Hackaday Prize Entry: DIY 6-Axis Micro Manipulator

[David Brown]’s entry for The Hackaday Prize is a design for a tool that normally exists only as an expensive piece of industrial equipment; out of the reach of normal experimenters, in other words. That tool is a 6-axis micro manipulator and is essentially a small robotic actuator that is capable of very small, very precise movements. It uses 3D printed parts and low-cost components.

SLS Nylon Actuator Frame. Motor anchors to top right, moves the central pivot up and down to deflect the endpoints.

The manipulator consists of six identical actuators, each consisting of a single piece of SLS 3D printed nylon with a custom PCB to control a motor and read positional feedback. The motor moves the central pivot point of the 3D printed assembly, which in turn deflects the entire piece by a small amount. By anchoring one point and attaching the other, a small amount of highly controllable movement can be achieved. Six actuators in total form a Gough-Stewart Platform for moving the toolhead.

Interestingly, this 6-Axis Micro Manipulator is a sort of side project. [David] is interested in creating his own digital UV exposer, which requires using UV laser diodes with fiber optic pig tails attached. In an industrial setting these are created by empirically determining the optimal position of a fiber optic with regards to the laser diode by manipulating it with a micro manipulator, then holding it steady while it is cemented in place. Seeing a distinct lack of micro manipulators in anything outside of lab or industrial settings, and recognizing that there would be applications outside of his own needs, [David] resolved to build one.

16 thoughts on “Hackaday Prize Entry: DIY 6-Axis Micro Manipulator

    1. Thanks,
      Yes if i had access to EDM machine then metal would be the way to go, but plastic is much lower cost, and more accessible. It should be possible to fabricate the parts using FFF in nylon filament (experiments needed).
      I dont need repetability, just the ability to move very small distances and hold position for 30 seconds whilst the UV cure glue does its thing. So variable resistors are fine for re-setting to the nominal mid-home position and getting a rough feed back of distance moved, as the number of steps will be counted to keep a record of the position.

      1. Note that Cross-strip flexure hinges are often just spot welded or clamped onto mild steels…
        If the specific unhardened-state alloy is too hard on C5 Carbide tooling, than chemical etching or water-jet also works. One could also just laminate mirror part copies if kerf proves an issue for a notch hinge.

        I still don´t personally understand how the recorded-position is repeatable if the Kinematics changed.
        After all, I am only a guy that gets to buy pricey toys form Starrett =)
        However, I look forward to seeing how the design performs, and will ponder about the design a bit more.

    1. Pretty much any case where the cost of high precision actuators such as piezo stacks or alternative fabrication materials are too high, or where equal behaviour could be achieved with much larger apparatus, but where there is a overall access / size constraint.

    1. Based on the diameter of the fiber (105um) positioning needs to be in the region of 5-10um. One of the main issues is to also get the angular position as well. In order to get the end of the fibre aligned and positioned you need 5-axis of movement, the 6th is rotation about the beam axis which is irrelevent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s