Comments on: Controlling spykee via web cam using your fingers http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/ Fresh hacks every day Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:22:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Shawn http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70940 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:37:50 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70940 Wow, what a dork.

]]> By: SelfSilent http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70774 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:15:15 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70774 If you know you are going to be filming yourself, the first thing you would do is take of the revolting jumper that your Nan bought you for Christmas.

]]> By: jimslipper http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70741 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:05:57 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70741 Are you a Mime ?

]]> By: billhates http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70740 Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:04:40 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70740 another bullshit Idea…

]]> By: therian http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70714 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:47:11 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70714 this video give me a good laugh :)

]]> By: izaaah http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70699 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:11:24 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70699 waahhhwww green fingers

]]> By: Nicklaus Michael (Cold) http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70687 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:09:32 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70687 Well he was giving you guys what he was doing with his fingers as a example then youre suppose to watch the following videos of spykee in action using his finger movements.. I caught on to it.. anyone else……..? Pretty cool be even cooler if you put it in a constructive application setting..

]]> By: Hopo28 http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70683 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:31:53 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70683 LEGO is a company that make plastic bricks that fit together… (commonly known as LEGO pieces)

“brickOS [Formerly legOS] is an Open Source project that provides a C and C++ programming environment for the Lego Mindstorms Robotics Kit, allowing the owner of such a kit to program in good old-fashioned C instead of the standard Lego Programming Language.” http://legos.sourceforge.net/)

]]> By: grovenstien http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70638 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:48:16 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70638 Thats some funky moves hes got there!

]]> By: pirlone-cojone http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70607 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:20:09 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70607 i think the correct video is

v=a6RbKhkg95

]]> By: mesoiam http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70603 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:53:01 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70603 LEGO

]]> By: epokh http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70582 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:41:53 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70582 Absolutely: it’s a bit embarrassing.
They should put the second video, maybe I can swap the video files on youtube hoping that I doesn’t change the ID. :-(

]]> By: cynic http://hackaday.com/2009/04/14/controlling-spykee-via-web-cam-using-your-fingers/comment-page-1/#comment-70525 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:27:37 +0000 http://hackaday.com/?p=10368#comment-70525 That video shows absolutely nothing other than the fact he can’t smile on camera, why use that one in the article when the other two exist and show a little of what he’s doing?

]]>