<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluetooth motorcycle control panel with arduino</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorcycle nut</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-122740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motorcycle nut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-122740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that&#039;s a beautiful coming together of tech and biker geekiness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s a beautiful coming together of tech and biker geekiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Driver Education</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-112675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Driver Education]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-112675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite Interesting. Great post Keep posting Interesting articles.I keep visiting this blog often.Thanks and all the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite Interesting. Great post Keep posting Interesting articles.I keep visiting this blog often.Thanks and all the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daytona Parts</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-111001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daytona Parts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-111001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neat hack. Wondering: does it have bluetooth support ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat hack. Wondering: does it have bluetooth support ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcamp13</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-81131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcamp13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-81131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real reason &quot;they&quot; ride &quot;real&quot; bikes is to blame the bike for the shaking they are really doing over a buck twenty! (if they don&#039;t fall apart before then..

Member of Club200 8/3/2000 202.4mph 1999 &quot;built&quot; Hayabusa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason &#8220;they&#8221; ride &#8220;real&#8221; bikes is to blame the bike for the shaking they are really doing over a buck twenty! (if they don&#8217;t fall apart before then..</p>
<p>Member of Club200 8/3/2000 202.4mph 1999 &#8220;built&#8221; Hayabusa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see I&#039;m not the only one putting microcontrollers on my bike. 

I don&#039;t like arduinos or pics and I&#039;ll tell you why: $10 for a bare bones arduino stamp? I can get the atmega168 in an arduino for about $4 and some projects don&#039;t need that much power; infact a lot of the projects I see that use a $30 arduino can be made using a $1.50 attiny. kudos to the arduino for being an open source design, but for $1.50 I can still use the same great development tools you use on the arduino. I used to use pics. I started right when the first flash based pics came out. they were ok and at the time were the only option for hobbyists, but like many others I grew tired of &#039;free trial&#039; compilers and windows only software. atmel stole microchips idea and did it right: cheap versitile microcontrollers that don&#039;t need any external parts to operate and open source cross platform development tools. my avr programmer cost $23 it uses a USB connection (who has a printer port these days?) and I can develop on any os I like. and since avr-gcc is open source I&#039;m free to sell anything I make without any legal concerns.

BTW: 
I&#039;m more of a cafe guy myself but crotch rockets are not toys any more then a handgun is a toy. they just get a bad rep &#039;cause they look so silly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see I&#8217;m not the only one putting microcontrollers on my bike. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like arduinos or pics and I&#8217;ll tell you why: $10 for a bare bones arduino stamp? I can get the atmega168 in an arduino for about $4 and some projects don&#8217;t need that much power; infact a lot of the projects I see that use a $30 arduino can be made using a $1.50 attiny. kudos to the arduino for being an open source design, but for $1.50 I can still use the same great development tools you use on the arduino. I used to use pics. I started right when the first flash based pics came out. they were ok and at the time were the only option for hobbyists, but like many others I grew tired of &#8216;free trial&#8217; compilers and windows only software. atmel stole microchips idea and did it right: cheap versitile microcontrollers that don&#8217;t need any external parts to operate and open source cross platform development tools. my avr programmer cost $23 it uses a USB connection (who has a printer port these days?) and I can develop on any os I like. and since avr-gcc is open source I&#8217;m free to sell anything I make without any legal concerns.</p>
<p>BTW:<br />
I&#8217;m more of a cafe guy myself but crotch rockets are not toys any more then a handgun is a toy. they just get a bad rep &#8217;cause they look so silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quan-Time</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quan-Time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@TZ: the update is in the order of a few ms.. was running like poopy on that vid, but its almost realtime.. but 15fps-ish.. Its still quite smooth.

@KYLE: true, but i still made mine all myself.  Saying that, i did buy the touch LCD, but i stripped it and made the housing / rest of it.

@BILL ROWE: im half tempted to ditch the dash and go for something sleek.  Ive been looking around for a way to make my own custom LCD.  get the crystals fabricated to my requirements.  Alas, thats hugely expensive, but the chinese will do it.
Im half deciding to get some sort of ~5&quot; LCD with a back light.  Would make power requirements drop, and open a few more options ive been thinking of if i fab my own driver unit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TZ: the update is in the order of a few ms.. was running like poopy on that vid, but its almost realtime.. but 15fps-ish.. Its still quite smooth.</p>
<p>@KYLE: true, but i still made mine all myself.  Saying that, i did buy the touch LCD, but i stripped it and made the housing / rest of it.</p>
<p>@BILL ROWE: im half tempted to ditch the dash and go for something sleek.  Ive been looking around for a way to make my own custom LCD.  get the crystals fabricated to my requirements.  Alas, thats hugely expensive, but the chinese will do it.<br />
Im half deciding to get some sort of ~5&#8243; LCD with a back light.  Would make power requirements drop, and open a few more options ive been thinking of if i fab my own driver unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: absolutezero</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutezero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;it seems no matter what you want to do with them you need an addon of some description that doesn’t come cheap, and there always a newer version or maybe im just missinformed or biased or both&quot;

@FunkyGibbon:

It works with all your regular components (sensors, leds, lcds, etc). 

At its most basic, its really just a way to get a microcontroller into a project while abstracting away some of the details of doing so.

There are a lot of clones and such out there, but they&#039;re mostly based off of the same atmega chip, and in the end, have pretty much the same functionality (digital i/o, analog i/o, serial com, and software control over that i/o).

