<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNC used to make 3D video using one camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/</link>
	<description>Fresh hacks every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walky</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool stuff indeed!

Anyway, I&#039;m not planning on building an automatic tracking system (would be too unstable, and my programming isn&#039;t that good anyway); I was thinking on tracking a predefined (by software) moving point, so I can get a smooth approximate of the camera movement (and, more importantly, make fast camera tests before each take, since it would be really, really bad if the camera moved unexpectedly after 2 hours of moving the puppet around). Another idea I have is making a system to record the manual movement of the camera, so it can later reproduce it exactly but step by step (optical encoders FTW!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff indeed!</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not planning on building an automatic tracking system (would be too unstable, and my programming isn&#8217;t that good anyway); I was thinking on tracking a predefined (by software) moving point, so I can get a smooth approximate of the camera movement (and, more importantly, make fast camera tests before each take, since it would be really, really bad if the camera moved unexpectedly after 2 hours of moving the puppet around). Another idea I have is making a system to record the manual movement of the camera, so it can later reproduce it exactly but step by step (optical encoders FTW!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triffid Hunter</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Triffid Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a group already doing this stuff WITHOUT the camera paths and in realtime! The technique is called monoslam (monocular simultaneous localisation and mapping), see youtube.com/activevision

very very cool stuff!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a group already doing this stuff WITHOUT the camera paths and in realtime! The technique is called monoslam (monocular simultaneous localisation and mapping), see youtube.com/activevision</p>
<p>very very cool stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walky</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@M4CGYV3R

I built a cnc machine (three of them, actually), and I&#039;m planning on using what I&#039;ve learn with it to make a camera control system for stop motion. I suck at programming, so it will probably take more time to make a decent &quot;moving point&quot; tracking system (so I can, for example, rotate the camera around a moving character while he&#039;s moving) than to actually build the rig.
The possibilities are endless. Most independent animators can&#039;t afford to buy a complex camera control system like the ones used in &quot;big&quot; movies; it&#039;s good to be a CNC hobbyist :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@M4CGYV3R</p>
<p>I built a cnc machine (three of them, actually), and I&#8217;m planning on using what I&#8217;ve learn with it to make a camera control system for stop motion. I suck at programming, so it will probably take more time to make a decent &#8220;moving point&#8221; tracking system (so I can, for example, rotate the camera around a moving character while he&#8217;s moving) than to actually build the rig.<br />
The possibilities are endless. Most independent animators can&#8217;t afford to buy a complex camera control system like the ones used in &#8220;big&#8221; movies; it&#8217;s good to be a CNC hobbyist :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markii</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow great hack?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow great hack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M4CGYV3R</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M4CGYV3R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not the best 3-d. That would make one hell of a stop-motion video rig though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the best 3-d. That would make one hell of a stop-motion video rig though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macona</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is similar to how Coraline was filmed. The camera takes one picture moves one side by ~5 inches and take another picture. Animator does his thing and process starts over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is similar to how Coraline was filmed. The camera takes one picture moves one side by ~5 inches and take another picture. Animator does his thing and process starts over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MakesLoveToArduinos</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MakesLoveToArduinos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Arduino.  Big fail.  Sponsors don&#039;t like these types of posts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Arduino.  Big fail.  Sponsors don&#8217;t like these types of posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: branno</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[branno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of how well it works or whether or not he had another camera, it is an interesting concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of how well it works or whether or not he had another camera, it is an interesting concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxpowa</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maxpowa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[๏̯͡๏]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>๏̯͡๏</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Daniel, I could not agree more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel, I could not agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course they were not identical, if they were it would not be 3d. The 3d effect is generated by giving each eye something slightly different to see. 

He obviously had two cameras. If not, what was he using to film the &#039;making of&#039; vid? Maybe he was using a still cam and I missed it. 

I suspect this is as much a &#039;can it be done&#039; type of project. But either way, he did it. He had his own reasons for doing it the way he did. If you are going to judge, judge on the fact that IT WORKS! He set out to do something that was non-trivial, and stuck with it until it did what he wanted. THAT is the point of this site, to celebrate [success &#124; tinkering &#124; learning &#124; what ever you want to call it]. 

