<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homemade UAV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iloveacid</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-151361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iloveacid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-151361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no, he means helvetica...

(lil late, but couldn&#039;t help myself)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, he means helvetica&#8230;</p>
<p>(lil late, but couldn&#8217;t help myself)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihateacid</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-99975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ihateacid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-99975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[um arial.... do you mean aerial?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um arial&#8230;. do you mean aerial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fekete</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fekete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disclaimer:

I do not advocate carrying any illegal payloads, or operating a civilian UAV for any purpose other than those deemed legal by the appropriate governing authorities.

Any of my comments that contradict the above statement were made for dramatic/humorous effect and should thereby not be taken seriously or otherwise construed as intent or advocacy for any action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclaimer:</p>
<p>I do not advocate carrying any illegal payloads, or operating a civilian UAV for any purpose other than those deemed legal by the appropriate governing authorities.</p>
<p>Any of my comments that contradict the above statement were made for dramatic/humorous effect and should thereby not be taken seriously or otherwise construed as intent or advocacy for any action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fekete</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fekete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy shit, apparently there&#039;s the Super Flyin&#039; King now (http://www.btemodels.com/sfk.html).

In the FAQ for the kit, the designer discusses payload capabilities:

&quot;Oooh, that&#039;s tough to answer without actually testing. My guess is it that it wouldn&#039;t even breathe hard with ten pounds of payload. Twenty pounds should be very manageable with careful piloting. More than that and I&#039;d consider some beefing up in certain areas.&quot;

That&#039;s a lot of cameras/cocaine/ANFO/etc...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, apparently there&#8217;s the Super Flyin&#8217; King now (<a href="http://www.btemodels.com/sfk.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.btemodels.com/sfk.html</a>).</p>
<p>In the FAQ for the kit, the designer discusses payload capabilities:</p>
<p>&#8220;Oooh, that&#8217;s tough to answer without actually testing. My guess is it that it wouldn&#8217;t even breathe hard with ten pounds of payload. Twenty pounds should be very manageable with careful piloting. More than that and I&#8217;d consider some beefing up in certain areas.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of cameras/cocaine/ANFO/etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fekete</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fekete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back when me and my dad were into flying RC planes, we had one of these:
http://www.btemodels.com/flyin_king.html

Never put it together, but its a pretty big gas (well actually diesel nitro-methane) kit. Able to haul quite a bit at a decent speed..

If speed is not a concern, the Lazy Bee kit
(http://clancyaviation.globalhobby.com/lazybee.htm) is a high lift design that can take off in about 5 feet. It&#039;s not that big but I kinda remember a larger version of the original being sold.

The only issue would be running a gas powered UAV. So far I haven&#039;t seen anybody do this, although I&#039;ve been itching to give it a shot.

Anyways, hope this helps anyone seeking payload capable kits for a UAV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when me and my dad were into flying RC planes, we had one of these:<br />
<a href="http://www.btemodels.com/flyin_king.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.btemodels.com/flyin_king.html</a></p>
<p>Never put it together, but its a pretty big gas (well actually diesel nitro-methane) kit. Able to haul quite a bit at a decent speed..</p>
<p>If speed is not a concern, the Lazy Bee kit<br />
(<a href="http://clancyaviation.globalhobby.com/lazybee.htm" rel="nofollow">http://clancyaviation.globalhobby.com/lazybee.htm</a>) is a high lift design that can take off in about 5 feet. It&#8217;s not that big but I kinda remember a larger version of the original being sold.</p>
<p>The only issue would be running a gas powered UAV. So far I haven&#8217;t seen anybody do this, although I&#8217;ve been itching to give it a shot.</p>
<p>Anyways, hope this helps anyone seeking payload capable kits for a UAV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There goes the jobs of the people in the traffic copter. He should employ it as a personal AWACS.
&quot;See that plane up there? It follows me.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There goes the jobs of the people in the traffic copter. He should employ it as a personal AWACS.<br />
&#8220;See that plane up there? It follows me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmholm</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cmholm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could one get away with busting the FAA regs? For most locales away from busy airports, probably. But, the skies have eyes, and who just wants to go fly once? Hence, the party line on the DIY UAV wikis is to just say no, until such time as the FAA loosens up. If regulators start seeing evidence of unauthorized autonomous long distance and/or high altitude flights, it&#039;s just going to make life difficult for hobbyists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could one get away with busting the FAA regs? For most locales away from busy airports, probably. But, the skies have eyes, and who just wants to go fly once? Hence, the party line on the DIY UAV wikis is to just say no, until such time as the FAA loosens up. If regulators start seeing evidence of unauthorized autonomous long distance and/or high altitude flights, it&#8217;s just going to make life difficult for hobbyists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you thing such small plain will be detectable on radars ? how they will know you over limit altitude if they cant see it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you thing such small plain will be detectable on radars ? how they will know you over limit altitude if they cant see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Holmberg</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Holmberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Tj Bordelon points out, we in the US are rather limited in what we can legally do, rather than what&#039;s technically possible. For instance, Art Vanden Berg’s autonomous glider would have landed him in hot water if he were south of B.C. 

