Hackaday Prize Entry: The Strength Of 3D Printed Parts

[Sam Barrett] is doing something that is sorely needed. He’s doing real materials research on FDM parts.

There’s nothing wrong with the rough experiments like hanging a 1 L bottle of water from the end of a rectangular test print to compare strengths. We also have our rules-of-thumb, like expecting the print to perform at 30% of injection molded strength. But these experiments are primitive and the guidelines are based on hearsay. Like early metallurgy or engineering; 3D printing is full of made-up stuff.

What [Sam] has done here is really amazing. He’s produced a model of a printed ABS part and experimentally verified it to behave close enough to the real thing. He’s also set a method for testing and proposed a new set of questions. If it couldn’t be better, he also included his full research notebook. Make sure to read the FDMProperties-report (PDF) in the files section of Hackaday.io.

Sam finally answered a question we've had of what it looks like when the printer over extrudes.
Sam finally answered a question we’ve had of what it looks like when the printer over extrudes.

If research like this is being done elsewhere, it’s either internal to a large 3D printer manufacturer, or it’s behind a paywall so thorough only the Russians can help a regular peasant get through to them. Anyone with access to a materials testing lab can continue the work (looking at you every single engineering student who reads this site) and begin to help everyone achieveĀ an understanding of 3D printed parts that could lead to some really cool stuff one day.

16 thoughts on “Hackaday Prize Entry: The Strength Of 3D Printed Parts

  1. the caption to the smaller image has its meaning reversed from the text in the actual image -“from excessive interfibre spacing” not excessive extrusion.

    it is very nice that someone wants to spend the time and resources on researching FDM properties, that said this might be a lot harder than one might assume.

    the material properties will in essence depend on the printer as well as the material, what gets heated where and when combined with how plastic cools would mean that there would be quite a lot of stress already in the part, combine that with the pseudo random composition of some plastic types and it starts to become difficult.

  2. Does anybody know of a slicer program that will position layers offset from the previous layer to allow the fibers to be positioned in a close packed manner instead of directly on top of each other. It seems that this would provide more plastic to plastic contact at the cost of a rougher overall texture.

    1. From what I’ve read this won’t actually increase the strength very much – feel free to conduct more research though! I’d point you to 3.2.6 of the report pdf at the project page if you’re curious.

    1. Also people feel more like it’s a “real world” party by the touch of ABS.
      PLA is still a little strange to most people whereas ABS is a learned material.
      PLA is better though – no warping, stronger at room temperature.

    2. PLA is also a lot more brittle and has less tensile strength, in short it is far from tougher than ABS, it is stiffer and it might adhere better at temperature x, the solution though is increasing ones temperature and z calibration for proper interlayer adhesion.

    3. Material properties vs. ABS are all over the map. PLA is more rigid, but ABS is better for impact. Typical PLA parts can’t hold up to a morning sitting in my car so I don’t bother with PLA unless it isn’t going to leave my building. Even PETG can be a bit of a problem, especially black, nylon is only few degrees better with heat than PETG. ABS is probably the most affordable material that can take a decent amount of heat, i.e. I’ve even had a black ABS part sitting in the back seat and it’s shrugging off the heat just fine.

  3. I did my bachelor thesis on exactly this subject. We tested on multiple properties including water tightness.
    There is a world of difference between the 3 major orientations of 3d printed parts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s