<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resistive ladder volume control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grish</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-386585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-386585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike,

You need to contact Symbol corporation and make arrangements to pay license fees for their patent, #7,248,195, which you are infringing upon with your rotary-switch and resistors idea.

Yes, it may seem trivial and obvious to a practitioner of the art (in fact, I just reinvented it myself last night, with the exact same circuit layout as the one in the patent, for a little project of mine), but that doesn&#039;t matter to the USPTO.  They want you to challenge the patent in court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>You need to contact Symbol corporation and make arrangements to pay license fees for their patent, #7,248,195, which you are infringing upon with your rotary-switch and resistors idea.</p>
<p>Yes, it may seem trivial and obvious to a practitioner of the art (in fact, I just reinvented it myself last night, with the exact same circuit layout as the one in the patent, for a little project of mine), but that doesn&#8217;t matter to the USPTO.  They want you to challenge the patent in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wai Sartorius</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-129652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wai Sartorius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-129652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to subscribe to your rss feed, but had a difficulty adding it to google reader. Could you please look at this webpage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to subscribe to your rss feed, but had a difficulty adding it to google reader. Could you please look at this webpage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Lagunas</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-129648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorian Lagunas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-129648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please figure out more where can i buy werner ladders cheapest.I needed werner ladders tools.My friend want it this month. :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please figure out more where can i buy werner ladders cheapest.I needed werner ladders tools.My friend want it this month. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-72048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-72048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this comment is a bit late, but I just used this trick a few days ago.  Not for volume, though.  This allowed me to read a six position rotary switch with an AVR using only one analog pin.  The levels returned are very consistent.  I could easily read many more steps than that, but 6 was all that I needed.

Thanks Hack a day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this comment is a bit late, but I just used this trick a few days ago.  Not for volume, though.  This allowed me to read a six position rotary switch with an AVR using only one analog pin.  The levels returned are very consistent.  I could easily read many more steps than that, but 6 was all that I needed.</p>
<p>Thanks Hack a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcg</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-60594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-60594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve used this method before, not for the audio quality (audiophile? more like audidiots) but for the durablity. A cheap rotary switch will last longer then a cheap volumepot. And with well picked steps (not nessasarily logaritmic) it works great.

Don&#039;t dismiss it just because the voodoo audio idiots use it. Judge for yourself if it&#039;s true and if it&#039;s any use for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used this method before, not for the audio quality (audiophile? more like audidiots) but for the durablity. A cheap rotary switch will last longer then a cheap volumepot. And with well picked steps (not nessasarily logaritmic) it works great.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t dismiss it just because the voodoo audio idiots use it. Judge for yourself if it&#8217;s true and if it&#8217;s any use for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orv</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-59082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-59082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad he spent the extra money on low-resistance oxygen-free wire to, uhm, connect up his resistors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad he spent the extra money on low-resistance oxygen-free wire to, uhm, connect up his resistors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[argh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it that hard to mod the comments?  50% useful posts, 50% garbage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it that hard to mod the comments?  50% useful posts, 50% garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[none]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lololololol
you all suck dick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lololololol<br />
you all suck dick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiska</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fiska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who enjoys listening to music, I can appreciate what this accomplishes. Ever adjusted the volume on an old stereo and heard a nasty crackling sound? Dust can get into some pots and make them useless  -- sound will cut out, and crackling is bad for speakers. As well, some stereos have a separate volume pot for each channel.. it makes sense to have each channel set at the same volume -- but then again, people don&#039;t actually sit down and listen to music anymore, do they :)
Just tired of people assuming that anything audio related is snake oil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who enjoys listening to music, I can appreciate what this accomplishes. Ever adjusted the volume on an old stereo and heard a nasty crackling sound? Dust can get into some pots and make them useless  &#8212; sound will cut out, and crackling is bad for speakers. As well, some stereos have a separate volume pot for each channel.. it makes sense to have each channel set at the same volume &#8212; but then again, people don&#8217;t actually sit down and listen to music anymore, do they :)<br />
Just tired of people assuming that anything audio related is snake oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: localroger</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[localroger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ragnar, even if it&#039;s relatively cheap and harmless ofc is one of thsoe things marketed to people who think they can hear a difference which sound physical analysis can prove does not exist, and proper engineering types tend to get bent out of shape that the whole market exists because it is, for the most part, a total scam.  (The difference between an 8 ft and a 10 ft cable, or 12 vs. 14 gauge, is huge compared to the difference between normal copper, ofc, silver, and gold.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ragnar, even if it&#8217;s relatively cheap and harmless ofc is one of thsoe things marketed to people who think they can hear a difference which sound physical analysis can prove does not exist, and proper engineering types tend to get bent out of shape that the whole market exists because it is, for the most part, a total scam.  (The difference between an 8 ft and a 10 ft cable, or 12 vs. 14 gauge, is huge compared to the difference between normal copper, ofc, silver, and gold.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wwhat</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he cares so much then why use a plastic housing with unshielded wires? that&#039;s the weird part to me, I bet its make a good AM receiver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he cares so much then why use a plastic housing with unshielded wires? that&#8217;s the weird part to me, I bet its make a good AM receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VonSkippy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VonSkippy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@njay:  What?  You didn&#039;t notice the 0.0007 percent difference at the low end and the whopping 0.0014 percent difference at the high end?  Audio Noobs - you&#039;re just soooo naive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@njay:  What?  You didn&#8217;t notice the 0.0007 percent difference at the low end and the whopping 0.0014 percent difference at the high end?  Audio Noobs &#8211; you&#8217;re just soooo naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@njay: it&#039;s probably a difference too small to detect.  which begs the question, why does it matter if the two are different if you never notice it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@njay: it&#8217;s probably a difference too small to detect.  which begs the question, why does it matter if the two are different if you never notice it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Njay</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Njay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s strange. I&#039;ve never noticed any noticeable volume difference between 2 channels on any system, not even on 15+ year old walkmans. There must must be something wrong with my ears.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s strange. I&#8217;ve never noticed any noticeable volume difference between 2 channels on any system, not even on 15+ year old walkmans. There must must be something wrong with my ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnar</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/01/10/resistive-ladder-volume-control/comment-page-1/#comment-58609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ragnar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=7719#comment-58609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stereopotentiometers tend to have different values between both channels, the more deer they are the less they have this effect. With resistors you can limit this effect (which will make one channel noticeably louder than the other) to a minimum. OFC cables are standard now and cheap, what is your problem, rasz?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stereopotentiometers tend to have different values between both channels, the more deer they are the less they have this effect. With resistors you can limit this effect (which will make one channel noticeably louder than the other) to a minimum. OFC cables are standard now and cheap, what is your problem, rasz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

