<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googles servers revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirdwheel</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-160748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thirdwheel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-160748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;wow..srsly..its a 360 MB with the case ripped away….extra storage added…

Last I checked, a 360 runs on 3-core IBM PowerPC processors, not twin Xeons.  GYFS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;wow..srsly..its a 360 MB with the case ripped away….extra storage added…</p>
<p>Last I checked, a 360 runs on 3-core IBM PowerPC processors, not twin Xeons.  GYFS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCL</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-111836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GCL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-111836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah right. And the previous comment should be removed as it is a form of spam.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right. And the previous comment should be removed as it is a form of spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netrackindia</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-111791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[netrackindia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-111791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NetRack is world wide manufactures of network components like Server racks, Network Racks, Power Distribution Unit, Cable Organizer, Cable Runways, Lab Racks, Wall Mount Racks and Fiber Distribution Unit etc

For more details visit :http://www.netrackindia.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetRack is world wide manufactures of network components like Server racks, Network Racks, Power Distribution Unit, Cable Organizer, Cable Runways, Lab Racks, Wall Mount Racks and Fiber Distribution Unit etc</p>
<p>For more details visit :<a href="http://www.netrackindia.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netrackindia.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknitcorpse</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-96339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknitcorpse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-96339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow..srsly..its a 360 MB with the case ripped away....extra storage added...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow..srsly..its a 360 MB with the case ripped away&#8230;.extra storage added&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechTips</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-78504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechTips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-78504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not seems to be ..... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not seems to be &#8230;.. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCL</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-71294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GCL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-71294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@abehman
At which one of us are you addressing? Mine or Sparky?

Of the two mine goes into detail. His goes in depth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@abehman<br />
At which one of us are you addressing? Mine or Sparky?</p>
<p>Of the two mine goes into detail. His goes in depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abehman</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-71289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abehman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-71289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[--almost, but that&#039;s not all they use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;almost, but that&#8217;s not all they use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparky</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-71155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sparky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-71155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple years ago, you could purchase gigabyte Mainboards (8IPXDREL-GG) on ebay (also some geek website) - very minimal; 2x 2.4 xeons, 6x Memory slots (PC-2100), IDE, 2x USB, 1x PCI, onboard video and serial.
These were being solds in the hundreds quantity - I do wonder if it&#039;s possible they decided to sell a heap of &#039;old stock&#039;.
These systems wouldnt need much - since all they&#039;re doing is sitting there and collecting data, and listening to instructions from the &#039;main&#039; server. Highly feasible, and cost effective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple years ago, you could purchase gigabyte Mainboards (8IPXDREL-GG) on ebay (also some geek website) &#8211; very minimal; 2x 2.4 xeons, 6x Memory slots (PC-2100), IDE, 2x USB, 1x PCI, onboard video and serial.<br />
These were being solds in the hundreds quantity &#8211; I do wonder if it&#8217;s possible they decided to sell a heap of &#8216;old stock&#8217;.<br />
These systems wouldnt need much &#8211; since all they&#8217;re doing is sitting there and collecting data, and listening to instructions from the &#8216;main&#8217; server. Highly feasible, and cost effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCL</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GCL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excuse me!
It&#039;s not a prank. If anything it reflects upon Google&#039;s talents for doing the impossible. According to one Google Engineer I know rather well, all of their hardware is built from off the shelf parts, and is further customized.

But when it exhibits a solid failure, it gets yanked and a new one gets installed.

And that Olivetti 486 job you&#039;re discussing was one of many they built for AT&amp;T at that time AT&amp;T owned them. They ran the ESS or switches that ran the exchanges, they were part of the 3B series of designs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me!<br />
It&#8217;s not a prank. If anything it reflects upon Google&#8217;s talents for doing the impossible. According to one Google Engineer I know rather well, all of their hardware is built from off the shelf parts, and is further customized.</p>
<p>But when it exhibits a solid failure, it gets yanked and a new one gets installed.</p>
<p>And that Olivetti 486 job you&#8217;re discussing was one of many they built for AT&amp;T at that time AT&amp;T owned them. They ran the ESS or switches that ran the exchanges, they were part of the 3B series of designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What cracks me up is the comments in this thread purporting that any of the authors know an iota about server design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What cracks me up is the comments in this thread purporting that any of the authors know an iota about server design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laminar</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laminar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe someone should grammar-check the articles before they&#039;re posted, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone should grammar-check the articles before they&#8217;re posted, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who think this was a prank are severely misguided.

Before google released the photos, it was commonly known that google:

- prefers simple, cheap, commodity hardware
- uses velcro instead of screws
- was doing serious research into 12V systems with embedded battery backup. (iirc there were also hints that they were using this config in production)
- doesn&#039;t replace servers as they fail. its a periodic task where workers pull the failed servers in a center en masse, repair them, and put them back into service
- uses RAM for active datastores, with HD being merely a backup

The pics are /perfectly/ consistent with what was already known. 

I can&#039;t wait until pics come out of Google&#039;s 10Gbit custom switches -- I bet they look a lot alike...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who think this was a prank are severely misguided.</p>
<p>Before google released the photos, it was commonly known that google:</p>
<p>- prefers simple, cheap, commodity hardware<br />
- uses velcro instead of screws<br />
- was doing serious research into 12V systems with embedded battery backup. (iirc there were also hints that they were using this config in production)<br />
- doesn&#8217;t replace servers as they fail. its a periodic task where workers pull the failed servers in a center en masse, repair them, and put them back into service<br />
- uses RAM for active datastores, with HD being merely a backup</p>
<p>The pics are /perfectly/ consistent with what was already known. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait until pics come out of Google&#8217;s 10Gbit custom switches &#8212; I bet they look a lot alike&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will d.</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[will d.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah what&#039;s so funny or prankish about cleverly designed servers that google would need to run as effeciently as it does?  i originally thought it was a prank on apr 1st until i looked at it more and realized there was nothing funny about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah what&#8217;s so funny or prankish about cleverly designed servers that google would need to run as effeciently as it does?  i originally thought it was a prank on apr 1st until i looked at it more and realized there was nothing funny about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikk</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ikk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in early 90&#039;s Olivetti had 486 servers with built-in 12V battery. Battery was connected to power supply and functioned as UPS. Olivetti PSU had all normal voltages so it was bit different than this Google variant, but exactly same idea. I saved two of those Olivetti power supplied years ago because they were special, but sadly have lost them since.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in early 90&#8242;s Olivetti had 486 servers with built-in 12V battery. Battery was connected to power supply and functioned as UPS. Olivetti PSU had all normal voltages so it was bit different than this Google variant, but exactly same idea. I saved two of those Olivetti power supplied years ago because they were special, but sadly have lost them since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nubie</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/04/11/googles-servers-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-70269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nubie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=10305#comment-70269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, if it is an april fools joke then check out the black and white picture of dozens of them in racks.

How are they going to fake that?

It is supposed to be a frame cap from a video, so if you could see the video it would be conclusive.

The hardware photos and specs are enough for me though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, if it is an april fools joke then check out the black and white picture of dozens of them in racks.</p>
<p>How are they going to fake that?</p>
<p>It is supposed to be a frame cap from a video, so if you could see the video it would be conclusive.</p>
<p>The hardware photos and specs are enough for me though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