I will continue to feed the trolls: I have been a near daily visitor to this site for years. Back when there were few comments, and even fewer posts (less than one a day on average) I felt the site&#039;s comments were almost worthless. Then H.A.D. Experienced a surge of growth. At that point the comments approched the intelectual level of slashdot comments. Sure, there were people who did not fully understand the subject of the post, but their comments were posted in good faith and it helped spur discussion. Now the comments are truly worthless. I am very close to ignoring the comments much the way I ignore Digg comments. 

If you don&#039;t agree with the project or the way it was done, or even if you think you could do better, I think I speak for many others when I say, I DON&#039;T CARE. It it isn&#039;t meant to continue the conversation (and no, putting a project down for any reason does not help advance the conversation. Now if you were to offer a solution to a precieved problem that would be different) I don&#039;t want to read it.

This was typed on my iPhone. Please ignore any spelling errors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they were not identical, if they were it would not be 3d. The 3d effect is generated by giving each eye something slightly different to see. </p>
<p>He obviously had two cameras. If not, what was he using to film the &#8216;making of&#8217; vid? Maybe he was using a still cam and I missed it. </p>
<p>I suspect this is as much a &#8216;can it be done&#8217; type of project. But either way, he did it. He had his own reasons for doing it the way he did. If you are going to judge, judge on the fact that IT WORKS! He set out to do something that was non-trivial, and stuck with it until it did what he wanted. THAT is the point of this site, to celebrate [success | tinkering | learning | what ever you want to call it]. </p>
<p>I will continue to feed the trolls: I have been a near daily visitor to this site for years. Back when there were few comments, and even fewer posts (less than one a day on average) I felt the site&#8217;s comments were almost worthless. Then H.A.D. Experienced a surge of growth. At that point the comments approched the intelectual level of slashdot comments. Sure, there were people who did not fully understand the subject of the post, but their comments were posted in good faith and it helped spur discussion. Now the comments are truly worthless. I am very close to ignoring the comments much the way I ignore Digg comments. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with the project or the way it was done, or even if you think you could do better, I think I speak for many others when I say, I DON&#8217;T CARE. It it isn&#8217;t meant to continue the conversation (and no, putting a project down for any reason does not help advance the conversation. Now if you were to offer a solution to a precieved problem that would be different) I don&#8217;t want to read it.</p>
<p>This was typed on my iPhone. Please ignore any spelling errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyslayer56</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monkeyslayer56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that is one cool way of doing it and if he had used 2 cameras how much of a hack would that be?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is one cool way of doing it and if he had used 2 cameras how much of a hack would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3D hackaday</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3D hackaday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, what I want to see is this hack combined with the previous hack of being able to change the page characteristics so that there&#039;s a 2D and a 3D version of hackaday (at least for the pictured hacks).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, what I want to see is this hack combined with the previous hack of being able to change the page characteristics so that there&#8217;s a 2D and a 3D version of hackaday (at least for the pictured hacks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is a pretty cool idea, you can maybe even actively change the distance apart at certain points to give it some kind of focusing effect. I wonder what the results would be like.


I&#039;m loving these comments, you trolls are becoming more entertaining than the posts. When it&#039;s too simple, you cry about it, when its overly complicated, you cry about it. There&#039;s no winning with you chumps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a pretty cool idea, you can maybe even actively change the distance apart at certain points to give it some kind of focusing effect. I wonder what the results would be like.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m loving these comments, you trolls are becoming more entertaining than the posts. When it&#8217;s too simple, you cry about it, when its overly complicated, you cry about it. There&#8217;s no winning with you chumps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://hackaday.com/2009/10/27/cnc-used-to-make-3d-video-using-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-104381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Ziegler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackaday.com/?p=17840#comment-104381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool idea, but sitting here with my 3D glasses it does not seem to be accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool idea, but sitting here with my 3D glasses it does not seem to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