The duemilanove (~$35) is the one i&#039;ve been developing/breadboarding with, but I just ordered a couple duinostamp kits (~$10) which are pretty minimalistic. I&#039;ll be using these to implement my finalized designs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it seems no matter what you want to do with them you need an addon of some description that doesn’t come cheap, and there always a newer version or maybe im just missinformed or biased or both&#8221;</p>
<p>@FunkyGibbon:</p>
<p>It works with all your regular components (sensors, leds, lcds, etc). </p>
<p>At its most basic, its really just a way to get a microcontroller into a project while abstracting away some of the details of doing so.</p>
<p>There are a lot of clones and such out there, but they&#8217;re mostly based off of the same atmega chip, and in the end, have pretty much the same functionality (digital i/o, analog i/o, serial com, and software control over that i/o).</p>
<p>The duemilanove (~$35) is the one i&#8217;ve been developing/breadboarding with, but I just ordered a couple duinostamp kits (~$10) which are pretty minimalistic. I&#8217;ll be using these to implement my finalized designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on the pattern of spokes, a variable reluctance sensor might work to get speed pulses.  Or a GPS.  I wonder if you could modify an optical mouse...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on the pattern of spokes, a variable reluctance sensor might work to get speed pulses.  Or a GPS.  I wonder if you could modify an optical mouse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill rowe</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill rowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mike: You have a point, the reed switch might be good for millions and millions of cycles but that would only be thousands of miles. I rejected the hall effect sensor because it meant running 5v to the rear wheel but maybe it&#039;s a better idea in the long run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike: You have a point, the reed switch might be good for millions and millions of cycles but that would only be thousands of miles. I rejected the hall effect sensor because it meant running 5v to the rear wheel but maybe it&#8217;s a better idea in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me like having a reed switch mounted to the wheel might be something else to upgrade.  The little reed in there could probably handle the hours and hours of on/off thousands of times each minute, but a hall effect sensor might work a little better because of the fewer moving parts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me like having a reed switch mounted to the wheel might be something else to upgrade.  The little reed in there could probably handle the hours and hours of on/off thousands of times each minute, but a hall effect sensor might work a little better because of the fewer moving parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alien</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, i meant funky gibbon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, i meant funky gibbon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tz</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an arduino mega on order.  But I&#039;ll need to tweak the software to read variable pulse widths.  J1850 should be directly readable on a module, as would the Valentine V1 stream, but I would need the two IC inputs on the mega (or two of the smaller chips).

Both the AVR and PIC have their limitations - almost everything needs additional hardware.  For that matter they don&#039;t come with LEDs or LCD displays.

But I can do the Arduino on linux, mac, or windows.

I just looked at the datasheet of the 16f877 - I see nothing there that would be better at any automotive bus I know of (J1850 of either flavor, CAN, or ISO9141/14230).  All would need hardware and software.

The chips are more similar than different.  I happen to be using an AVR at work and found the opensource tools, but if the same were available for the PIC I would probably be using one of those instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an arduino mega on order.  But I&#8217;ll need to tweak the software to read variable pulse widths.  J1850 should be directly readable on a module, as would the Valentine V1 stream, but I would need the two IC inputs on the mega (or two of the smaller chips).</p>
<p>Both the AVR and PIC have their limitations &#8211; almost everything needs additional hardware.  For that matter they don&#8217;t come with LEDs or LCD displays.</p>
<p>But I can do the Arduino on linux, mac, or windows.</p>
<p>I just looked at the datasheet of the 16f877 &#8211; I see nothing there that would be better at any automotive bus I know of (J1850 of either flavor, CAN, or ISO9141/14230).  All would need hardware and software.</p>
<p>The chips are more similar than different.  I happen to be using an AVR at work and found the opensource tools, but if the same were available for the PIC I would probably be using one of those instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alien</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@absolutexero: Sounds like a good project you have going, I&#039;d be interested to read some info on it if you&#039;re openeing it up for public veiwing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@absolutexero: Sounds like a good project you have going, I&#8217;d be interested to read some info on it if you&#8217;re openeing it up for public veiwing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Funky Gibbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@absolutezero, yeah it&#039;s a great project but from what i&#039;ve seen of Arduino&#039;s they seem to have been thought up by steve jobs, it seems no matter what you want to do with them you need an addon of some description that doesn&#039;t come cheap, and there always a newer version or maybe im just missinformed or biased or both, doesn&#039;t anyone use Pic&#039;s anymore, everything you could need in one package, im completeing a similar project connected to my car through the OBD interface and displaying stats on a terminal (Graphic LCD) and yes driven by a Pic 16F877 at no extra cost of addons or obsolete hardware versions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@absolutezero, yeah it&#8217;s a great project but from what i&#8217;ve seen of Arduino&#8217;s they seem to have been thought up by steve jobs, it seems no matter what you want to do with them you need an addon of some description that doesn&#8217;t come cheap, and there always a newer version or maybe im just missinformed or biased or both, doesn&#8217;t anyone use Pic&#8217;s anymore, everything you could need in one package, im completeing a similar project connected to my car through the OBD interface and displaying stats on a terminal (Graphic LCD) and yes driven by a Pic 16F877 at no extra cost of addons or obsolete hardware versions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McDonald</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/06/14/bluetooth-motorcycle-control-panel-with-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-78122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle McDonald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=11463#comment-78122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[quan-time: I think it&#039;s pretty clear why the other one was posted. I don&#039;t see any breadboards, Arduinos, stray wires, or low-resolution LCD displays attached to yours :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quan-time: I think it&#8217;s pretty clear why the other one was posted. I don&#8217;t see any breadboards, Arduinos, stray wires, or low-resolution LCD displays attached to yours :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

