plate to handle this.</p>
<p>2) It is theoretically less rigid.  Not sure if this would affect the real world system.</p>
<p>3) 3 inches of z travel is enough for me so I&#8217;m just going to follow KISS.  One reason 3 inches is enough is because any router bit that can cut more than 3&#8243; is extremely expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/21/cnc-engraver-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-52006</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6175#comment-52006</guid>
		<description>How is the z backwards? The blocks should be mounted
to the x and the cold-rolled plate and motor should slide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the z backwards? The blocks should be mounted<br />
to the x and the cold-rolled plate and motor should slide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stunmonkey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2008/11/21/cnc-engraver-upgrades/comment-page-1/#comment-51977</link>
		<dc:creator>stunmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadaycom.wordpress.com/?p=6175#comment-51977</guid>
		<description>Cool. You still have the Z axis bolted on backwards, but other than that its looking good! Nice to see its making chips fly, and the results of your cuts so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. You still have the Z axis bolted on backwards, but other than that its looking good! Nice to see its making chips fly, and the results of your cuts so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
