Comments on: Vacuum micromouse

By: Amos

Amos — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:47:18 +0000

Just use a Tesla turbine with a wide gap (and kevlar/carbon fiber composite disks on a titanium shaft, if you have racing team money) and it’ll suck rocks through and keep running.

By: mang

mang — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:39:06 +0000

This is a job for James Dyson. Those cyclonic things don’t have silly filters and don’t lose suction and all the gravel and tire bits collected while driving could be ejected at stoplights or when people tailgate you.

By: RealGene

RealGene — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:47:58 +0000

The Hall Chaparral 2J, introduced in 1970, was the first racer to use suction fans, and was banned from Can-Am racing after protests from other racing teams, particularly McClaren, who then used it themselves for the F1.

Mechanically, these are very problematic as they suck in dirt, rocks, tire chunks, and any other track debris, which tends to wreck the fans.

By: starfight

starfight — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:26:00 +0000

i want a fan like that in my car:-P

By: jb

jb — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:43:36 +0000

That’s cool…. and hilarious when it gets stuck and people scream.

By: attract money

attract money — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:38:57 +0000

great blog

By: pov

pov — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:07:32 +0000

Wasn’t the ban on ground effect based f1 cars introduced after Ayrton Senna crashed exactly because of what @marijn described: a rupture that lead him straight into a wall? I still remember as if it was yesterday the time while I was listening to that GP on radio and they announced he crashed, I couldn’t believe my ears…

By: Jollyg

Jollyg — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:07:56 +0000

The McLaren F1 used fans for extra downforce:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_F1#Aerodynamics

By: xerxesdaphat

xerxesdaphat — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:26:10 +0000

To clarify the banning of fans used in F1; IIRC it was Brabham who introduced the `fan car’ (BT45B). They didn’t outlaw fans as such, there was already a categorical ban on movable aerodynamic devices (there still is in F1 — which is flaunted with the use of deformable surfaces to produce less drag at higher speeds, but more downforce at lower speeds). The fan came under a movable aerodynamic device of course — Brabham claimed it was for engine cooling (lol! The thing was massive). I think they only ran it for a few races before they kicked it out. Won a single GP I think.

The ban on ground effects came a little later.

By: Kender

Kender — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:07:31 +0000

The TV show Crash Lab built one on a trailer for a logging truck to see if it can corner faster with out tipping over. Those are top heavy with all the weight of the logs. It did work but was funny to watch because of the cloud of dust that was blowing up. It was like a giant vacuum cleaner.

By: Marijn

Marijn — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:32:12 +0000

Suction devices were outlawed in racing because, if for whatever reason (bump, piece of tire on the road etc.) the distance between the car and the road increases temporarily, the additional grip will be lost. Since the whole point of the additional grip is to corner faster than what would normally be possible, this would result in a very big crash and possibly the death of the driver, spectators etc.

As far as I know, they are street legal. Although I am not aware of any car which uses a separate fan to achieve additional downforce, there are a number of sports cars that have fan blade shaped wheels to suck air from underneath the car.

Also common in road cars are ground-effect bodies (for example, the Ferrari Enzo). These are also no longer allowed in racing and have a similar effect to an active fan. Compare photos of a Ferrari Enzo and a Maserati MC12 to see the difference between a car designed to take advantage of the ground effect and and a car designed to maximise traditional downforce. Both are based on the same chassis and engine.

By: rasz

rasz — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:58:21 +0000

I imagine you would suck a lot of dirt from the normal road, F1 tracks are clean

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:38:39 +0000

I don’t see why they wouldn’t be street legal. The speeds you could achieve might not be though.

By: Solenoidclock

Solenoidclock — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:36:12 +0000

But are they still street legal, tom?

By: Tony

Tony — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:32:49 +0000

It’s cool to see some maze solver robots, it seems like they sort of lost popularity a while back. I was always interested in how they worked. Very cool.