Macro lens and image stacking

[Samuel Sargent] built his own lens for making stacked macro images.This project, which was completed as part of his senior thesis, utilizes a Zeiss enlarger lens. The aperture ring was broken, making it difficult to tell how much light was being let into the camera. Instead of scrapping the whole thing he turned it around, making it a macro lens when combined with a few other parts. He’s used a Nikon PB-5 belows, a PK-13 extension tube, and a body cap to provide a way to mount the lens to his camera. A hole was added to the body cap using his Dremel, and a liberal dose of epoxy putty seals all of the gaps.

After the break you can see a couple of photos that [Samuel] made of bismuth. He estimates the sharpest focal length by taking a few test shots. Next he captures a series of images, moving the bellows slightly between each shot. Finally, this set is combined using Helicon Focus image stacking software. Maybe for his graduate thesis he can build a mechanized platform to move the subject automatically.

Comments

  1. Eric says:
  2. d says:

    Where’s the link to the original work?

  3. Whatnot says:

    Exactly, there are various free and open source programs that do stacking, I don’t know why hackaday actually linked to helicon unless this whole thing is an ad, they did not link to nikon after all.
    Even gimp has stacking, although it’s relatively crude to do it with gimp.

  4. Whatnot says:

    Addendum: wikipedia has a nice article on it with a list of many software packages:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_stacking

  5. Rioexxo says:

    Seriously.
    A guy hacks a camera lens and instead of props you give everyone grief,,,

    unless this whole thing is an ad, they did not link to nikon after all.

    You didn’t link either… here, I’ll link….

    http://www.nikon.com/

    Let’s try to be more supportive of our brothers from now on.!
    regards, Rioexxo ®

  6. I used Helicon after looking at many of the different pieces of software that were suggested- from the wikipedia page actually.

    I found that it’s entry ease of use made it much more viable for me. I’m certainly not suggesting that everyone go out and by helicon, and I certainly would have done the work myself in photoshop had I wanted to spend hours and hours aligning each slice, but instead opted to spend about 20 minutes stacking the images with some minor tweaks to Helicon’s settings.

    Workflow is very important, I simply went with what seemed the fastest and most hassle free way to stack my images. If there’s a faster more more effective way than Helicon, I’d love to learn about it. Based off my experiences with Gimp, I can safely say that’s not going to be a workable solution for me.

  7. hans says:

    Is there a difference between focus stacking and z-stacking? I assume not, but you never know.. When Nasa uses this technique for the microscopic imager on the MER landers, they call it z-stacking.

  8. jaded says:

    @hans,

    Just guessing, but perhaps it’s called Z-stacking when it’s a series of images made by using a fixed focus lens and moving the subject closer to or farther from it; and they call it focus stacking when they take a series of images while refocusing the lens instead of moving the subject.

    Although after having googled a while, it looks like the words are pretty interchangeable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94,052 other followers