Stylish OLED Watch Uses Accelerometer Instead of Buttons

A few days ago [Andrew] contacted us to offer his help for the design of the mooltipass project case. While introducing himself, he casually mentioned his OLED watch that you can see above.

The watch is based on the low-power MSP430F microcontroller from Texas Instruments. It can consume as little as 1.5uA while maintaining a real-time clock and monitoring interrupts. It also uses ferroelectric RAM, which doesn’t need any power to retain its memory contents. That means there’s no need to set the time again if you remove the CR2016 battery that powers the watch.

[Andrew] chose an 0.96″ OLED display that only consumes up to 7mA. He also included an accelerometer that allows him to interact with the watch through its single and double tap detecting feature. He modeled his PCB using EagleCAD and the whole assembly using Sketchup. Most of the components were soldered in his reflow (toaster) oven. The final result is a mere 8.8mm thick and looks very professional in our opinion.

Comments

  1. jcwren says:

    “That means there’s no need to set the time again if you remove the CR2016 battery that powers the watch.”

    I guess that depends on how long it takes you to replace the battery, and how much deviation from NST time you’re willing to tolerate. FRAM is good for non-volatile storage, like calibration settings and such. But RTCs require power.

  2. Greenaum says:

    This! This! This is what I want on my wrist! Something programmable, practical, and not too big. Ideally with a little joystick or something to put Tetris or card games on. Did you know there’s no wrist-based games aimed at adults AT ALL!? Well probably you did, but I don’t like to wear my Tetris watch out too much, cos it’ll get damaged.

    If you need a project for next year, do a watch! A cheap, clever, versatile one. There’s currently nothing available that’s all three, even though there should be.

  3. Wow – that’s a great looking watch. It’s very futuristic, industrial but sleek at the same time. It looks like something straight out of the Aliens series.

  4. matt says:

    Is it waterproof? No. Impact resistant? No. Stylish? Not really. Obnoxiously large? Well of course. Who even wears watches nowadays unless it is a status symbol?

  5. Oto says:

    Looks awesome, I want it. Please get it manufactured and sell a lot of them.

  6. hpux735 says:

    I love the industrial design. The first thing I thought of was 5th element, and then I started reading and saw “mooltipass”. It almost made me laugh out loud.

  7. Rapta73 says:

    Anybodies else though, “I WANT THAT!”?

    The design is just awesome.

  8. Adam says:

    This guy and that other watch from a few months ago (with the same screen?) should team up. That would make an awesome timepiece.
    http://hackaday.com/2013/09/27/how-much-can-you-cram-into-a-wristwatch/

  9. Le Samourai says:

    HAD commenters have become so lazy these days! If I’m going to wear a wristwatch for time, it’s going to be because I can “set it and forget it” — that means no worrying about a battery! So I quicky gathered some numbers.

    The low power MSP430 — 1.5 uA.
    The accelero in the low power mode i believe would support a “double tap” function — 6 uA.
    Powering the OLED for 1% of the day (~15 minutes) — 70uA equivalent (1% of 7mA).

    I can’t really read his schematics (low res jpg), so I’ve got to assume that chip on the mid-left is some sort of lower power charge pump. I’ve used them before, they’re monolithic apart from decoupling caps — pretty nifty. They are typically around 90% efficient.

    That gives us 86uA equivalent current draw (again, quick numbers). On a CR2016 cell (90mAh) that’s 1046 hours, or 43 days. Not too bad! However, these are some near-best-case numbers, don’t include everything (quiescent of OLED, full-on draw of the uC, internal losses of the coin cell, etc). I’d like to see him replace that cell with a rechargeable version, and add some sort of little recharge circuit… for mother earth!

    • Le Samourai says:

      And if [Andrew] reads this, please post some better schematics! Thanks =)

    • Greg says:

      the text explains the ICs. there is a 2v under voltage protection IC and a 3v LDO. he says they’re to support LiPo cells. from what I can see there is a jumper link in the form of SMD pads that when shorted bypass this for use with a coin cell. so technically your rough numbers would be 53 days. over a week extra.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s