<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronic stethoscope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shenita Boyette</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-524313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shenita Boyette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-524313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question guys, what happens if the spuds don&#039;t meet our price ? do we give in and let him go on the cheap ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question guys, what happens if the spuds don&#8217;t meet our price ? do we give in and let him go on the cheap ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vik Olliver</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-150058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vik Olliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-150058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, it *is* a bionic ear. This is not meant to be a quantum leap in technology, just a hack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, it *is* a bionic ear. This is not meant to be a quantum leap in technology, just a hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small electronic</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-148887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[small electronic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-148887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is too old technology, gov or PI use laser to detact your speech. easy, can do it very far away, as long as temperate does not vary a lot. and crystal clear, can be used as court evidenc, do not get caught easily. Why use this old design. Or use a Bonic ear can do the job as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is too old technology, gov or PI use laser to detact your speech. easy, can do it very far away, as long as temperate does not vary a lot. and crystal clear, can be used as court evidenc, do not get caught easily. Why use this old design. Or use a Bonic ear can do the job as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vrekks</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vrekks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wasnt this from kip kay and also on brink?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wasnt this from kip kay and also on brink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;why dont doctors use them more? because the medical equipment company can sell them a simple tube for $350&quot;

No, you can buy a high quality stethoscope for 35.00. It just doesn&#039;t come with the word &quot;Lxxxxxx&quot; on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why dont doctors use them more? because the medical equipment company can sell them a simple tube for $350&#8243;</p>
<p>No, you can buy a high quality stethoscope for 35.00. It just doesn&#8217;t come with the word &#8220;Lxxxxxx&#8221; on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haku</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haku]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too thought this idea sounded familiar, then I remembered this article from 2007
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563459/MP3-players-could-replace-stethoscopes.html

I&#039;ve got a couple of those Spy Ear thingamajigs I bought many years ago intending to find a parabolic dish to make a homebrew long distance listener but never got aronud to it so they&#039;re still in their packets.
Now I need a stethoscope as well as a parabolic dish for projects I&#039;ll never get round to finishing ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too thought this idea sounded familiar, then I remembered this article from 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563459/MP3-players-could-replace-stethoscopes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1563459/MP3-players-could-replace-stethoscopes.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a couple of those Spy Ear thingamajigs I bought many years ago intending to find a parabolic dish to make a homebrew long distance listener but never got aronud to it so they&#8217;re still in their packets.<br />
Now I need a stethoscope as well as a parabolic dish for projects I&#8217;ll never get round to finishing ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m.w.</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m.w.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Wait a sec, this hasn’t been done before? This sounds like the kind of thing that should have been not just built, but put into service in hospitals years ago. I gotta make one of these…&quot;

...made one of these a long time ago (1st year at medschool) thinking the same thing... in reality they are less practical than a stethoscope.  Earphones tend to tangle up, especially when rushing between patient.  The beforementioned battery aspect is valid too.  Another aspect is that you need to disinfect these after each patient (otherwise you tend to transfer nosocomial diseases to your weakest patients).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wait a sec, this hasn’t been done before? This sounds like the kind of thing that should have been not just built, but put into service in hospitals years ago. I gotta make one of these…&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;made one of these a long time ago (1st year at medschool) thinking the same thing&#8230; in reality they are less practical than a stethoscope.  Earphones tend to tangle up, especially when rushing between patient.  The beforementioned battery aspect is valid too.  Another aspect is that you need to disinfect these after each patient (otherwise you tend to transfer nosocomial diseases to your weakest patients).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porcus</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[porcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s another toy similar to this one: http://www.behance.net/Gallery/Stethosphone/234909]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another toy similar to this one: <a href="http://www.behance.net/Gallery/Stethosphone/234909" rel="nofollow">http://www.behance.net/Gallery/Stethosphone/234909</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeFex</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeFex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why dont doctors use them more? because the medical equipment company can sell them a simple tube for $350]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why dont doctors use them more? because the medical equipment company can sell them a simple tube for $350</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yours truly did medical electronics BSc, needless to say isolation is paramount! i&#039;d have used a small 1.2v battery powered read amplifier and an optical fibre based coupler just to make sure..

also this approach may work well with some QTC (quantum tunneling composite) as the sensor, as the resistance change is fairly linear and immune to mains noise.

-A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yours truly did medical electronics BSc, needless to say isolation is paramount! i&#8217;d have used a small 1.2v battery powered read amplifier and an optical fibre based coupler just to make sure..</p>
<p>also this approach may work well with some QTC (quantum tunneling composite) as the sensor, as the resistance change is fairly linear and immune to mains noise.</p>
<p>-A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh...

This was my final year engineering project. Made an electronic stethoscope with a datalogger on the other end and recorded the sounds. The idea was for training, you could demonstrate the sound of an arrhythmia to a entire class of students so they knew what to look for. You could map it visually and hear the playback to help comprehension. Plus your GP could keep a record onfile so they could compare your heart patterns over your lifetime, thought you might be able to predict things eventually (with enough data). Think I got it all down to under $20AUD. Then I graduated and went into mining &amp; resource engineering...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230;</p>
<p>This was my final year engineering project. Made an electronic stethoscope with a datalogger on the other end and recorded the sounds. The idea was for training, you could demonstrate the sound of an arrhythmia to a entire class of students so they knew what to look for. You could map it visually and hear the playback to help comprehension. Plus your GP could keep a record onfile so they could compare your heart patterns over your lifetime, thought you might be able to predict things eventually (with enough data). Think I got it all down to under $20AUD. Then I graduated and went into mining &amp; resource engineering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[when you amplify something, you increase noise as well as useful signal, so this unit let you hear actually less than regular one. Same as with antennas, ear is the best amp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when you amplify something, you increase noise as well as useful signal, so this unit let you hear actually less than regular one. Same as with antennas, ear is the best amp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundata</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rundata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great hack tho ^_^]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great hack tho ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundata</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rundata]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heh the nip pic  still would have been the better choice :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh the nip pic  still would have been the better choice :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calebkraft</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/02/electronic-stethoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-77173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calebkraft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11363#comment-77173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha, I liked the picture. Nothing wrong with pierced nips. I actually wanted to use that for the article image. We thought this one showed the product better though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, I liked the picture. Nothing wrong with pierced nips. I actually wanted to use that for the article image. We thought this one showed the product better though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

