very interesting, might help future mods.

Posted at 2:16 pm on Apr 7th, 2006 by joel

Yeah, the v5 is underpowered. Only 2MB of storage (others had 4 and 8)…

Posted at 8:26 pm on Apr 7th, 2006 by t3h

CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
When are people going to stop buying this overpriced underpowered shit?

Posted at 11:55 pm on Apr 7th, 2006 by nbd

Seems to me it would be better to make something that more people will buy, even if some (a small minority) will hack it, rather than make something that can’t be hacked that fewer people will buy. I guess Linksys figures that people will buy “the brand name” even if the new version is an inferior product. I’m sure that they won’t reduce the price of the product even though they’ve reduced the performance and features.

Posted at 12:28 am on Apr 8th, 2006 by mac cody

#4 – Of course they won’t reduce the price! In fact, they’ve released the WRT54GL, which still has linux (hence the “l” in the name), but costs MORE.

Posted at 3:12 am on Apr 8th, 2006 by tiuk

the -L version costs 1/5′th less in sweden, and has the old v.2 specs with 16/32 ram.

Posted at 8:50 am on Apr 8th, 2006 by _max_

For the vast majority (>99.9%) of consumers the new WRT54G performs identically to the others. It is significantly cheaper for linksys to produce, therefore it’s a sound business decision for them. This isn’t some conspiracy to stop hacks.

Posted at 6:41 pm on Apr 8th, 2006 by henry

I understand that 2MB flash/8 MB RAM chips are somewhat cheaper than their 4/16 counterparts, but at the volume Linksys purchases, I doubt it really makes a difference.

I run OpenWRT(RC3) on my GS and am currently using 1.5MB flash, and 4MB of RAM, with many user programs and admin tools installed. A build without such things could be even smaller. There is no reason the V5 couldn’t run Linux and have the 2/8 configuration. DD-WRT proved this.

My guess is that it isn’t about preventing hacks, or even the cost of chips, but maintaining the Linux branch for the routers. The official firmware was always behind (i.e. security patches not applied) main tree releases and that paying VxWorks to maintain the OS is probably cheaper than doing it in house. Plus, since its closed source, nobody sees their screw-ups.

Posted at 5:27 pm on Apr 9th, 2006 by Tillin9

>I understand that 2MB flash/8 MB RAM chips
>are somewhat cheaper than their 4/16
>counterparts, but at the volume Linksys
>purchases, I doubt it really makes a
>difference.

I think you answered your own question there, mate…. if LS manufacture a run of tens, even hundreds of thousands of these routers and gain a net saving of, say, a dollar on each one, then that amounts to a saving that could run into hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide a product that will be essentially identical to 90% of their customer base. It may seem petty, but tiny amounts of cost-shaving can make or break a company.

Posted at 9:57 am on Apr 10th, 2006 by Liam

Hey, shameless plug here but I have a WRT54GS version 1 (fully firmware upgradeable and everything) on ebay now, item 9710971308 — just in case anybody is interested… Sorry about the plug I am just a poor hack-a-day reader that happened upon this article relating to my auction!

Posted at 1:51 am on Apr 13th, 2006 by Eric

You can do alot with these routers.

I’ve got one running as an IPTables firewall, as well as providing free wireless access.

Posted at 1:25 pm on Jun 23rd, 2006 by Joe

They have found a way to get the micro version of the DD-WRT firmware onto the V5’s without using the JTAG cable. http://www.bitsum.com/openwiking/owbase/ow.asp?WRT54G5%5FCFE

Posted at 2:15 pm on Jun 26th, 2006 by Marc