Underwater CVS camcorder

cvs underwater

[Everett] got such a great response to yesterday’s nightvision hack he decided to write up this underwater CVS mod. The outside is a Pelican #1010 case. The camera fits almost perfectly inside. A small foam shim is used to position the camera lens between the two thick plastic ridges. Everett relocated the power button to the front of the camera and placed a guard around the shutter button on the back. The shutter is now wired to a reed switch at the back of the case. To start the camera recording he’s attached a magnet to a spring on the outside of the case that you slide over the reed switch to trigger it. If you missed it yesterday, he added an example shot from the nightvision cam. It isn’t swimming season so the only underwater pics he has are from the bathtub, which he luckily hasn’t posted. If you want to start hacking on a CVS cam, [morcheeba] warns that they still haven’t completely broken firmware 3.62 and above. Here is the FAQ.

Comments

  1. tiuk says:

    Heh, that was quick. Good stuff.

  2. vinnie says:

    pretty cool.

    i think ive seen this kid around campus a few times :o

  3. Computer_kid says:

    I like how he is brown-nosing hack-a-day! :-)

  4. heh, I didn’t even realize he was from RPI,

    Cheers for a cool hack coming out of my alma mater.

  5. carpespasm says:

    the 3.62 cams are hacked, it’s the 3.70 and 33.04 cams that have been locked up tight

  6. Mhawk134 says:

    Firmware 3.62 has been hacked. You just have to do a simple short, on power up. FW 3.70 can be tricky and 33.40 hasn’t been able to be hacked by the masses.

    Hawk

  7. Mhawk134 says:

    Firmware 3.62 has been hacked. You just have to do a simple short, on power up. FW 3.70 can be tricky and 33.40 hasn’t been able to be hacked by the masses.

    Hawk

  8. f13nd says:

    why not just put it in the other way and cut a hole for the lens only and have the back of the cam in the clear portion

  9. Stephen says:

    I live in Missouri and we dont have any CVS stores around here…I looked on ebay but the cheepest camera i found there was like 70 bucks, anyone have any info on how i can get my hands on one of these for a reasionable price?

  10. Steve says:

    I already have a superior case. It’s malleable, thin, and can be applied in successive layers for extra protection. You can view the entire line of cases here.

    http://tinylink.com/?ryhh7pHVY0

    They’re available at almost any store you visit, and are disposeable too!

  11. Everett says:

    sorry, but i fail to see how ziploc bags offer “extra protection” as opposed to the pelican case. also, being malleable seems to be a negative when you’re using electronics in harsh environments.

  12. strider_mt2k says:

    Add some IR LEDs and you could strap it to your head for an underwater night vision camcorder uber-device to rule them all!

  13. Steve says:

    Your comments: Its a joke. I’m just pointing out that you could easily pop it in a few ziplocs and achieve the same quality of water proofing. Its cheaper, and a whole lot easier. It may not survive a getting run over by a bus, but you probably won’t be doing anything like that with your camera. Besides, the whole point of these things is that they’re cheap and disposeable. There’s no reason to waste money on some bizzare protective casing when you could slip it into a baggie. I mean, if you’re under water, why does it need a protective shell? Are you scuba diving with sharks? Plus, you don’t have to fuck with magnets, reeds, and springs. You just push the buttons through the plastic.

    I just don’t see the point of something like this. Extra time, money and effort going into some ridiculous disposeable camera armor that obscures the camera’s view. Look at the thing. It has a plastic ridge right over the lens. What are you videotaping that requires both water proofing and an armored shell? Water polo on jet skis?

  14. smilr says:

    If you actually READ the article he mentions that with the addition of a small shim at the bottom of the case, the camera is raised to a point where the ridges are NOT in the field of view for the camera sensor.

    Sure, this may be a disposable camera – but after going through the effort of breaking into the firmware, rigging up a custom usb cable etc., one wouldn’t want it to be damaged. It’s gone from being a disposable camera, to a personal possesion, one worth considerably more than the disposable camera it originally was.

    Zip-loc bags would provide water protection, and the ability to press buttons without adding reed switches and magnets. They would also be far more likely to put a fold or wrinkle of the plastic, or a printed label, directy in front of the lens – obscuring the view.

    It’s not ridiculous, it’s useful and well thought-out.

  15. fucter says:

    ziploc bags are cloudy. malleable is good necause the plastic will bend instead of shattering. my 2 cents.

  16. Steve says:

    I see your point 13, but when clear, label free ziplocs are 2 bucks a pound, you might as well use a handful, fold the loose material over the edge, and put duct tape around the edges of the camera. Unless you’re paintballing on ski-doo’s or something, you don’t need the protection a 15 dollar acrillic case offers. The odds of the baggies ripping underwater in a situation where the other case would have saved you are slim, to say the least. Plus, with baggies, you wont get any glare or reflections, like you probably would with a pelican case.

  17. hawkeyeaz1 says:

    Stephen (#8): I have found Walgreens sells the same type of cameras. They probably sell the same type of video cameras. The internal hardware is a little different, but the price is about the same, and the USB connection/hack is the same. I’m not sure if the firmware has been hacked for them, but I’m betting it has been. So, if you have a Walgreens, that is an option for you.

  18. dear steve,
    i am sorry that putting my cvs camera in a plastic box has offended you so much. also, i’m sorry that me spending my own time, money, and effort has somehow translated into negative consequences for you.

  19. Steve says:

    I’m sorry if i sounded angry, Everett. I’m just pointing out a simpler solution. It’s like that old joke about the space pen. America spent millions of dollars developing a pen that could write in space. The russians used a pencil.

    I’m not mad at you for coming up with a solution like that. It’s great that you take such a creative approach to problems like this. I’m just pointing out an easier way of achieving the same goal.

  20. tiuk says:

    Not sure if you know, steve, but the space pen thing is false. You may have just been using it as an example, but a lot of people seem to think it’s true.

    http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp

  21. Steve says:

    Aye. The damage potential of a free floating, sharpened graphite pencil in a space station or shuttle is amazing. Pens are a much better choice. Don’t want to lose a crew member or vessel to a cheap writing utensil. :-

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92,317 other followers