We can fly an autonomous UAV, but for now it&#039;s gotta stay below 400 ft AGL, within visual range, and with immediate operator override. Needless to say, that&#039;s putting a crimp into my dream of lofting one to 90kft.

http://diydrones.com/profiles/blog/show?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A28583]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Tj Bordelon points out, we in the US are rather limited in what we can legally do, rather than what&#8217;s technically possible. For instance, Art Vanden Berg’s autonomous glider would have landed him in hot water if he were south of B.C. </p>
<p>We can fly an autonomous UAV, but for now it&#8217;s gotta stay below 400 ft AGL, within visual range, and with immediate operator override. Needless to say, that&#8217;s putting a crimp into my dream of lofting one to 90kft.</p>
<p><a href="http://diydrones.com/profiles/blog/show?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A28583" rel="nofollow">http://diydrones.com/profiles/blog/show?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A28583</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Holmberg</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Holmberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tj Bordelon, you&#039;ve put together some great stuff, some of which I hope I can play with on a patched up old (expendable!) glider in the garage. I wasn&#039;t too sure about the IR-based attitude sensing, and you&#039;ve worked around it.

Re: ITAR, if all but a few subsequent code tweaks of your work is already out there, great. I had noticed the previous IMU stuff in your portfolio, which reminded me of the travails of others (working on more sophisticated stuff) who forgot that there&#039;s no Constitutional right to &quot;export&quot; tech, contract or no.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tj Bordelon, you&#8217;ve put together some great stuff, some of which I hope I can play with on a patched up old (expendable!) glider in the garage. I wasn&#8217;t too sure about the IR-based attitude sensing, and you&#8217;ve worked around it.</p>
<p>Re: ITAR, if all but a few subsequent code tweaks of your work is already out there, great. I had noticed the previous IMU stuff in your portfolio, which reminded me of the travails of others (working on more sophisticated stuff) who forgot that there&#8217;s no Constitutional right to &#8220;export&#8221; tech, contract or no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftsquarebracket</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leftsquarebracket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tj

Very, very awesome work.  Boards look professional grade, and from what you say, the performance is too.

Took a look around your site, and all I can say is &quot;holy crap.&quot;  You, sir, are a god among mortals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tj</p>
<p>Very, very awesome work.  Boards look professional grade, and from what you say, the performance is too.</p>
<p>Took a look around your site, and all I can say is &#8220;holy crap.&#8221;  You, sir, are a god among mortals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tj Bordelon</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tj Bordelon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTION: I do not fly 100km away. The modem range (theoretical) is 100km. I fly line-of-site at all times, below 400 feet. Anything outside of that is just risking loss of the aircraft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION: I do not fly 100km away. The modem range (theoretical) is 100km. I fly line-of-site at all times, below 400 feet. Anything outside of that is just risking loss of the aircraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tj Bordelon</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tj Bordelon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OH- no none of this stuff is complicated. That&#039;s my point.

I&#039;ve written an article for Circuit Cellar on the IMU algorithm. It&#039;s 15 lines on non-PHD code. I think it&#039;s the simplest IMU code I&#039;ve come across. Very easy to visualize. The point is always (For me) to roll your own for maximum fun and learning.

The auto land and autopilot stuff are a handful of feedback loops. Nothing too complicated.

And to cmholm: I have signed no such contract, nor do I intend to give away government owned secrets. I have none anyway. All this stuff is public domain. I&#039;ll never understand the reasons people think UAVs are some secret weapon. I think anyone who wants to build one can do it now. I hold no secret sauce aside from my IMU algorithm, and the only advantage there is the simplicity.

It&#039;s far cheaper and more effective to make a swarm of autonomous Honda civics! Their payload capacity is higher anyway, plus you can install bass tubes and neon under them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH- no none of this stuff is complicated. That&#8217;s my point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written an article for Circuit Cellar on the IMU algorithm. It&#8217;s 15 lines on non-PHD code. I think it&#8217;s the simplest IMU code I&#8217;ve come across. Very easy to visualize. The point is always (For me) to roll your own for maximum fun and learning.</p>
<p>The auto land and autopilot stuff are a handful of feedback loops. Nothing too complicated.</p>
<p>And to cmholm: I have signed no such contract, nor do I intend to give away government owned secrets. I have none anyway. All this stuff is public domain. I&#8217;ll never understand the reasons people think UAVs are some secret weapon. I think anyone who wants to build one can do it now. I hold no secret sauce aside from my IMU algorithm, and the only advantage there is the simplicity.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s far cheaper and more effective to make a swarm of autonomous Honda civics! Their payload capacity is higher anyway, plus you can install bass tubes and neon under them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tj Bordelon</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tj Bordelon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to use the kits everyone is talking about. They all require lots of work. Plus I was generally unsatisfied with them. I know there are a few $1k autopilot units, but all the sparkfun / Adruino kits require loads of custom work anyway.

I think the interesting thing about my project is simply that I did it from scratch, and it is possible for 1 person to build a UAV from the boards up without starting with someone else&#039;s stuff.

Maybe in a year or so, a cheap autopilot will be available for a few hundred. But a plug and play version at that price point doesn&#039;t exist.

But that&#039;s not the point. The point is that I had a blast and made a UAV from chips. You can go buy many of the things on this site and have one in 15 seconds. But where&#039;s the fun in that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to use the kits everyone is talking about. They all require lots of work. Plus I was generally unsatisfied with them. I know there are a few $1k autopilot units, but all the sparkfun / Adruino kits require loads of custom work anyway.</p>
<p>I think the interesting thing about my project is simply that I did it from scratch, and it is possible for 1 person to build a UAV from the boards up without starting with someone else&#8217;s stuff.</p>
<p>Maybe in a year or so, a cheap autopilot will be available for a few hundred. But a plug and play version at that price point doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the point. The point is that I had a blast and made a UAV from chips. You can go buy many of the things on this site and have one in 15 seconds. But where&#8217;s the fun in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therian</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/09/27/homemade-uav/comment-page-1/#comment-97087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=16126#comment-97087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*grenades]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*grenades</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

