Circular Saws In the Kitchen, Good Idea or Best Idea?

Kitchen centrifuge using a circular saw

[Mike Warren] was contemplating risky but exciting projects he could do when he came up with this magnificent contraption. A centrifuge made out of an old circular saw!

First question — why? Well if you’re a foody or you enjoy the study of molecular gastronomy, bringing a centrifuge to the kitchen can allow for some more technical dishes. It suddenly becomes possible to separate food based on its density, just like how it works in the lab. Practical applications for super fancy dishes — we’re not too sure — but it involves relatively unsafe power tools and food so we felt obliged to share it!

Let’s start off with the generic warning — in fact, [Mike] states this before the Instructable begins:

Do not replicate this project, it is incredibly dangerous!

The project makes use of an old corded circular saw, a few salad bowls, some threaded rod, a few nuts, some binder clips and some metal plates to hold the plastic test tubes. At 4900RPM (the speed of his saw),he’s calculated his G-Force to be around 1879G’s. Holy cow. A person passes out at around 10Gs, and a bullet fired from a typical handgun is well over 50,000 — on the extreme end of things, a professional lab ultra-centrifuge can hit over 300,000.

These all of course pale by comparison to the Large Hadron Collider, which can accelerate protons at approximately 190,000,000G’s! And to conclude, this is what happens when lab centrifuges blow up. Don’t do it — but do watch the following video and enjoy!

Comments

  1. Tom the Brat says:

    “Why?” Careful! You’ll loose your geek cred asking questions like that! :D

  2. Brandon says:

    At least he took pretty good safety precautions. Not that dangerous when you’re outside a steel enclosed container.

  3. Bob says:

    Visualize whirled peas.

  4. Ken Quast says:

    The angle of the test tubes seems to defeat the logic behind centrifuging to separate materials by density. I posted a $ 5.00 really easy centrifuge two years ago with a video with the tubes traveling radially. There is no comparison with mine as it is only a cheap alternative. Cool hack though!

    http://www.observationsblog.com/4/post/2012/09/homemade-centrifuge-for-five-dollars.html

  5. hboy007 says:

    makes me want to design a cordless drill “centrifuge” bit and 3d print it

  6. Scott_Tx says:

    needs a rotating tube holder so that they go horizontal when the revs kick up.

    • A Man Who's Seen Some Sh!+ says:

      Yes. The big commercial units have that built into the rotors for the big tubes and bottles. Surprisingly, for the small tubes (<50ml) the rotors themselves are built so the cavities are fixed at like 40 degrees. So the sample "pellets" of the densest materials form just off of the bottom of the tube to one side.

  7. A Man Whose Seen Some Sh!+ says:

    “centrifuges do blow up” I’ve actually worked on that exact model of machine, and yes, occasionally rotors get micro-fractures in them or they react badly to reagents (read: mercury in an aluminum low-speed rotor) and things go…”pear-shaped” is being too charitable. As for G forces, if you use a machine that spins at 100,000 RPM, you can actually get close to 1,000,000 G’s! They have to be run under total vacuum to prevent heating due to the friction of the rotor and the air! It can actually separate chromosomes at that speed! One centrifuge that size had a “rotor failure” and it destroyed the 10’x6′ room it was in! It happened overnight on a long run so no one was hurt.

  8. tekkieneet says:

    Dremel™ should start to make kitchen attachments for their rotary tools.

  9. Mitch B says:

    Another site to view before contemplating this:

    http://www.chem.purdue.edu/chemsafety/newsandstories/centrifugedamages.htm

  10. Wattz says:

    I want more tests. Coffee, eggs (would they scramble?), etc. I can’t believe he didn’t try pulling the fat out of milk. The Man Whose Seen Some Shi+ mentioned heat from friction. Could you cook bacon via super-high-speed centrifuge and simultaneous pull all the liquid fat from it?

    Could you sift flour, or better yet, force flour through a super-fine grate to get the lightest cake flour possible?

    So many possibilities…

    • Quin says:

      sifting particulate would need something to keep the particles moving after hitting the high G spin. Otherwise, you’d just get a clump of different sized particles that pack tight, or block up that fine grate.

      As for eggs, you can pull the water apart from the fat if I recall some molecular gastro books. They’d scramble at the low speed, but if you can avoid that they should separate into the fat, the water, and the other proteins. Cream from milk is easy enough. Bacon, being a solid, would be tough; it might heat enough to fry in a kitchen hack, but you’d only get the liquid pooled at the top of the tube on top of the bacon that should have slid down from the force. Density wins out, remember.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 93,770 other followers