<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gear clock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:18:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Parekh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-145271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Parekh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-145271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That sounds very cool Friendly Neighborhood Psycopath! I would love to see what it looks like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds very cool Friendly Neighborhood Psycopath! I would love to see what it looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Neighborhood Psycopath</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-145226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friendly Neighborhood Psycopath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-145226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ended up cutting one of these out of acrylic on a laser. It looked really cool, and I didn&#039;t actually know what that second slot was for until I read the schematic for the controller. HOLY CRAP IT LOOKS AWESOME! Red LEDs behind clear acrylic makes this clock. It cost nearly $100 for the materials (acrylic is expensive) but it turned out really well. Thanks for posting this, Alan, it was a really cool project. I&#039;ll see if I can post pictures somewhere to link to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ended up cutting one of these out of acrylic on a laser. It looked really cool, and I didn&#8217;t actually know what that second slot was for until I read the schematic for the controller. HOLY CRAP IT LOOKS AWESOME! Red LEDs behind clear acrylic makes this clock. It cost nearly $100 for the materials (acrylic is expensive) but it turned out really well. Thanks for posting this, Alan, it was a really cool project. I&#8217;ll see if I can post pictures somewhere to link to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Parekh</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Parekh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys thanks for the feedback!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strider_mt2k</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely more gear than fab, but groovy nonetheless!

;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely more gear than fab, but groovy nonetheless!</p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbott</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, i was thinking that it was aluminum plate at first... would have been badass... still an awesome clock though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, i was thinking that it was aluminum plate at first&#8230; would have been badass&#8230; still an awesome clock though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tehgringe</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tehgringe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MDF!!! Eeeeeew.

But aside from that awesome project, but I wanted METAL.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MDF!!! Eeeeeew.</p>
<p>But aside from that awesome project, but I wanted METAL&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stunmonkey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stunmonkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, My post was pretty long. It may have just been an accident then.
 I just spent a lot of time on it and I wanted to see some other thoughts on the idea. I thought it ran afoul of the moderators for some unknown reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, My post was pretty long. It may have just been an accident then.<br />
 I just spent a lot of time on it and I wanted to see some other thoughts on the idea. I thought it ran afoul of the moderators for some unknown reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Kraft</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb Kraft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@stunmonkey,
  Who is being censored?  I&#039;ve got a horrible case of the spams right now. I&#039;ve deleted nearly 50 posts lately that are nosensical and off topic and all seem to fit an identical formula.  Watch for them, they don&#039;t make any sense and all end with a period, space, comma.  like this. ,

I might have accidentally deleted something else, but I didn&#039;t intend to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stunmonkey,<br />
  Who is being censored?  I&#8217;ve got a horrible case of the spams right now. I&#8217;ve deleted nearly 50 posts lately that are nosensical and off topic and all seem to fit an identical formula.  Watch for them, they don&#8217;t make any sense and all end with a period, space, comma.  like this. ,</p>
<p>I might have accidentally deleted something else, but I didn&#8217;t intend to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stunmonkey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stunmonkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice new censorship system. WTF?

 Do you have to fellate every project now to get to post?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice new censorship system. WTF?</p>
<p> Do you have to fellate every project now to get to post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaevictus</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaevictus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, you said that.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, you said that.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaevictus</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaevictus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pookey: A sundial :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pookey: A sundial :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pookey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pookey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jason

I think a PIC chip is entirely appropriate for this application. With it, you get a crystal-controlled time base and a state-machine that will properly sequence stepper windings, as well as respond to user input for purpose of setting the clock. You get all that functionality for the cost of four parts... the PIC, two caps, and a crystal.

Whatever you use to sequence the stepper, you&#039;re still going to need driver transistors and current-limiting resistors, so I don&#039;t count those parts against this design. Even if you do, this is still a nice, lean implementation.

I&#039;ll bet the guy who programmed it learned something about PICs, assembler, and IDEs, to boot.

BTW, What approach did you use for the gear clock *you* built?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jason</p>
<p>I think a PIC chip is entirely appropriate for this application. With it, you get a crystal-controlled time base and a state-machine that will properly sequence stepper windings, as well as respond to user input for purpose of setting the clock. You get all that functionality for the cost of four parts&#8230; the PIC, two caps, and a crystal.</p>
<p>Whatever you use to sequence the stepper, you&#8217;re still going to need driver transistors and current-limiting resistors, so I don&#8217;t count those parts against this design. Even if you do, this is still a nice, lean implementation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet the guy who programmed it learned something about PICs, assembler, and IDEs, to boot.</p>
<p>BTW, What approach did you use for the gear clock *you* built?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pookey</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pookey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@sly

Interesting point... Can you think of *any* clock that is not inherently digital? 

For example, an hourglass appears to be analog, but the grains of sand are discrete. Since the passage of time is represented by the number of discrete grains that have fallen, an hourglass is a digital clock.

Even a gravity clock using water drops is digital, and for the same reason. Measure time with a stream of water? Still digital, because water is composed of discrete molecules.

The only clock I can think of that is truly analog is a sun-dial.

Can anyone think of other examples?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sly</p>
<p>Interesting point&#8230; Can you think of *any* clock that is not inherently digital? </p>
<p>For example, an hourglass appears to be analog, but the grains of sand are discrete. Since the passage of time is represented by the number of discrete grains that have fallen, an hourglass is a digital clock.</p>
<p>Even a gravity clock using water drops is digital, and for the same reason. Measure time with a stream of water? Still digital, because water is composed of discrete molecules.</p>
<p>The only clock I can think of that is truly analog is a sun-dial.</p>
<p>Can anyone think of other examples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sly</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s still a digital clock.  a true analog would have continuous motion with a simple DC motor.  any &quot;ticking&quot; would indicate a digital nature (even a purely mechanical clock that ticks is digital).  The readout is the only thing that can be considered analog.
[/technicalities]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s still a digital clock.  a true analog would have continuous motion with a simple DC motor.  any &#8220;ticking&#8221; would indicate a digital nature (even a purely mechanical clock that ticks is digital).  The readout is the only thing that can be considered analog.<br />
[/technicalities]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/22/gear-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-103229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17615#comment-103229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[really? really? An /entire/ PIC system to give you a 4PPS square wave?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really? really? An /entire/ PIC system to give you a 4PPS square wave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

